Create A Single APA 7 Compliant Research Report

Create a Single APA 7 Compliant Research Report

For this assignment, create a single, APA 7-compliant Word document that includes:

  • A proper APA 7 Title Page
  • Answer the following questions:
    • What is your approved research question from the Brainstorming Research Question HW assignment?
    • What is the title of the research article you found?
    • Does the article contain the methodology the researchers used? To receive full credit, include (a) the methodology name, (b) a paragraph from the article detailing the methodology with indicator words highlighted.
    • Does the article contain findings or results? To receive full credit, include (a) excerpt(s) from the article detailing the findings with specific words highlighted.
  • Create a proper APA 7 References Page with your one research article, following formatting guidelines.

Paper For Above instruction

The prevalence of lung cancer globally underscores the importance of effective screening and cessation interventions. Two research articles exemplify crucial strategies and findings in this domain, highlighting the significance of methodology and results in understanding lung cancer prevention and control.

Research Question

The research question derived from the brainstorming assignment is: "What have researchers learned about the effectiveness of smoking cessation and lung cancer screening interventions?" This question guides the exploration of existing studies assessing methods and outcomes related to reducing lung cancer incidence and mortality through screening programs and behavioral interventions.

Research Article 1 Details

The first article, titled “A cost-utility analysis of lung cancer screening and the additional benefits of incorporating smoking cessation interventions,” authored by Villanti et al. (2013), investigates the economic and health impacts of screening programs combined with smoking cessation strategies.

Methodology

The article explicitly details the methodology, stating, “The authors used qualitative research methods to build upon a prior simulation model to determine the utility cost of yearly, recurring LDCT screenings for the last 15 years within an assumed high-risk population of 18 million adults aged between 50 and 64 years.” The indicator words in this paragraph include “used,” “build upon,” “simulate,” “determine,” and “recurring,” which signal a qualitative, modeling approach emphasizing simulation and economic analysis.

Findings

The findings, as highlighted in the article, state, “Providing smoking cessation strategies within the yearly screening program has increased the cost-effectiveness of the disorder by between 40 and 45%.” These results emphasize the benefit of integrated intervention strategies, supported by excerpts such as “increased cost-effectiveness” and “smoking cessation strategies,” underscoring the significant impact of comprehensive programs.

Research Article 2 Details

The second article, titled “Using a smoking cessation quitline to promote lung cancer screening,” authored by Sharma et al. (2018), assesses the effectiveness of different communication strategies to encourage lung cancer screening among smokers.

Methodology

This study employed a randomized trial method, as described: “The authors performed a randomized trial involving New York State Smokers Quitline respondents to determine the impact of disseminating a brochure comprising information on benefits, risks and costs related to lung cancer screening compared to a brochure supplemented with phone-based and in-depth messaging.” Indicator words such as “performed,” “randomized trial,” “determine,” and “impact” illustrate an experimental approach, facilitating causal inference on the intervention’s efficacy.

Findings

The article reports, “The educational brochure was an effective and affordable strategy for dispensing information regarding lung cancer screening,” with specific words like “effective” and “dispensing information” highlighting the strategy’s success clearly supported by data from participant responses.

Conclusion

Both articles contribute valuable insights into lung cancer prevention through screening and behavioral interventions. The first emphasizes economic evaluation, highlighting that integrating smoking cessation into screening programs enhances cost-effectiveness, which is supported by modeling data and economic outcomes. The second highlights the importance of educational strategies, demonstrating that targeted communication can effectively inform populations about screening risks and benefits. These methodologies, backed by detailed results, are crucial for guiding public health policies aimed at reducing lung cancer mortality worldwide.

References

  • Sharma, A., Bansal-Travers, M., Celestino, P., Fine, J., Reid, M. E., Hyland, A., & O’Connor, R. (2018). Using a smoking cessation quitline to promote lung cancer screening. American Journal of Health Behavior, 42(6), 85-100.
  • Villanti, A. C., Jiang, Y., Abrams, D. B., & Pyenson, B. S. (2013). A cost-utility analysis of lung cancer screening and the additional benefits of incorporating smoking cessation interventions. PloS One, 8(8), e71379.

Related Assignments