Complete The Challenge Phase Simulation Assignment
Complete The Challenge Phase Simulation Assignmenti Wanted To Give You
Complete the Challenge Phase Simulation Assignment. When starting the Challenge Phase Assignment, change the month to August in the Monthly Profit Report to use a full month of data for benchmarking. Note that in August, sales in both Rooms and Restaurant were almost 50% below budget, requiring significant wage cuts to meet the target results. When copying your changes forward to impact the whole of September, ensure you copy for 5 weeks and rerun the simulation until September 30th. Disregard the $210,000 corporate credit entry, as it seems to be an error that complicates the simulation.
Paper For Above instruction
The challenge phase of business simulation exercises is designed to test strategic decision-making, financial analysis, and operational adjustments based on real-time data. Proper execution requires careful analysis of historical data, accurate adjustments of operational variables, and precise execution of simulation steps to reflect a realistic business environment.
The first step in tackling this challenge is modifying the Monthly Profit Report to focus on August. The rationale here is to utilize a full month of data that provide more accurate benchmarking metrics, including sales, expenses, and profit margins. Analyzing August’s data offers insights into seasonal fluctuations and business trends, necessary for informed decision-making. It also helps establish a baseline for comparing subsequent changes and understanding their impacts.
A critical observation is that in August, sales in both Rooms and Restaurant were approximately 50% below budget. This underperformance necessitates extensive cost control measures, particularly in wages. Reducing wages significantly will be essential to align expenses with diminished revenue and achieve the required financial targets. However, wage cuts must be strategic to maintain employee morale and service quality; thus, some cuts should be balanced with operational efficiencies and productivity improvements.
When implementing changes, it is vital to replicate the adjustment process across the entire planning horizon, specifically by copying the changes forward for five weeks. This preemptive step ensures that the impact of decisions extends seamlessly through September, allowing accurate simulation of operational adjustments over this period. Running the simulation until September 30th ensures a comprehensive assessment of the cumulative effects of these strategic decisions, providing a clear picture of financial stability and operational resilience.
An important clarification involves the atypical inclusion of a $210,000 corporate credit, which seems to be an anomaly inserted into the simulation. Disregarding this figure simplifies the analysis, focuses attention on core operational metrics, and prevents misinterpretation of the financial data. The goal remains to optimize operational efficiency and profitability through strategic decision-making, complemented by precise data analysis and simulation execution.
Strategically, this exercise underscores the importance of reactive decision-making based on accurate data. It illustrates how operational variables like wages and sales influence financial outcomes, emphasizing the need for balanced adjustments to sustain profitability. Additionally, it highlights the importance of iterative simulation runs to validate changes and ensure they align with overall business objectives.
In conclusion, effective completion of this simulation involves detailed data analysis, strategic operational adjustments, meticulous execution of simulation steps, and critical interpretation of results. By focusing on August benchmark data, making extensive yet balanced wage cuts, copying adjustments forward for five weeks, and running the simulation through September 30th, participants can develop valuable insights into the dynamics of business management. This process enhances understanding of how financial metrics and operational decisions interplay, guiding future strategic planning and operational effectiveness.
References
Gamble, J. E., & Thompson, A. A. (2019). Essentials of Strategic Management. McGraw-Hill Education.
Heizer, J., & Render, B. (2020). Operations Management. Pearson.
Simons, R. (2021). Levers of Control: How Managers Use Innovative Control Systems to Drive Strategic Renewal. Harvard Business Review Press.
Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (2001). The Strategy-focused Organization: How Balanced Scorecard Companies Thrive in the New Business Environment. Harvard Business School Press.
Arnaboldi, M., Lapsley, I., & Neville, C. (2015). Modern management accounting: A review of the theories and their application in practice. Management Accounting Research, 27, 14–31.
Wilson, R. M. (2008). The role of management accounting in strategic planning. Strategic Finance, 90(6), 10–17.
Otley, D. (2016). The contingency theory of management accounting and control: 1980–2014. Management Accounting Research, 31, 45–62.
Merchant, K. A., & Van der Stede, W. A. (2017). Management Control Systems: Performance Measurement, Evaluation and Incentives. Pearson.
Johnson, H. T., & Kaplan, R. S. (1987). Relevance lost: The rise and fall of management accounting. Harvard Business School Press.
Anthony, R. N., & Govindarajan, V. (2007). Management Control Systems. McGraw-Hill Education.