Create A 3-5 Page Paper Excluding Title And References
Create A Three To Five Page Excluding Title And Reference Pages APA
Create a three-to-five-page (excluding title and reference pages) APA formatted journal. Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of wind-generated and wave-generated energy. Use critical thinking to show the degree the production processes consume additional fossil fuel energy to produce the components for wave and wind generated electricity. Use at least two library articles and additional resources to validate the assertions and opinions created in the journal. Critical thinking is accomplished by defining an assumption that needs to be true for an assertion to be correct. For example, for a given energy source to be environmentally safe, animal safety needs to be within an acceptable tolerance.
Paper For Above instruction
Introduction
Renewable energy sources have gained substantial interest in recent decades due to their potential to mitigate climate change and promote sustainable development. Among these sources, wind and wave energy stand out as promising options, particularly because of their vast untapped potential and relatively low environmental footprint. However, evaluating their advantages and disadvantages involves critical considerations, especially when accounting for the energy costs associated with manufacturing, installing, and maintaining these systems. This paper discusses the benefits and drawbacks of wind and wave-generated energy, emphasizing the extent to which their production processes consume additional fossil fuel energy, which must be factored into their overall sustainability metrics.
Advantages of Wind-Generated Energy
Wind energy is one of the fastest-growing renewable energy sources worldwide. Its primary advantage lies in its low operational costs and minimal environmental impact once turbines are installed. Wind turbines produce electricity without emitting greenhouse gases, supporting efforts toward decarbonization (World Energy Council, 2022). Additionally, wind energy can be generated at various scales, from small residential setups to large offshore farms, providing versatility in deployment (National Renewable Energy Laboratory [NREL], 2020).
Another significant advantage is the abundance and widespread availability of wind resources, particularly in coastal and rural areas. Wind farms also require relatively small land footprints, allowing for dual land-use practices such as agriculture alongside energy production (Heintzelman et al., 2021). These factors make wind energy a cost-effective and environmentally friendly option, especially in regions with strong and consistent wind patterns.
Disadvantages of Wind-Generated Energy
Despite its benefits, wind energy has notable disadvantages. The intermittent and unpredictable nature of wind poses challenges for grid stability and reliability, demanding supplementary storage solutions or backup systems (Milligan et al., 2021). Furthermore, the manufacturing of wind turbines involves the extraction and processing of raw materials such as steel, concrete, and rare earth elements, which require significant fossil fuel energy, contributing to their lifecycle emissions (Burke & Planko, 2022).
The visual and ecological impact of wind turbines, especially offshore, is another concern. Turbine blades can pose risks to bird and bat populations, and noise pollution may disturb local communities (Kuvlesky et al., 2007). Moreover, the initial capital investment is high, and the economic viability is often dependent on government incentives and subsidies.
Advantages of Wave-Generated Energy
Wave energy has enormous potential due to the vast amount of power contained in ocean waves. Its primary advantage is its predictability compared to wind, as tidal and wave patterns are highly periodic and forecastable, providing a more reliable energy source (Falcão, 2010). Additionally, wave energy systems have minimal visual impact and tend to cause less ecological disruption than terrestrial or aerial systems.
Wave energy can also be harnessed in remote or coastal areas with limited access to electrical grids, thereby enhancing energy access (The World Bank, 2019). Its high energy density means that less land area is required to generate substantial amounts of electricity, reducing land use conflicts.
Disadvantages of Wave-Generated Energy
Despite its promise, wave energy faces technological and economic challenges. The harsh marine environment accelerates wear and tear on equipment, increasing maintenance costs (Falcão, 2010). The complexity of designing durable and efficient wave energy converters remains a significant hurdle, often requiring substantial research and development investments.
From an energy consumption perspective, manufacturing wave energy devices demands significant fossil fuel resources. The production of specialized materials and components, such as durable plastics and metals, involves energy-intensive processes. These processes incorporate fossil fuel energy, which must be considered when evaluating the overall environmental benefits of wave energy (Hasan et al., 2019).
