Criminal Psychology Report Name Institution Course Professor ✓ Solved

6 Criminal Psychology Report Name Institution Course Profe

Frank Timmons is a 56-year-old male, a criminal suspect, who was referred for criminal psychology evaluation to determine his likeliness of committing the said charges (serial murderer) of criminal activities, to determine his current emotional status, his current cognitive, and his state of mind to stand trial. This report presents an unprejudiced and unbiased view and evaluation of the matter.

This criminal psychologist evaluation is free of any influence and has been done accurately, appropriately, systematically, following all legal protocols, and to the best of the expert's knowledge.

Frank has a long history of criminal engagements since his early 20s. Some of Frank's criminal activities include rape, murders, abduction, causing injuries to people, theft, and molesting. His first case, though it went unpunished, was about raping a young woman together with his brother. Later on, he was charged with trespassing, and a year later, he was also in the books for driving under the influence.

In another case, Frank was charged with abduction, bludgeoning, and brutal raping of a woman. This case sent her to prison for thirteen years against the total thirty-six years to which he was sentenced. Years after his release from prison, he was accused of child molesting behind a church in the area they were staying, and a month later, he committed his first murder. He went on to commit many other cases in a gap of eleven months, committing offenses relating to sexual assault, robbery, as well as killing a total of eight people.

Most of his friends, family members, workmates, and neighbors do not believe how such a good man might have committed such high-profile cases, and they think that he has only been framed into false offenses to put him behind bars. This criminal evaluation seeks to prove beyond a reasonable doubt whether Frank is the offender of the mentioned criminal activities, the ability of the accused to understand the charges against him and whether he is in a state to stand the relevant trial. Therefore, the evaluation will answer the question of whether he is the offender, and whether he is in a good mind and emotional state.

The study will seek to prove the null hypothesis that; Frank, the information available does not show that there is a potential motivation for Frank to commit the said crime.

Crime Assessment

In this part, we made a comparison of Frank's case with another case of serial murder by the name Aileen Wuornos. Aileen was born in February 1956 and died in 2002. She was a serial murderer in the United States and also a sex worker. In her life, she murdered seven men between 1989 and 1990 by shooting them. She claimed that she killed the men for attempting to rape or raping her, arguing that she committed such crimes for her self-defense.

Aileen's father was incarcerated when she was young for raping a young girl, which developed her negative attitude towards men. She also underwent a series of mistreatments from her grandfather, worsening her negativity towards the opposite gender. Aileen's upbringing was marred by significant trauma, contributing to her later criminal behavior.

Both Aileen and Frank have committed a long list of crimes before being convicted of murder. The following conclusions can be made from the comparison of the two cases and the motivations that they had to commit their respective crimes: both had family-related issues that could have led to antisocial behavior; negative attitudes toward a particular gender resulted in criminal activities; family-related issues could have influenced Frank's actions; alcoholism and drug abuse contributed to his behavior; and educational failure led him to engage in criminal activities.

Criminal Profile

After evaluating the details of the case and analyzing all the information, it was found that Frank Timmons did not complete his education. In his early life, Frank suffered abuse and neglect from his parents and elder sister. He failed to graduate from high school due to a lack of enough credits and faced numerous challenges in trying to provide for his family.

Frank's antisocial behavior could be genetically inherited from his family, as his father was abusive and his mother negligent. He was raised in an alcoholic environment that fostered violence and neglect, thereby weakening his emotional conscience towards others.

Motivation Factors to Frank’s Behavior

Various biological factors probably influenced Frank Timmons's behavior. One of the most significant is the genetic factor, as antisocial behavior could be inherited. Developmental issues also played a role in shaping Frank's conduct, particularly the impact of failure in education, leading him to feelings of hopelessness and subsequent criminal behavior.

Environmental factors, such as growing up in an abusive and alcoholic household, must have further distorted Frank's perception of societal norms and morality. Understanding these influences allows for a comprehensive assessment of his motivations, which may have stemmed from deep-seated psychological issues and traumatic experiences.

Conclusion

The criminal psychological evaluation concludes that there is a high probability that Frank Timmons is guilty of being a serial murderer. The reasons his friends, family, and neighbors believe he is innocent stem from his cunning behavior and his ability to manipulate perceptions. The psychological evaluation predicts that Frank's antisocial behavior will worsen over time, indicating that he poses a continued threat to society.

To mitigate future risks, strategies such as life sentences or capital punishment may be necessary to ensure that individuals like Frank do not have the opportunity to commit more crimes.

References

• Anderson, G. (2019). Biological influences on criminal behavior. CRC Press.
• Andresen, M. A. (2019). Environmental criminology: Evolution, theory, and practice. Routledge.
• Fox, B. (2017). It's nature and nurture: Integrating biology and genetics into the social learning theory of criminal behavior. Journal of Criminal Justice, 49, 22-31.
• Harris, P. (2021). Criminology and criminal justice: Theoretical perspectives. Routledge.
• Glick, J. (2018). The psychology of criminal behavior: A profile. Journal of Forensic Psychology, 15(1), 50-72.
• Smith, R. (2020). Understanding the motivations of serial offenders. Crime Science, 9(2), 45-61.
• Johnson, T. (2022). A comprehensive guide to criminal psychological evaluation. Psych Review, 34(3), 130-145.
• Lee, C. (2020). The links between childhood trauma and adult criminality. International Journal of Criminal Justice, 28(4), 112-127.
• Roberts, D. (2021). The interplay of genetics and environment in criminal behavior. Behavioral Sciences, 11(5), 350-365.
• Martin, E. (2019). Psychological assessment of serial murderers: A case study approach. Journal of Criminal Psychology, 22(3), 90-100.