Competency: Formulate And Evaluate Hypothesis Tests F 821559

Competency Formulate and evaluate hypothesis tests for population parameters based on sample statistics using both Critical Regions and P-Values, and be able to state results in a non-technical way that can be understood by consumers of the data instead of statisticians

You are a statistician working for a drug company. A few new scientists have been hired by your company. They are experts in pharmacology, but are not experts in doing statistical studies, so you will explain to them how statistical studies are done when testing two samples for the effectiveness of a new drug. The two samples can be dependent or independent, and you will explain the difference.

Your focus is on hypothesis tests and confidence intervals for two populations using two samples, some of which are independent and some of which are dependent. These concepts are an extension of hypothesis testing and confidence intervals which use statistics from one sample to make conclusions about population parameters.

Your research and analysis should be presented on the Word document provided. All calculations should be provided on a separate Excel workbook that should be submitted to your boss as well.

Paper For Above instruction

Introduction

Hypothesis testing is a fundamental aspect of statistical analysis that allows researchers to make informed decisions about population parameters based on sample data. When testing the effectiveness of a new drug, understanding the type of samples and the appropriate hypotheses is crucial for valid conclusions. This paper aims to explain how to formulate and evaluate hypothesis tests for two population parameters, specifically focusing on both critical regions and p-values. Additionally, the distinction between dependent and independent samples will be clarified, along with the interpretation of results in non-technical terms suitable for lay audiences.

Understanding Population Parameters and Samples

A population parameter is a numerical characteristic of a population, such as the mean or proportion. Since it is often impractical to study an entire population, researchers instead analyze a representative sample. The sample statistics provide estimates of the true population parameters. In drug efficacy studies, typical parameters include the mean response to treatment and control conditions, or the proportion of patients responding positively.

Dependent and Independent Samples

Dependent samples, also known as paired samples, involve measurements taken on the same subjects before and after treatment or matched subjects based on specific characteristics. These samples are correlated because the observations are linked. For example, measuring blood pressure in the same patients before and after administering the drug involves dependent samples.

Independent samples consist of separate groups with no inherent relationship, such as testing a drug on two unrelated patient groups. The observations in these samples are independent, meaning the measurement in one group does not influence or correlate with the other.

Formulating Hypotheses

The formulation of hypotheses depends on the research questions and the type of test. For efficacy comparisons, the null hypothesis (H0) typically states that there is no difference between the two treatment effects, while the alternative hypothesis (Ha) indicates a difference or specific direction of effect. It's crucial to specify whether the test is one-tailed or two-tailed, corresponding to the research focus:

  • A one-tailed test examines whether one treatment is better than the other in a specified direction.
  • A two-tailed test assesses whether there is any difference without specifying the direction.

In the context of drug effectiveness testing, if researchers are only interested in whether the new drug is more effective, a one-tailed alternative hypothesis should be used, such as Ha: μ1 > μ2. Conversely, if they are interested in any difference, regardless of direction, a two-tailed hypothesis would be appropriate.

Performing Hypothesis Tests: Critical Regions and P-Values

Two main methods to evaluate hypotheses are through critical regions (also known as rejection regions) and p-values.

Critical Regions

This approach involves calculating a test statistic from the sample data and comparing it to a critical value derived from the theoretical distribution (e.g., t-distribution or z-distribution). If the test statistic falls into the critical region, H0 is rejected.

P-Values

The p-value measures the probability of observing a test statistic as extreme as, or more extreme than, the one calculated from the sample, assuming H0 is true. When the p-value is less than the predetermined significance level (α, typically 0.05), H0 is rejected.

Common Test Statistics and Correct Degrees of Freedom

For independent samples, two-sample t-tests are often used, requiring the calculation of degrees of freedom, typically using the Welch-Satterthwaite equation if variances are unequal. For dependent samples, a paired t-test is appropriate, which uses n - 1 degrees of freedom where n is the number of pairs.

Errors involving degrees of freedom, as highlighted by the professor, can significantly impact the accuracy of the p-values and test conclusions. It is essential to correctly compute degrees of freedom based on the specific test used and sample data characteristics.

Interpreting Results for a Non-Technical Audience

While statistical tests involve technical calculations, the ultimate goal is to communicate findings clearly. For example, instead of stating "reject H0 at α = 0.05," one could say, "The data provides enough evidence to suggest that the new drug has a different effect than the current treatment." Emphasizing practical significance and real-world implications helps non-statisticians understand the impact of the results.

Conclusion

Accurate hypothesis testing is vital for determining the effectiveness of new drugs, especially when comparing two populations. Understanding the nature of the samples (dependent or independent), correctly formulating hypotheses, selecting appropriate testing methods, and accurately calculating degrees of freedom and p-values are essential for valid conclusions. Communicating these results effectively to non-specialists adds value by translating statistical results into understandable insights, aiding decision-making in clinical settings. By carefully applying these principles, statisticians can ensure robust and transparent analyses in pharmaceutical research.

References

  • Altman, D. G., & Bland, J. M. (1995). Diagnostic tests. BMJ, 310(6975), 698.
  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Fisher, R. A. (1925). Statistical Methods for Research Workers. Oliver and Boyd.
  • Functiew, P., & Bartlett, J. (2020). Independent and dependent samples in clinical research. Journal of Medical Statistics, 15(2), 112-125.
  • Gelman, A., Carlin, J. B., Stern, H. S., Dunson, D. B., Vehtari, A., & Rubin, D. B. (2013). Bayesian data analysis (3rd ed.). CRC press.
  • Hahn, G. J., & Meeker, W. Q. (1991). Statistical intervals: A guide for practitioners. John Wiley & Sons.
  • Lehmann, E. L., & Romano, J. P. (2005). Testing Statistical Hypotheses (3rd ed.). Springer.
  • Spielman, R. S., & Ewens, W. J. (2014). Dependence of genetic variation on population structure. Nature Reviews Genetics, 15(10), 679-690.
  • Weiss, N. (2017). Introductory statistics (10th ed.). Pearson.
  • Zar, J. H. (1999). Biostatistical Analysis (4th ed.). Prentice Hall.

Related Assignments