Consider Your Department Or Organization's Mission And Pract

Consider Your Department Or Organizations Mission And The Problems Y

Consider your department or organization’s mission, and the problems you face in the workplace. Identify 2-3 problems you would like to work toward solving. Using the steps outlined on pp. in Puccio, Mance, & Murdock, analyze the degree of importance and probability of success for each problem, as well as the “success zone” within which each falls. Based on this evaluation, identify one problem you’d recommend working on resolving, and provide a rationale as to why you chose the problem.

Paper For Above instruction

In the context of any organization or departmental setting, aligning problem-solving initiatives with the core mission is essential for fostering meaningful progress and achieving strategic goals. This paper explores the process of selecting pertinent problems within a workplace, evaluating their significance and feasibility, and ultimately recommending a specific issue for resolution based on a structured analysis grounded in the methodology outlined by Puccio, Mance, & Murdock.

Firstly, identifying problems aligned with an organization’s mission involves understanding the overarching goals and values that define its purpose. For this analysis, three critical problems emerged within the workplace: (1) Ineffective communication channels, (2) Employee engagement decline, and (3) Inconsistent performance evaluations. These problems are core to organizational health, employee morale, and operational efficiency.

Applying the steps from Puccio, Mance, & Murdock’s framework, each problem was assessed in terms of its importance and likelihood of success in resolving it. The first problem, ineffective communication channels, was deemed highly important because clear communication is fundamental to organizational success. Its probability of success was rated as moderate, given existing technological limitations but possiblilities for improvement through training and new tools. This problem falls within the “success zone,” indicating it is a viable candidate for intervention.

Secondly, the issue of declining employee engagement was critically important, impacting productivity and retention. The probability of successfully improving engagement through targeted initiatives was considered relatively high, given successful case studies in similar organizations. This problem also lies within the success zone, suggesting it’s a promising focus area.

Finally, the inconsistency in performance evaluations was identified as moderately important, especially regarding fairness and transparency, but it presented a lower probability of success due to entrenched organizational habits and resistance to change. This problem, while significant, falls outside the ideal success zone owing to implementation challenges.

Based on this evaluation, the problem of declining employee engagement was selected as the priority for resolution. The rationale for this choice stems from its high importance to organizational vitality and the favorable assessment of its success potential. Addressing engagement issues could lead to improved morale, productivity, and retention, thereby directly supporting the organization’s mission. Additionally, proven strategies and interventions exist to enhance engagement, making this a pragmatic and impactful focus area.

In conclusion, aligning problem-solving efforts with organizational priorities requires a careful assessment of each issue’s importance and feasibility. The structured approach provided by Puccio, Mance, & Murdock offers a valuable framework for making informed decisions. Focusing on employee engagement holds the promise of significant organizational benefits, aligning well with the mission and strategic goals of the organization.

References

• Puccio, G. J., Mance, M., & Murdock, M. (2011). Creative leadership: Skills that drive change. Sage Publications.
• Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context: Update to the social psychology of creativity. Westview Press.
• Goleman, D. (2013). Emotional Intelligence: Why It Can Matter More Than IQ. Bantam Books.
• Maslow, A. H. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review, 50(4), 370-396.
• Kotter, J. P. (2012). Leading change. Harvard Business Review Press.
• Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (2002). Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation. American Psychologist, 57(9), 705-717.
• Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The" what" and" why" of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227-268.
• Robinson, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (2019). Organizational Behavior (18th ed.). Pearson.
• Schaufeli, W., & Bakker, A. (2004). Job demands, job resources, and their relationship with burnout and engagement: A multi-sample study. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25(3), 293-315.
• Brown, P., & Leigh, T. W. (1996). A new look at psychological climate and distance: Some implications for theory and research. Research in Organizational Behavior, 18, 317-346.