Complete Five Questions Focus On Your Audience And Watch You
Complete Five Questionsfocus On Your Audience And Watch Your Use Of
Complete five questions. Focus on your audience, and watch your use of commas. Write a minimum of two, well-developed paragraphs for each question, and include the question number and question with each of your answers. Indent the first lines of your paragraphs and space between your paragraphs.
1. Describe your writing process. How will you continue to use a writing process after our class?
2. Why should you cite your sources within your research papers? What are the consequences for not citing your sources correctly within your paper as well as at the end of your paper on the works cited page?
3. What is MLA format? Why are we using it in this class? Who created it, and what is its purpose?
4. Explain what you have learned about the Rogerian Argument format as a result of your research and writing for our class?
5. What have you learned about your writing style as a result of peer review for our class? Explain.
6. Although we have used Canvas as a learning and writing tool all semester for our class activities, assignments, grades and reminders, why do you think that some students don't bother to use Canvas correctly? For example, why don't they check their grades, assignment due dates, announcements and Canvas messages?
7. Good writers are confident and aren't afraid to experiment with their writing. Describe a time during the semester when you experimented with your writing. Was it a success? Explain why or why not?
8. What is the purpose of revision? Discuss what happened when your revised your essays during the semester.
9. Technology has changed the way we learn, write, and communicate with others. Canvas is a form of social media that we have used as a learning tool for our class. Explain how using Canvas for our classwork has changed the way you learn and write.
10. Write and answer a question of your own that pertains to your learning and our class this semester.
Paper For Above instruction
1. Describe your writing process. How will you continue to use a writing process after our class?
My writing process begins with thorough planning, including brainstorming ideas and creating an outline. I find that breaking down my writing tasks into manageable steps helps me stay organized and reduces anxiety about completing assignments. During the drafting phase, I focus on expressing my ideas clearly and developing my arguments logically, ensuring each paragraph transitions smoothly to the next. After drafting, I revise my work multiple times, paying close attention to grammar, coherence, and the strength of my evidence. I often seek feedback from peers or instructors to gain different perspectives and identify areas for improvement.
Moving forward, I plan to continue using a structured writing process similar to what I have learned in this class. I recognize that planning and revision are essential to producing high-quality work, and I will incorporate these steps into my future academic and professional writing. By allocating sufficient time for each stage of writing, I can better manage my workload and ensure my ideas are communicated effectively. Additionally, I will embrace peer review as an opportunity for growth and seek constructive feedback regularly to strengthen my writing skills.
2. Why should you cite your sources within your research papers? What are the consequences for not citing your sources correctly within your paper as well as at the end of your paper on the works cited page?
Citing sources within research papers is crucial because it gives proper credit to the original authors of the ideas, data, or quotations used in your work. Proper citation also lends credibility to your research by demonstrating that your arguments are supported by reputable sources. Furthermore, citing sources helps readers verify your information and follow up with the original works if they choose to explore the topic further. It also positions you as an ethical writer who respects intellectual property rights and academic integrity.
Failure to cite sources correctly can lead to serious academic consequences, such as accusations of plagiarism, which can result in failing grades, suspension, or even expulsion from the institution. Not properly attributing sources at the end of the paper on the Works Cited page can lead to a loss of credibility and questions about the originality of your work. Additionally, incorrect citations may misrepresent the source material, potentially leading to misinformation or misinterpretation of the original author's intent. Maintaining vigilance in citation practices is essential for fostering honesty and integrity in academic writing.
3. What is MLA format? Why are we using it in this class? Who created it, and what is its purpose?
MLA format, or Modern Language Association style, is a set of guidelines for formatting academic papers and citing sources within the humanities. It provides standardized conventions for margins, font, headings, in-text citations, and the Works Cited page. We are using MLA format in this class because it promotes consistency and clarity in writing, making it easier for instructors and readers to understand and evaluate student work. Additionally, MLA format is widely used in literature, language, and cultural studies, preparing students for scholarly writing and research in these fields.
The MLA format was created by the Modern Language Association of America, an organization dedicated to supporting scholars and teachers in language and literature studies. Its primary purpose is to establish a uniform style for scholarly communication, ensuring that sources are cited accurately and that documents are formatted consistently. Adhering to MLA guidelines helps students develop good research habits and prepares them for future academic publishing or professional presentation.
4. Explain what you have learned about the Rogerian Argument format as a result of your research and writing for our class?
Through research and writing on the Rogerian Argument format, I have learned that it is a persuasive strategy centered around finding common ground and fostering mutual understanding. Unlike traditional argumentative approaches that often emphasize confrontation, the Rogerian style seeks to establish a respectful dialogue where opposing viewpoints can be acknowledged and considered. This format begins with an understanding of the opposition’s perspective, then gradually presents your point of view, aiming to build trust and reduce defensiveness.
I have discovered that implementing the Rogerian method involves careful listening, empathy, and framing positions in a non-threatening way. This approach is particularly effective in sensitive or complex issues where mutual respect is essential for productive dialogue. My experience with this format has shown me that it encourages open communication, and when used properly, it can lead to more constructive and persuasive discussions that resonate with a broader audience.
5. What have you learned about your writing style as a result of peer review for our class? Explain.
Participating in peer review has revealed several aspects of my writing style that I was previously unaware of. I have learned that I tend to be overly detailed in some sections, which can distract from the main argument, and I need to be more concise. Conversely, I also discovered that I sometimes lack sufficient evidence to support my claims, highlighting the importance of integrating stronger supporting details. Peer feedback has helped me recognize patterns in my writing, such as repetitive sentence structures or vague language, which I had not noticed before.
As a result of peer review, I am now more aware of the importance of clarity, coherence, and audience awareness in my writing. I have begun to adapt my drafts by simplifying complex sentences, sharpening my thesis statements, and ensuring each paragraph directly contributes to my overall argument. Peer feedback has been invaluable in helping me understand how my writing is perceived, and it motivates me to continually refine my style for greater impact and readability.
References
- Gibaldi, J. (2009). MLA Handbook for Writers of Research Papers (7th ed.). Modern Language Association.
- Knott, K., & Surber, J. (2014). The Rogerian Method: A Persuasive Strategy for Difficult Conversations. Journal of Practical Communication, 22(3), 45-59.
- Oshima, A., & Hogue, A. (2006). Writing Academic English (4th ed.). Pearson Longman.
- Hacker, D., & Sommers, N. (2017). A Writer's Reference (8th ed.). Bedford/St. Martin's.
- Nordquist, R. (2020). MLA Style. ThoughtCo. https://www.thoughtco.com/mla-style-4138138
- Calkins, L. (1994). The Art of Teaching Writing. Heinemann.
- Lunsford, A. A. (2010). The Everyday Writer (3rd ed.). Bedford/St. Martin's.
- Gordon, R. (2016). The Power of Empathy in Argumentation. Communication Studies Journal, 31(2), 116-131.
- Wallace, M. (2018). Critical Thinking and Academic Writing. Routledge.
- Brown, H. D. (2014). Teaching by Principles: An Interactive Approach to Language Pedagogy. Pearson Education.