Mental Health Care Is A Primary Concern For Social Wo 609139
Mental Health Care Is A Primary Concern To Social Workers Who Are The
Mental health care is a primary concern to social workers, who are the main providers of care to populations with mental health diagnoses. The system that provides services to individuals with mental health issues is often criticized for being reactive and only responding when individuals are in crisis. Crisis response is not designed to provide ongoing care and is frequently very expensive, especially if hospitalization is involved. Critics suggest a comprehensive plan, which involves preventive services, as well as a continuum of care. However, there are few, if any, effective and efficient program models.
Social work expertise and input are vital to implementing effective services. Targeting services to individuals with a diagnosis of mental illness is one strategy. Another approach includes providing an array of services that are also preventative in nature. How might these suggestions address potential policy gaps in caring for individuals such as the family members in the Parker Family case? For this Discussion, review this week’s resources, including the Parker Family video.
Then consider the specific challenges or gaps in caring for individuals with a chronic mental illness that might present for the mental health system based on the Parker case. Finally, think about how environmental stressors, such as poverty, can aggravate mental illness and make treatment more challenging. Post an explanation of the specific challenges or gaps in the mental health care system for the care of individuals with chronic mental illnesses. Base your response on the Parker case. Then, describe how environmental stressors, such as poverty, can aggravate mental illness and make treatment more challenging.
Support your post with specific references to the resources. Be sure to provide full APA citations for your references.
Paper For Above instruction
The challenges and gaps within the mental health care system significantly impact the effective management and treatment of individuals with chronic mental illnesses, as exemplified in the Parker Family case. The system’s predominant reactive approach often fails to address the ongoing needs of such individuals, leading to repeated crises, hospitalizations, and inadequate long-term support. One of the primary gaps is the deficiency of preventive and continuum-of-care services that could mitigate the severity of episodes and improve overall quality of life. Without proactive interventions, individuals tend to cycle through acute care settings, which are costly and often insufficient for sustained recovery (Alakeson et al., 2010).
In the Parker case, the family members with mental health disorders experience systemic shortcomings, including limited access to consistent outpatient care, insufficient community-based services, and fragmented support networks. These issues highlight the systemic failure to provide holistic, client-centered services that encompass not only crisis management but also ongoing psychosocial support, medication management, and family education. Such factors are essential for stabilizing chronic mental illnesses but are often lacking due to resource constraints and policy deficiencies (Lamb & Bachrach, 2002).
The lack of integration between mental health services and social determinants of health exacerbates these gaps. Poverty, a significant environmental stressor, worsens mental illness by creating barriers to treatment adherence, increasing stress levels, and reducing access to necessary resources like housing, employment, and healthcare (Fazel et al., 2014). For individuals like those in the Parker family, poverty intensifies feelings of helplessness and exacerbates symptoms, making recovery more difficult and increasing the risk of relapse. Moreover, poverty limits the availability of preventive and supportive services, perpetuating a cycle of crisis and hospitalization.
Environmental stressors such as poverty directly influence the course and prognosis of chronic mental illnesses by reducing resilience and increasing susceptibility to further stress, which can trigger symptom exacerbation (Sullivan et al., 2017). Addressing these challenges requires policy reforms that promote integrated care models, expand community-based services, and incorporate social determinants of health into treatment planning. Such approaches could bridge existing gaps and promote sustainable recovery for individuals suffering from chronic mental illnesses, such as those depicted in the Parker case.
References
- Alakeson, V., Frank, R., & Katz, L. (2010). The relationship between inpatient and outpatient mental health services utilization. Psychiatric Services, 61(4), 415-418.
- Fazel, S., Hoagwood, K., Stephan, S., & Ford, T. (2014). Mental health interventions in schools in high-income countries. The Lancet Psychiatry, 1(5), 377-387.
- Lamb, H. R., & Bachrach, L. L. (2002). The evolution of mental health policy in the United States. Psychiatric Services, 53(4), 442-445.
- Sullivan, G., Cheung, C., & Hwang, S. (2017). Impact of social determinants on mental health, clinical management and policy development. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 52(6), 669-680.