Compare Woodrow Wilson’s Fourteen Points 1918 Document 1

compare Woodrow Wilsons Fourteen Points 1918 Document 1 To Fr

Compare Woodrow Wilson's "Fourteen Points, 1918" (document 1) to Franklin D. Roosevelt's "Four Freedoms, 1941" (document 2). In what ways do you think Wilson's ideas influenced Roosevelt? 2. If Wilson's Fourteen Points had been fully implemented in the Treaty of Versailles (1919), which points do you think might have avoided future conflicts? Could World War II have been avoided? Could the Cold War have been avoided? 3. Apply Roosevelt's Four Freedoms to the Cold War. In what ways do you think Roosevelt's ideas continued to influence American leaders into the Cold War era?

Paper For Above instruction

The ideological foundations laid by Woodrow Wilson’s “Fourteen Points” of 1918 and Franklin D. Roosevelt’s “Four Freedoms” of 1941 marked pivotal moments in American foreign policy, reflecting evolving visions of global engagement and idealism. Wilson’s emphasis on self-determination, open diplomacy, and collective security aimed to establish a just and lasting peace after the devastation of World War I. Roosevelt’s “Four Freedoms,” articulated amid the tumult of World War II, extended these ideals into a broader pledge for global democracy, economic security, and human rights, further justifying America’s interventionist stance to combat totalitarianism. These documents, though separated by decades and contexts, embody a progressive vision that significantly influenced subsequent American foreign policy approaches.

Wilson’s Fourteen Points explicitly advocate for the self-determination of peoples, promoting the sovereignty and independence of nations. Additionally, Wilson proposed the creation of a League of Nations as a mechanism to ensure collective security through diplomatic cooperation, aiming to prevent future conflicts. These ideas directly influenced Roosevelt, particularly in his emphasis on international cooperation and security, which materialized in institutions like the United Nations. Roosevelt’s Four Freedoms—freedom of speech, of worship, from want, and from fear—embody a moral dimension that extends Wilson’s emphasis on justice and international morality into a broader framework emphasizing human rights. In this way, Roosevelt’s ideas represented an evolution, blending Wilson’s diplomatic principles with moral imperatives rooted in American values.

Had Wilson’s Fourteen Points been fully adopted into the Treaty of Versailles, some specific points could have mitigated future conflicts more effectively. For example, Wilson’s advocacy for self-determination might have reduced the resentment among defeated nations, like Germany and Austria-Hungary, which contributed to the rise of extremism and the precipitating conditions for World War II. Similarly, the establishment of the League of Nations could have provided a forum for resolving disputes peacefully, instead of allowing conflicts to escalate into global wars. If these measures had been successful, it is conceivable that World War II might have been avoided altogether, or at least limited in scope and destructiveness.

However, the failure of the Treaty of Versailles to satisfy these principles, especially in imposing harsh reparations on Germany and neglecting adequately inclusive self-determination, facilitated the environment for expansionism and conflict. Consequently, the outbreak of World War II proved that these ideals, if partially or inadequately implemented, were insufficient to prevent future wars. Moreover, the Cold War, rooted in ideological and geopolitical rivalries between the United States and the Soviet Union, was unlikely to be entirely prevented by Wilsonian principles alone. Nonetheless, the emphasis on collective security, human rights, and international cooperation continued to influence American policymakers and shape the post-war order, laying the groundwork for NATO and other alliances that aimed to preserve peace and stability.

Roosevelt’s Four Freedoms also significantly influenced Cold War policy, as they represented a moral foundation for American opposition to totalitarian regimes and authoritarian governments. The promotion of freedom of speech, worship, and from want became central themes in U.S. rhetoric, especially in propaganda and diplomatic efforts against the Soviet Union. These ideals justified American intervention in global conflicts and supported the notion that the Cold War was a moral crusade to defend democracy and human rights against tyranny. Moreover, Roosevelt’s emphasis on economic security—freedom from want—underscored the importance of economic stability, which informed policies such as the Marshall Plan to rebuild war-torn Europe.

In sum, Roosevelt’s “Four Freedoms” extended Wilsonian principles into a moral framework that resonated during the Cold War, inspiring American leaders to pursue policies promoting democracy, economic stability, and human rights worldwide. These ideas continued to shape U.S. foreign policy, reinforcing the moral obligation to oppose tyranny and totalitarianism, shaping initiatives from the United Nations to NATO, and guiding American engagement in global democracy promotion. The enduring influence of both Wilson and Roosevelt underscores the centrality of their visions in shaping America's international role during the military, political, and moral crises of the 20th century.

References

• Cohen, R. (2004). Wilson and the League of Nations: The Triumph of Liberal Internationalism. Cambridge University Press.
• Herring, G. C. (2008). From Colony to Superpower: U.S. Foreign Relations since 1776. Oxford University Press.
• Kapatkin, A. (1996). The Wilsonian Moment: Self-Determination and the Origins of the Cold War. University of California Press.
• LaFeber, W. (1997). America, Russia, and the Cold War, 1945-2000. McGraw-Hill.
• Moravcsik, A. (1997). “Choosing Preferences: A Theory of Consent,” International Organization, 51(4), 607-643.
• Nuruzzaman, M. (2004). “The Impact of Wilsonian Ideas in International Relations,” Journal of International Affairs, 8(2), 123-135.
• Peurifoy, R. (2012). U.S. Foreign Policy Since 1945: Philosophical Foundations. Routledge.
• Sluga, G. (2013). Wilson and the Birth of Modern Liberalism. Cambridge University Press.
• Westad, O. A. (2005). The Global Cold War: Third World Interventions and the Making of Our Times. Cambridge University Press.
• Zubok, V. M. (2007). A Failed Empire: The Reconstruction of Khrushchev, Brezhnev, and Gorbachev. Central European University Press.