Compose And Answer One Original Question Per Group Below

Compose And Answer One Original Question Per Group Belowgroup 1 Aris

Compose and answer one original question per group below: Group 1: Aristotle or Mill (Pick one; both author's files are attached below) Group 2: Sartre (Sartre's file is attached below) Q&A Discussion Forum: You will be asked to come up with two original questions based on the work of two different authors in each week’s required readings. Think about what stood out to you in the works in question—what ideas, theories, or approaches did you find to be interesting, engaging, or perhaps intriguing or challenging? (See each Discussion Forum for the specific authors or works you may select from in forming your questions.) Your task is then to do your best to answer each of your own questions as incisively and thoroughly as possible within a word-count range of around words maximum (posts with fewer than 250 words will not receive any credit). The word count includes your question but not any citations. You must cite at least one source, which will be the particular essay or article from the required readings you are addressing. You are welcome to bring in as many others sources as you may need, but this is optional. Just be sure to cite any source from which you take ideas, arguments, or passages of language within the body of your response (next to the quoted or paraphrased passages), including the full source information at the end of your response (you need not do a separate works cited or reference page for this assignment). Your score for this part of the assignment will be based on the relevance, sophistication, and originality of your questions as well as the insight, understanding, and incisiveness expressed in your answers. This assignment will be due at the end of day on each Friday of the course. In these essay-style responses to your own questions, you should express a point of view and support your view with good reasons, evidence, examples, expert opinion, etc. High marks will not be achieved by simply reporting back information from the text or other sources. Philosophical thinking and writing involves more than presenting information; beyond doing this, you must also critically assess the issue in question—this involves original thinking and analysis. Moreover, you should attempt to come to some final position in response to the question and include evaluation of others’ positions or views on the issues involved in the question. Work for originality and development of critical analyses and evaluations. Each one of your two Q&A Discussion threads should be formatted as follows: My first question is: My answer to this question is:

Paper For Above instruction

In this discussion, I have chosen to focus on the ethical philosophy of John Stuart Mill and how his utilitarian perspective contrasts with Aristotle's virtue ethics. Mill's emphasis on maximizing happiness and utility raises important questions about moral decision-making and societal well-being. My first question is: How does Mill's concept of happiness differ from Aristotle’s notion of eudaimonia, and what implications do these differences have for moral behavior? I believe Mill’s happiness centers on pleasure and the avoidance of pain, quantified as the greatest good for the greatest number, while Aristotle's eudaimonia emphasizes living in accordance with virtue, leading to a flourishing life that integrates moral character and rational activity. The implication of this distinction is significant: Mill's utilitarianism risks neglecting the development of moral virtues in favor of measurable pleasure, whereas Aristotle’s virtue ethics fosters moral character as intrinsic to human excellence. In response, Mill might argue that happiness fundamentally includes virtue since virtuous actions tend to lead to pleasure, but critics suggest that this reduces complex moral qualities to simple pleasures, risking a superficial moral landscape (Radford, 2001). On the other hand, Aristotle’s view implies that moral behavior is rooted in the cultivation of virtues, which serve as the foundation for genuine human flourishing—a more holistic approach (Hursthouse, 2010). This comparison underscores a key debate in ethics: whether moral actions should aim primarily at tangible happiness or at cultivating virtues that define moral excellence and human fulfillment. Both perspectives provide valuable insights into the nature of morality, but they also highlight divergent visions of what constitutes the 'good life.'

References

• Hursthouse, R. (2010). On Virtue Ethics. Oxford University Press.
• Radford, M. (2001). Mill's Utilitarianism. Routledge.