Conduct A Literature Review In Information Technology Strate

Conduct A Literature Review In Information Technology Strategic Planni

Conduct a literature review in Information Technology Strategic Planning. You are to review the literature on Information Technology Strategic Planning and discuss problems and gaps that have been identified in the literature. You will expand on the issue and how researchers have attempted to examine that issue by collecting data – you are NOT collecting data, just reporting on how researchers did their collection. As you read the literature, it will become apparent that there are multiple issues, pick one issue that stands out in the literature and agree on that as a Team to address that.

Paper For Above instruction

Introduction

The rapid evolution of technology and its integral role in organizational success underscores the importance of effective strategic planning in Information Technology (IT). IT strategic planning (ITSP) aligns technological initiatives with overarching business goals, ensuring competitive advantage, operational efficiency, and innovation. The burgeoning body of literature on ITSP addresses various challenges, frameworks, and best practices, yet persistent gaps remain. This paper provides a comprehensive literature review of IT strategic planning, focusing on identified problems and gaps, especially emphasizing an issue that stands out—the integration of IT strategies with overall organizational strategies.

Literature Review on IT Strategic Planning

Several scholars have explored the processes, frameworks, and methodologies of ITSP. For instance, Bracker and Pearson (1986) underscored the importance of aligning IT with business objectives, proposing models that integrate strategic planning at different organizational levels. Similarly, Broun and Gibbs (2000) emphasized the significance of strategic alignment models, such as the Strategic Alignment Model (SAM), which examines the alignment between business and IT strategies across domains. These models aim to facilitate better decision-making and resource allocation (Luftman et al., 1999).

However, despite the proliferation of strategic frameworks, implementation remains complex. Cummins and Tucci (2010) highlight that many organizations struggle with translating strategic plans into actionable initiatives. Moreover, the dynamic nature of technology environments often renders static strategic plans obsolete, requiring continuous reassessment and adaptation (Henderson & Venkatraman, 1993). This creates a gap between strategic formulation and execution, frequently leading to misalignment or underperformance.

Another significant issue discussed in the literature is the role of organizational culture and leadership in ITSP. Teo and King (1999) argued that strategic alignment is contingent not only on structured processes but also on leadership commitment and organizational culture. When leadership fails to prioritize IT as a strategic asset, plans often falter, resulting in poor integration and underutilized investments (Benbutu et al., 2018).

Problems and Gaps in the Literature7>

Despite extensive research, major gaps persist in understanding the practical challenges of IT strategic planning. A primary issue is the lack of empirical evidence on how organizations adapt strategic plans to ever-changing technological landscapes. Many studies rely on conceptual frameworks or case studies with limited generalizability (Lederer & Sethi, 1992).

Furthermore, there is a notable deficiency in research addressing how organizational structures impact IT plan implementation. While some authors suggest decentralization may hinder alignment (Hedstrom, 1997), there is inconclusive data on the optimal governance models for effective IT strategic planning (Pearson & Robinson, 2011).

Another underexplored area is the integration of emerging technologies—such as cloud computing, big data, and AI—into existing strategic frameworks. As these technologies evolve rapidly, organizations face challenges in updating their strategic plans accordingly. Most existing models are designed for traditional IT landscapes and may not sufficiently address the agility required in modern contexts (Hedstrom et al., 2016).

Focus Issue: Strategic Alignment Between IT and Organizational Goals

Among various issues, the alignment between IT strategy and organizational goals emerges as particularly prominent and persistent in scholarly discourse. This problem is critical because misalignment can result in wasted resources, missed opportunities, and a failure to realize expected benefits from IT investments (Luftman, 2000). While several models aim to improve this alignment, challenges remain regarding practical implementation, especially in dynamic and complex organizational environments.

Studies like those by Henderson and Venkatraman (1993) suggest that effective alignment requires continuous monitoring and flexibility rather than a static plan. Yet, many organizations still develop rigid strategic plans that fail to accommodate rapid technological changes. Moreover, organizational resistance and leadership disengagement are common barriers impeding effective alignment (Benbutu et al., 2018).

This issue is compounded by the difficulty in measuring alignment and its impact, creating a gap in both theoretical understanding and managerial application. Researchers have attempted to address this by developing maturity models (Luftman et al., 2004) and assessment tools; however, consensus on best practices remains elusive, indicating an urgent need for further empirical research.

Research Efforts and Data Collection Methods

Research on IT strategic planning primarily employs qualitative and quantitative approaches. Case studies constitute a significant portion of the literature, providing in-depth insights into specific organizational contexts but limited generalizability (Lederer & Sethi, 1992). Surveys and questionnaires also are common, allowing researchers to collect perceptions and self-reported data across diverse firms (Luftman et al., 1996). These methods help identify common challenges, success factors, and the influence of organizational variables on IT strategy effectiveness.

Some studies incorporate longitudinal designs, tracking strategic alignment over time to analyze dynamic capabilities and adaptation processes (Henderson & Venkatraman, 1993). Others employ action research, engaging practitioners in iterative development of alignment strategies but often lack rigorous validation. With technological advancements, recent research has started exploring digital tools and analytics as data sources for measuring alignment and strategy execution (Hedstrom et al., 2016).

However, gaps remain regarding the standardization of measurement techniques and the integration of emerging data-driven methodologies. There is also a need for more robust, cross-industry quantitative data to validate models and theoretical propositions, facilitating scalable strategies for diverse organizational sizes and sectors.

Conclusion

The literature on IT strategic planning reveals significant insights yet highlights enduring issues, particularly the challenge of aligning IT initiatives with organizational goals amidst technological dynamism. Most studies acknowledge this problem but provide limited empirical evidence on effective, scalable solutions. The dynamic adaptation to technological change, organizational culture's influence, and emerging technology integration are areas requiring further investigation. Addressing these gaps can help organizations develop more resilient and adaptive strategic plans, ultimately enhancing the value derived from IT investments.

Focusing research efforts on practical implementation of alignment models, empirical validation across various organizational contexts, and leveraging advanced data analytics will be crucial. As organizations continue to navigate rapid technological change, developing flexible, evidence-based strategies will remain essential for sustained organizational success and innovation.

References

  • Benbutu, B. J., Ebohon, O. J., & Olukanni, T. (2018). Organizational Culture and Strategic Alignment of IT in Nigerian Banks. Journal of African Business, 19(4), 479–496.
  • Bracker, J. C., & Pearson, R. (1986). Planning and financial performance: An exploratory study. Strategic Management Journal, 7(6), 473–485.
  • Broun, R., & Gibbs, J. (2000). Strategic alignment: An exploratory study of how organizations adjust their IT strategies. MIS Quarterly Executive, 2(2), 85–102.
  • Cummins, J. G., & Tucci, C. L. (2010). Strategic management of technology and innovation. Journal of Business Strategy, 31(4), 62–71.
  • Hedstrom, J. (1997). The impact of organizational structure on IT planning effectiveness. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 6(3), 187–205.
  • Hedstrom, J., et al. (2016). Digital transformation and the strategic management of emerging technologies. Information & Management, 53(4), 447–460.
  • Henderson, J. C., & Venkatraman, N. (1993). Strategic alignment: Leveraging information technology for transforming organizations. IBM Systems Journal, 32(1), 4–16.
  • Lederer, A. L., & Sethi, V. (1992). Strategic levers for effective information systems planning. Information & Management, 22(4), 209–226.
  • Luftman, J. (2000). Assessing Business-IT alignment. Information Systems Management, 17(4), 9–15.
  • Luftman, J., et al. (1999). Strategic alignment: A model for a dynamic and complex process. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 7(2), 57–76.

Related Assignments