Competency: Formulate And Evaluate Hypothesis Tests For Popu ✓ Solved

Competency Formulate and evaluate hypothesis tests for population

Competency Formulate and evaluate hypothesis tests for population parameters based on sample statistics using both Critical Regions and P-Values, and be able to state results in a non-technical way that can be understood by consumers of the data instead of statisticians. You are a statistician working for a drug company. A few new scientists have been hired by your company. They are experts in pharmacology, but are not experts in doing statistical studies, so you will explain to them how statistical studies are done when testing two samples for the effectiveness of a new drug. The two samples can be dependent or independent, and you will explain the difference.

Your focus is on hypothesis tests and confidence intervals for two populations using two samples, some of which are independent and some of which are dependent. These concepts are an extension of hypothesis testing and confidence intervals which use statistics from one sample to make conclusions about population parameters.

Your research and analysis should be presented on the Word document provided. All calculations should be provided on a separate Excel workbook that should be submitted to your boss as well.

Paper For Above Instructions

Hypothesis testing is crucial in statistical analysis for making inferences about population parameters based on sample data. In the pharmaceutical industry, where scientists aim to evaluate the effectiveness of new drugs, understanding how to formulate and evaluate hypothesis tests is essential. This paper will help new scientists grasp the concepts of hypothesis testing, focusing on both independent and dependent samples. Additionally, it aims to simplify the statistical terminology, enabling a clear understanding for consumers of the data.

Understanding Hypothesis Tests

Hypothesis testing involves making an initial assumption (the null hypothesis, H0) and determining the likelihood of seeing the observed data if that assumption is true. For example, when testing a new drug, the null hypothesis might state that the drug has no effect on the disease being treated.

The alternative hypothesis (H1) posits that there is an effect, such as the drug being effective in reducing symptoms. Testing these hypotheses typically involves using sample statistics to make inferences about the population from which the samples are drawn.

Critical Regions and P-Values

Two common methods to evaluate hypotheses are through critical regions and P-values. The critical regions method involves setting a significance level (alpha, typically 0.05) which determines the threshold for rejecting the null hypothesis. If the test statistic falls into the critical region (beyond the established threshold), we reject H0.

The P-value approach quantifies the evidence against the null hypothesis. It represents the probability of obtaining test results at least as extreme as the observed results, given that H0 is true. A P-value less than the chosen alpha level indicates strong evidence against H0, leading to its rejection.

Independent vs. Dependent Samples

When conducting hypothesis tests, the samples can either be independent or dependent. Independent samples refer to two groups that do not influence each other. For instance, testing a new drug's efficacy on two different groups of patients who do not interact with one another.

In contrast, dependent samples occur when the two groups are related in some way, such as measuring the same group of patients before and after treatment. Understanding the nature of the samples is crucial, as it affects the choice of statistical tests employed. Independent sample tests (like the independent t-test) and dependent sample tests (like the paired t-test) are used under different circumstances and assumptions.

Applying Hypothesis Tests in Drug Efficacy Studies

Let’s consider an example of a drug company testing a new medication's efficacy. Assume we have two independent samples: one group receives the new drug, while the other receives a placebo. Our null hypothesis is that the new drug has no impact on the patient’s condition, while our alternative hypothesis suggests that there is a significant difference in patient outcomes between the two groups.

After collecting data and performing the appropriate statistical test (e.g., an independent t-test), we calculate the test statistic and P-value. For instance, if our calculated P-value is 0.03 and our alpha level is set at 0.05, we reject the null hypothesis, indicating that the new drug has a statistically significant effect compared to the placebo.

Communicating Results Clearly

It is vital to present statistical results in a clear, non-technical manner for stakeholders who may not have a statistical background. When discussing the results with the pharmacology team, you might say, "We found that patients taking the new drug showed a significant improvement in symptoms compared to those not taking the drug. Our analysis suggests that this drug could be an effective treatment option." This framing provides essential information without overwhelming the audience with statistical jargon.

Conclusion

In conclusion, formulating and evaluating hypothesis tests for population parameters are fundamental skills for statisticians, especially in the pharmaceutical industry. By focusing on critical regions and P-values, along with understanding independent and dependent samples, new scientists can effectively contribute to meaningful data analysis. Moreover, the ability to communicate these statistics in a consumer-friendly manner ensures that the findings can be appreciated and valued beyond the confines of statistical analysis.

References

• Field, A. (2013). Discovering Statistics Using IBM SPSS Statistics. SAGE Publications.
• Howell, D. C. (2012). Statistical Methods for Psychology. Cengage Learning.
• Hinton, P. R. (2014). Statistics Explained. Psychology Press.
• Gravetter, F. J., & Wallnau, L. B. (2016). Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences. Cengage Learning.
• Trochim, W. M. K. (2006). Research Methods: The Essential Knowledge Base. Cengage Learning.
• Erceg-Hurn, D. M., & Mirosevich, V. (2008). Clarifying misconceptions regarding statistical power: a tutorial for counselors. The Counseling Psychologist, 36(4), 579-585.
• Weiss, N. A. (2016). . Pearson.
• Gibbons, J. D., & Chakraborti, S. (2011). Nonparametric Statistical Inference. CRC Press.
• Pagano, M. & Gauvreau, K. (2000). Principles of Biostatistics. Duxbury Press.
• Bluman, A. G. (2018). Elementary Statistics: A Step by Step Approach. McGraw-Hill Education.