Consider What You Learned In This Course

Consider The Followinghas What You Learned In This Course Or Module Ch

Consider the following has what you learned in this course or module changed your point of view on capital punishment? Why or why not? Given the fact that some people are wrongfully convicted and are ultimately released through prisoner advocacy initiatives like the Innocence Project, should our country consider repealing the death penalty? Why or why not? Has what you have learned in this course caused you to assess the practicality of the theoretical concepts in criminal justice goal setting as it pertains to deterrence, rehabilitation, incapacitation, and restoration? Why or why not? How would you argue for or against each of these concepts? Has what you’ve learned in this course caused you to compare contrasting points of view as they relate to three-strike laws? Why or why not? If you or a loved one were the victim of violence by a habitual offender, how might that affect your views of three-strike laws? The debate between prevention and graduated sanctions will ensue for many years. My challenge to you is: What role will you play in bringing resolution to the continuing concern about youth development goals for at-risk youth and the youth habilitation goals for delinquent youth? In synthesizing the totality of your learning in this course, what single factor contributed most to your current views of at-risk youth and what three goals can be established to lessen the likelihood of their following a lifetime of criminality? Why? Has what you’ve learned in this course caused you to formulate potential solutions to juvenile violence or delinquent youth? After appraising available options, where do you think we need to invest our money, our energies, and our commitments? Is it in prevention, or in punishment? What is the best alternative to find the balance needed to ensure that future generations see a decline in criminal violence? Create a 3 - 4 paragraph meaningful reflection that addresses all of the above Then, please comment on at least two items submitted by your peers.

Paper For Above instruction

The course has significantly impacted my perspective on capital punishment, especially concerning its moral and practical implications. Initially, I supported the death penalty as a deterrent, but learning about wrongful convictions and the efforts of organizations like the Innocence Project has prompted me to reconsider. wrongful convictions highlight the irreversible nature of capital punishment, raising ethical concerns and questions about justice. Given these insights, I believe that the United States should seriously consider repealing the death penalty to prevent executions of innocent people and uphold ethical standards. The systemic flaws and possibility of error make it a morally and practically untenable punishment in a just society.

Theoretical concepts like deterrence, rehabilitation, incapacitation, and restoration each offer unique insights into criminal justice policy. My learning has led me to recognize that while deterrence and incapacitation are often emphasized, rehabilitation and restoration are equally crucial for sustainable social progress. For instance, policies focusing solely on punishment may reduce immediate crime but neglect the importance of rehabilitating offenders and restoring community trust. Arguing for rehabilitation involves emphasizing its potential to transform offenders and reduce recidivism, whereas critics argue it is too idealistic and resource-intensive. Similarly, restorative justice seeks to repair harm and rebuild relationships, which can foster societal healing. My understanding has deepened regarding how these concepts can complement rather than oppose each other when designing a balanced criminal justice system.

When examining three-strike laws, I have found that they stem from a desire to protect public safety by incapacitating habitual offenders. However, their application raises concerns about fairness and proportionality, especially when minor offenses trigger long-term imprisonment. If I or a loved one were a victim of violence by a habitual offender, my support for these laws might increase. Nonetheless, I recognize the importance of ensuring justice is equitable and that sentencing reflects the severity of crimes. Balancing the need for safety with fairness is essential for maintaining public trust in the justice system. These contrasting points of view highlight the ongoing debate about how best to manage repeat offenders while safeguarding individual rights.

Addressing youth development and delinquency requires a multidimensional approach focused on prevention, intervention, and habilitation. My learning suggests that investing in early childhood education, community engagement, and mental health services can significantly reduce the likelihood of youth engaging in criminal behavior. The most influential factor shaping my views on at-risk youth is understanding the importance of supportive environments that foster positive development. Goals such as enhancing access to quality education, providing mentoring programs, and creating employment opportunities can decrease the risk of a lifetime of criminality. In tackling juvenile violence, I believe that allocation of resources should prioritize preventative measures over punitive sanctions, as prevention addresses root causes and promotes long-term societal benefit.

Ultimately, the balance between prevention and punishment remains complex. My reflection leads me to advocate for a strategic investment in prevention, particularly through community-based programs that target at-risk youth early. This approach not only reduces future criminality but also fosters healthier, more resilient communities. By emphasizing preventative strategies supported by evidence-based practices, future generations can experience a decline in violence and criminal behavior. My role in this context involves advocating for policies that prioritize support and rehabilitation, promoting societal healing over mere punishment, and fostering sustainable youth development initiatives that mitigate the roots of criminal behavior.

References

• Bennett, T., & Holloway, K. (2014). Criminal justice: An introduction. Routledge.
• Carson, E. A. (2016). Prisoners in 2015. U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics.
• DuBois, D., & Silverthorn, N. (2005). Youth prevention programs: Concepts and practices. Child & Adolescent Social Work Journal, 22(4), 319-331.
• Garland, D. (2001). The Culture of Control: Crime and Social Order in Contemporary Society. University of Chicago Press.
• Hirschi, T. (1969). Causes of Delinquency. University of California Press.
• Mears, D. P., & Cochran, J. C. (2014). Prisoner Reentry in the Era of Mass Incarceration. Springer.
• National Research Council. (2013). Juvenile Crime Research. The National Academies Press.
• Pogrzeba, A., & Brown, K. (2020). Restorative justice practices in criminal justice reform. Journal of Justice Studies, 45(2), 111-126.
• Wacquant, L. (2009). Punishing the Poor: The Neoliberal Government of Social Insecurity. Duke University Press.
• Wilson, J. Q., & Kelling, G. L. (1982). Broken Windows: The police and neighborhood safety. The Atlantic Monthly, 249(3), 29-38.