For This Discussion, You Will Evaluate The Use Of Literature ✓ Solved

For This Discussion You Will Evaluate The Use Of Literature And Probl

For this discussion, you will evaluate the use of literature and problem statements in assigned journal articles in your discipline to understand what it means for a research study to be justified, grounded, and original. You will use the Use of Literature Checklist, the Problem Statement Checklist, and the Litmus Test as guides for your post. With these thoughts in mind, refer to the Journal Articles document for your assigned articles for this discussion. By Day 4, post a critique of the research study in which you evaluate the authors’ use of literature. Evaluate the research problem. Explain what it means for a research study to be justified and grounded in the literature; then, explain what it means for a problem to be original. The Use of Literature Checklist and Problem Statement Checklist serve as guides for your evaluations. Please do not respond to the checklists in a Yes/No format in your discussion post.

Sample Paper For Above instruction

Introduction

In scientific research, the clarity and quality of the literature review and problem statement are pivotal in establishing the validity and originality of a study. Analyzing how authors utilize existing literature and articulate their research problem provides insight into whether the research is justified and grounded in prior knowledge. This paper critically evaluates a selected journal article by examining the authors' use of literature and their articulation of the research problem, guided by specific checklists and criteria.

Evaluation of the Use of Literature

The authors of the article demonstrate a comprehensive review of existing literature, effectively situating their research within the broader scientific context. The literature review is current and relevant, citing seminal and recent studies that highlight gaps in knowledge and justify the necessity of the current research. For example, the authors refer to Greenhalgh et al. (2015) to underscore socio-cultural factors influencing health behaviors among South Asian women with diabetes in pregnancy, establishing the cultural context that their study aims to address.

The use of literature aligns with the criteria outlined in the Use of Literature Checklist, which emphasizes the importance of critically engaging with previous research to identify gaps and justify new inquiries. The authors not only summarize relevant findings but also critically assess limitations in prior studies, thereby emphasizing the need for their research. They integrate the literature seamlessly into their rationale for the study, demonstrating depth and scholarly rigor.

Evaluation of the Research Problem

The research problem articulated in the article is clear, focused, and meaningful within its context. It addresses a specific gap identified through the literature review: the socio-cultural influences on health behaviors among South Asian women with diabetes during pregnancy. The problem statement actively links to previous work, portraying a gap in understanding how these influences affect health outcomes, thereby emphasizing the importance of culturally tailored interventions.

This problem exhibits characteristics of originality as it explores an under-researched population and a nuanced topic, contributing novel insights to the field. The problem is sufficiently narrow to allow in-depth investigation while being sufficiently broad to have practical implications for healthcare providers and policy makers.

Justification and Grounding in Literature

For a research study to be justified, it must be grounded in an extensive review of existing literature that identifies gaps or unresolved issues, demonstrating the need for further inquiry. The authors justify their study by highlighting inconsistencies and gaps in previous research on socio-cultural influences, which justify the investigation performed. Grounding implies that the research is deeply embedded in the scholarly conversation, with the study designed to add meaningful knowledge rather than replicate prior work.

The article exemplifies this by citing a wide range of relevant studies, positioning their research as a necessary step to fill specific knowledge gaps. The thorough literature review ensures that the study is relevant and justified within the current scientific discourse.

What It Means for a Problem to Be Original

The originality of the research problem refers to its novelty, uniqueness, and contribution to advancing knowledge within the field. In this article, the problem is original because it examines socio-cultural influences on health behavior in a specific demographic—South Asian women with diabetes in pregnancy—that has been under-explored in previous research. Furthermore, by applying a multi-level theoretical framework, the authors introduce a novel approach to understanding these influences.

Originality also stems from addressing a practical issue with cultural sensitivity, which can impact health interventions and policies significantly. The problem’s focus on a specific population and context provides new insights, which distinguish it from broader or more generic studies.

Conclusion

Overall, the authors’ use of literature effectively establishes the study’s justification and grounding, aligning with scholarly standards and checklist criteria. Their research problem is well-defined, original, and relevant, making a meaningful contribution to the field of health sociology and cultural competency. This critical evaluation underscores the importance of thorough literature review and precise problem statement formulation in conducting impactful research.

References

• Greenhalgh, T., Clinch, M., Afsar, N., Choudhury, Y., Sudra, R., Campbell-Richards, D., ... & Finer, S. (2015). Socio-cultural influences on the behaviour of South Asian women with diabetes in pregnancy: Qualitative study using a multi-level theoretical approach. BMC Medicine, 13, 120. doi:10.1186/s12916-015-0364-2
• Booth, A. (2006). Trustworthiness and authenticity in qualitative research. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 53(4), 491-500.
• Grant, M. J., & Booth, A. (2009). A typology of reviews: An analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Information & Libraries Journal, 26(2), 91-108.
• Maxwell, J. A. (2013). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach. Sage publications.
• Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage Publications.
• Flick, U. (2018). An introduction to qualitative research. Sage Publications.
• Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice. Sage publications.
• Hennink, M., Hutter, I., & Bailey, A. (2020). Qualitative research methods. Sage Publications.
• Sanders, L. M. (2014). Equity-focused evidence-informed decision making. International Journal for Equity in Health, 13(1), 110.
• Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods. Sage publications.