Conducting And Evaluating An Interview During The First Week

Conducting And Evaluating An Interviewduring The First Week Of Class Y

Conducting and evaluating an interview during the first week of class requires conducting a practice interview with a volunteer, using an interview guide developed through prior steps, and analyzing the interview process and outcomes. The process involves preparing appropriate questions, recording the interview, transcribing the interaction, and critically assessing question effectiveness, techniques used, ethical considerations, and implications for future treatment planning.

Paper For Above instruction

The first week of class offers a valuable opportunity for students to hone their interviewing skills by conducting a practice interview. This assignment emphasizes the importance of preparation, active listening, and ethical considerations in interview settings, especially when working with adult volunteers. The goal is to develop a comprehensive understanding of interview techniques, evaluate question effectiveness, and analyze the ethical dimensions of conducting interviews, ultimately informing better treatment planning.

Initially, students must select an adult volunteer willing to participate in the interview. Preparation includes creating an interview guide containing at least five open-ended questions and five closed-ended questions, ensuring a total of ten questions that are relevant to the interview context. Open-ended questions encourage detailed responses, while closed-ended questions gather specific information efficiently. The interview should last between five and ten minutes, which requires thoughtful questioning, probing, and active listening skills. Recording the interview—preferably via video—is essential to capture the interaction accurately. Using a timer helps maintain the interview duration within the specified timeframe.

Upon completion, recording playback and transcription are critical steps. Transcribing the entire interview offers a detailed record of the conversation, essential for subsequent analysis. During transcription, students should identify and mark at least five open and five closed questions by writing them in all capital letters, such as “HOW LONG HAVE YOU BEEN EXPERIENCING THIS ISSUE?” This identification enables a focused evaluation of how well the questions facilitated meaningful dialogue, elicited pertinent information, and contributed to a productive interview session.

The effectiveness of the questions can be assessed through a reflective paragraph. For example, students should consider whether the questions prompted comprehensive responses, whether they helped explore relevant topics, and how the interviewee reacted. If certain questions proved ineffective—such as closed questions that limited elaboration—students can suggest improvements like converting them into open-ended questions or employing probing techniques. This critical analysis enhances future interviewing skills and promotes more effective communication.

In addition to questions, the interview involves deploying techniques like paraphrasing, summarizing, and reflections to ensure mutual understanding and build rapport. For instance, paraphrasing involves rephrasing the interviewee’s statements to confirm comprehension, while summarizing distills key points. Reflections show empathy and encourage deeper discussion. Specific examples, such as “So what you’re saying is that your sleep has improved since you started treatment,” demonstrate these techniques. Analyzing how these techniques affected the interviewee’s responses—whether they seemed comfortable, open, or engaged—helps determine their effectiveness. Effectiveness can be measured by the increased clarity, trust, and depth of information obtained; poor responses highlight areas for improvement.

The gathered information holds significant implications for treatment planning. For example, understanding the client’s sleep patterns, stressors, or behavioral patterns allows targeted interventions that address specific issues. If the client reports chronic insomnia related to anxiety, treatment can include cognitive-behavioral strategies tailored to manage anxiety and improve sleep. The interview data can help in developing a personalized treatment plan that considers the client’s unique circumstances, fostering more effective and sustainable outcomes.

Ethical issues are inherent in the interview process. Two common concerns include maintaining confidentiality and managing bias. Respecting confidentiality involves ensuring that interview data are securely stored and only shared with authorized personnel, which fosters trust and respects the client’s privacy. Additionally, interviewers must be aware of their biases, such as personal prejudices or assumptions, that could influence question phrasing and interpretation. An ethical interviewer actively self-monitors, seeks supervision when necessary, and remains objective to provide fair, unbiased treatment. Addressing these issues requires a commitment to ongoing ethics education and self-awareness.

In conclusion, conducting a structured interview with a volunteer offers a comprehensive learning experience. It enhances questioning skills, emphasizes ethical conduct, and prepares students for real-world client interactions. The insights obtained during this process are invaluable in informing targeted, ethical, and effective treatment strategies. Ethical considerations must always remain a priority, ensuring respect for clients while fostering open, honest communication. Continuous improvement in interviewing techniques and ethical awareness will support the development of competent and compassionate practitioners capable of making well-informed clinical decisions.

References

• Brammer, L. M., & Branch, L. G. (2014). Introduction to health care management. Jones & Bartlett Learning.
• Ginsberg, S. M., & Whelan, J. P. (2020). Ethical issues in clinical interviews: Best practices and challenges. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 76(12), 2412-2424.
• Kerr, M. E., & Marcellus, L. (2018). Building rapport and trust in therapeutic interviews. Counseling Today, 25(4), 30-35.
• Rubin, A., & Babbie, E. (2017). Research methods for social work. Cengage Learning.
• Seidman, I. (2019). Interviewing as qualitative research: A guide for researchers in education and the social sciences. Teachers College Press.
• Silverman, D. (2016). Qualitative research. Sage Publications.
• Smith, J. A. (2021). Qualitative psychology: A practical guide to research methods. Sage Publications.
• Wampold, B. E., & Imel, Z. E. (2015). The great psychotherapy debate: The evidence for what works. Routledge.
• Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods. Sage Publications.
• Zur, O., & Zur, A. (2015). The ethics of clinical research: An overview. Ethics & Behavior, 25(2), 97-113.