A further challenge is the limited number of commercially viable wave energy projects, primarily due to high capital costs and technological maturity levels, which constrain extensive deployment (Cao et al., 2021).
Critical Evaluation of Production Energy Costs
Analyzing the sustainability of wind and wave energy systems requires understanding the energy payback period—the time it takes for the system to generate the amount of energy consumed during its lifecycle. Studies indicate that wind turbines typically achieve an energy payback within 6-12 months, depending on location and technology (McKenna et al., 2020). Conversely, wave energy devices may have longer payback periods due to the complexity of their manufacturing and installation processes.
An assumption underpinning the sustainable deployment of these technologies is that the energy used in manufacturing, especially fossil fuel-based energy, does not outweigh the renewable energy they generate over their operational lifetime. For wind turbines, this assumption holds if the manufacturing energy is minimized through cleaner production methods and renewable energy sourcing for manufacturing sites (Luo et al., 2019). For wave energy, this assumption is compounded by the need for durable materials and the challenge of reducing the high energy costs associated with manufacturing components capable of withstanding marine environments.
Furthermore, the environmental safety assumption—namely, that energy systems do not significantly harm wildlife—must be examined critically. For wind turbines, bird and bat mortality rates remain a concern, while wave energy devices risk impacting marine ecosystems through physical presence and noise (Kuvlesky et al., 2007; Hasan et al., 2019). Mitigating these impacts requires technological innovations and careful site selection, which may increase production costs and thus energy consumption.
Conclusion
Both wind and wave energy present promising renewable options that can contribute significantly to reducing greenhouse gas emissions and advancing sustainable energy goals. Their advantages include low operational costs, minimal emissions, and suitability for remote locations. However, their disadvantages—intermittency, technological challenges, ecological impacts, and the fossil fuel energy embodied in manufacturing—must be carefully managed. Critical to their sustainable deployment is a comprehensive understanding of the energy costs associated with manufacturing and installation, promoting innovations that reduce reliance on fossil fuels during the lifecycle. As technological advancements continue, addressing these challenges will be essential to fully realize the environmental and economic benefits of wind and wave energy.
References
- Burke, P. J., & Planko, J. (2022). Lifecycle assessment of wind turbines: Environmental impacts and potential for renewable energy. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 154, 111824.
- Cao, H., et al. (2021). Key developments in wave energy technology: Current status and future challenges. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 164, 112022.
- Falcão, A. F. (2010). Wave energy utilization: A review of the technologies. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 14(3), 899–918.
- Global Wind Energy Council. (2022). Global Wind Report 2022. https://gwec.net/publication/global-wind-report-2022/
- Heintzelman, M. et al. (2021). Land use implications of wind turbines in rural landscapes. Environmental Management, 67, 529–543.
- Hasan, M. N., et al. (2019). Manufacturing challenges and environmental impacts of wave energy converters. Energy Conversion and Management, 185, 939–953.
- Kuvlesky, W. P., et al. (2007). Wind turbines and wildlife: An analysis of potential impacts. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 35(2), 347–352.
- Luo, X., et al. (2019). Fossil fuel dependence in renewable energy manufacturing: An analysis of wind energy. Energy Policy, 131, 238–249.
- McKenna, R., et al. (2020). Lifecycle energy analysis of wind turbines. Energy, 191, 116708.
- Milligan, M., et al. (2021). Managing variability in renewable energy systems. IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy, 12(2), 679–690.
- National Renewable Energy Laboratory. (2020). Wind energy fundamentals. https://www.nrel.gov/research/wind.html
- The World Bank. (2019). Ocean energy: Opportunities and challenges. https://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/blueeconomy/brief/ocean-energy
- World Energy Council. (2022). Global Wind Energy Status and Outlook. https://www.worldenergy.org/publications/energy-trends/