Theory Review Form 70 To 63.0 Pts Advanced The Two Forms

Theory Review Form 70 to >63.0 pts Advanced The two forms are clear, concise, and 1–2 pages each

This assignment requires you to complete two Theory Review Forms based on scholarly articles or books that focus on a well-established theory relevant to your research topic. Each review must be approximately 1–2 pages, summarizing key aspects of the selected theoretical works. Both reviews should concentrate on the same theory, with one source being the seminal work of the primary theorist and the other a more recent article supporting or extending the theory. Your summaries must be written in your own words, highlighting the theory's main components, key constructs, origins, and relevance to your research. You will identify the primary theorist(s), define essential constructs with operational clarity, and illustrate how the theory originated historically, citing relevant literature. Additionally, include quotes from the sources with proper APA citations, and articulate how each article or book might contribute to your research. Finally, list recent references that could aid further exploration of the theory, focusing on literature published within the last five years. All sources must be scholarly, correctly formatted in current APA style, and specifically about the theory, not just mention it indirectly. Both forms should be well-organized, clear, and concise, adhering to the 1–2 page requirement.

Paper For Above instruction

The purpose of this assignment is to deepen your understanding of a specific theoretical framework that supports your research topic. Selecting a well-established theory allows for a structured examination of its core components, historical development, and relevance. This process involves critically analyzing two scholarly sources: one seminal work by the primary theorist and a recent supporting article. By doing so, you demonstrate your ability to interpret scholarly literature, extract key elements of the theory, and apply these insights to your research context.

First, identify the central research question guiding your exploration of the theory. This contextualizes the significance and application of the theory in your study. For instance, if your research pertains to online learning effectiveness, you might examine Vygotsky’s social constructivism or Knowles' adult learning theory as frameworks. Once the theory is chosen, locate two scholarly sources—ideally, one foundational work and one contemporary article—that provide comprehensive insight into the theory's principles and applications.

Summarizing these sources in your own words, you should highlight the key components and constructs of the theory. For example, if reviewing Bandura’s self-efficacy theory, you would describe the influence of perceived self-efficacy on behavior change, detailing constructs like mastery experiences, vicarious experiences, social persuasion, and physiological states. Define each construct operationally to show clear understanding and how they are measured or observed in research.

Additionally, it is crucial to explore the historical development of the theory, including its origin, the influence of the primary theorist, and the socio-historical context. This historical perspective enriches your comprehension of the theory's evolution and relevance. For Vygotsky, this might involve noting its roots in Soviet psychology and its development through cultural-historical activity theory.

Including two pertinent quotes from each source, with proper APA citations, further grounds your understanding of the theory’s foundational ideas. These quotes should serve to underscore essential points discussed in your summaries.

In the critical thinking component, articulate how each article or book will inform your research. Consider the theoretical insights gained and how they could shape your methodology, discussion, or interpretation of findings. For example, understanding motivation theories could influence your approach to designing learner-centered interventions.

Finally, identify recent literature—within the last five years—that complements or extends your understanding of the theory. This might include contemporary empirical studies applying the theory in new contexts or reviews synthesizing recent developments. Proper APA citations and links (DOI or URLs) are required.

Completing this process will enhance your theoretical foundation, ensuring your research is grounded in well-established, thoroughly understood frameworks. This disciplined approach prepares you to critically engage with your scholarly literature, build coherent theoretical models, and contribute meaningfully to academic discourse in your field.

References

• Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191–215. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191
• Bandura, A. (2012). On the functional properties of perceived self-efficacy revisited. Journal of Management, 38(1), 9–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206311415900
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
• Knowles, M. S. (1980). The adult learner: A neglected species. Gulf Publishing.
• Keller, J. M. (2008). An integrative theory of motivation, volition, and performance. Academic Press.
• Schunk, D. H. (2012). Self-efficacy and motivation. Educational Psychologist, 47(3), 179–185. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2012.695935
• Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The "what" and "why" of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01
• Sälzer, C., & Ricken, M. (2016). Motivation theories in education. In S. H. Hattie & J. H. Richler (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 521–548). Routledge.
• Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Self-efficacy: An essential motive to learn. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 82–91. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1027
• Schunk, D. H., & DiBenedetto, M. K. (2020). Motivation and social-cognitive theory. In R. Ryan & E. Deci (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of self-determination theory (pp. 123–157). Oxford University Press.