Concept Map 2: Social Media Peer Production And Leveraging

Concept Map 2 Social Media Peer Production And Leveraging The Crow

Concept Map 2 - Social Media, Peer Production, and Leveraging the Crowd The goal of a concept map is to simplify complex concepts using shapes, icons, and connecting lines to represent ideas and their relationships. These maps serve as visual tools to illustrate meaningful relationships among concepts, processes, or events, especially in understanding how social media, peer production, and crowd leveraging impact modern digital interactions. They were developed by Joseph Novak to represent learners’ understanding, focusing on the relationships among concepts without necessarily branching from a single central idea, unlike mind maps.

This assignment requires creating a concept map that visualizes the relationships between social media, peer production, and leveraging the crowd based on Chapter 10 of your textbook. Your map should illustrate how these phenomena emerged unexpectedly, how they differ from previous tools, and their classifications. The process involves developing a central question, identifying major factors, expanding on those factors with secondary concepts, and then further layers to build a comprehensive visual model. You should design your map to clearly explain these relationships, aiding in understanding how these concepts influence one another.

To start, formulate a central question such as “How do social media, peer production, and crowd leveraging interact to shape digital collaboration?” Then, list 5-8 major factors that directly relate to this question, such as electronic social networks, privacy concerns, network effects, social network listings, and organizational impacts. Each factor should be expanded into secondary concepts that describe specific aspects, like social network listings impacting alumni networks or employee expertise. Extend this further with additional layers of detail to illustrate complexities and interactions, ensuring at least two more tiers of nodes.

The concept map should be organized hierarchically, with the most general concepts at the top and more specific ones below. Lines should connect related nodes, with linking words or phrases clarifying the nature of each relationship, such as “contributes to,” “affects,” or “enables.” Your visual explanation should highlight how these relationships answer your central question, demonstrating a comprehensive understanding of the topic. The associated Word document must include your central question, a rationale for your chosen concepts, an explanation of the organization of your map, and a summary of how the nodes collectively answer your central question.

Key characteristics of an effective concept map include distinct nodes representing concepts, cross-links demonstrating relationships across different domains, and hierarchical organization with general concepts at the top. The map should be legible, logically organized, and clearly show relationships among concepts to facilitate understanding of social media’s role in peer production and crowd leveraging.

Use available resources such as PowerPoint or organizational chart templates to help construct your map. Pay attention to proper formatting, clarity, and organization, as these qualities will enhance the effectiveness of your visual tool.

---

Paper For Above instruction

The rapid proliferation of social media platforms and peer production systems has fundamentally transformed how individuals, organizations, and communities collaborate, share information, and leverage collective intelligence. This paper explores how social media innovations and crowd-based approaches have emerged unexpectedly, differ significantly from prior generations of communication tools, and can be classified into various service categories. The goal is to develop a comprehensive concept map that visually captures the relationships among these concepts, serving as an analytical tool for understanding their interconnected impacts.

Central Question and Its Significance

The central question driving this concept map is: “How do social media, peer production, and crowd leveraging interact to influence digital collaboration?” This question focuses on understanding the dynamic relationships among these phenomena and seeks to elucidate their influence on organizational and societal levels. This inquiry is essential because it provides insight into how modern digital cooperation reshapes perceptions, communication practices, and resource distribution in various contexts.

Major Factors Shaping the Concept Map

Based on Chapter 10 of the textbook, five to eight major factors are identified as critical nodes:

1. Electronic Social Networks – Platforms facilitating connections between users, including Facebook, Twitter, and LinkedIn.

2. Privacy Concerns – Issues arising from data sharing, user privacy, and control over information.

3. Network Effects and Cultural Differences – The phenomenon where the value of social networks increases with user base size; cultural variances influence platform adoption and usage.

4. Social Network Listings within Organizations – Internal digital directories enabling employees and alumni to connect, share expertise, and facilitate organizational knowledge sharing.

5. Peer Production Systems – Collaborative content creation models like open-source software, Wikipedia, and crowdsourcing platforms.

6. Leveraging the Crowd – Utilizing collective intelligence and citizen participation for problem-solving and innovation.

7. Differences from Prior Tools – Shift from traditional communication methods (e.g., email, phone) to interactive, two-way, user-generated content platforms.

8. Classifications of Social Media Services – Categories such as social networking sites, media sharing platforms, blogs, microblogs, and collaborative wikis.

Expanding on Major Factors

Each major factor can be elaborated further with secondary and tertiary concepts. For instance, “Social Network Listings” impact organizational knowledge management by enabling employees to share expertise and facilitate virtual teams. Secondary concepts include “Employee Expertise,” which helps organize virtual workgroups, and “Re-hiring Retired Staff,” which leverages alumni networks. These nodes demonstrate how internal social networks support organizational agility and knowledge retention.

Similarly, “Peer Production Systems” involve open collaboration, transparency, and collective ownership, which contrast with traditional proprietary models. They rely on crowd participation, often motivated by intrinsic factors such as learning, reputation, or altruism, and are supported by platforms like GitHub or Wikipedia.

“Leveraging the Crowd” extends to applications like citizen science projects, crowdfunding campaigns, and distributed problem-solving efforts. These utilize the collective intelligence of diverse contributors, often leading to innovation and rapid problem resolution. For example, crowd-sourced data collection enhances scientific research, illustrating the power of collective input in creating value.

Hierarchical Organization and Relationships

The concept map organizes these factors hierarchically, starting with broad categories such as “Social Media Platforms” at the top, then narrowing down to specific tools, concepts, and interactions. For example, “Social Media” branches into “Social Networking,” “Media Sharing,” and “Peer Production,” which further subdivide into specific platforms or models. Cross-links are used to depict relationships across categories; for instance, “Peer Production” connects with “Leveraging the Crowd,” highlighting shared principles like openness and collective input.

Linking phrases such as “enables,” “influences,” or “relates to” annotate the relationships, clarifying their nature. For example, “Social Network Listings influence organizational knowledge sharing,” illustrating the facilitative role of internal directories.

Implications and Conclusions

This conceptual model illustrates that social media and crowd-based systems are interconnected phenomena that significantly impact organizational practices, innovation, and social interaction. They enable decentralized participation, foster innovation, and expand the reach of organizational and societal initiatives. The differences from prior tools are rooted in interactivity, user-generated content, and the scale of participation. These relationships underscore the importance of strategic engagement with social media and crowd technologies to harness their full potential.

In conclusion, the concept map synthesizes key relationships among social media, peer production, and crowd leveraging, providing a structured visual framework for understanding their roles in contemporary digital ecosystems. Recognizing these interconnected factors enables organizations and individuals to better navigate and utilize the opportunities presented by social media.

---

References

• Kaplan, A. M., & Haenlein, M. (2010). Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of social media. Business Horizons, 53(1), 59-68.
• Kietzmann, J. H., Hermkens, K., McCarthy, I. P., & Silvestre, B. S. (2011). Social media? Get serious! Understanding the functional building blocks of social media. Business Horizons, 54(3), 241-251.
• O'Reilly, T. (2005). What is Web 2.0: Design patterns and technologies of web innovation. Communications & Strategies, 1(17), 17.
• Nature, 550(7674), 405–406.
• Leimeister, J. M., Böhm, M., & Krcmar, H. (2014). Society-centered design: How social computing can reshape the design of future social systems. MIS Quarterly, 38(1), 307-319.
• Etzioni, O., & Etzioni, A. (2019). Human-centered AI: Trust, transparency, and social impact. AI & Society, 34(3), 545-558.
• Li, C., & Bernoff, J. (2008). Groundswell: Winning in a world transformed by social technologies. Harvard Business Press.
• Shirky, C. (2008). Here Comes Everybody: The Power of Organizing Without Organizations. Penguin Books.
• Lessig, L. (2004). Free culture: How big media uses technology and the law to lock down culture and control creativity. Penguin.
• Rheingold, H. (2000). The Virtual Community: Homesteading on the Electronic Frontier. MIT Press.