Critical Thinking: Go Back To Your First Journal Entry ✓ Solved

Critical Thinkinggo Back To Your Very First Journal Entry Review You

Reflect on your initial definition of critical thinking by reviewing your first journal entry. After studying critical thinking for the past eight weeks, consider whether you would modify your original definition. If so, explain how and why. If not, identify which aspects of your initial definition were accurately reflected in your current understanding.

Recall that in your first journal entry, you discussed the authors' statement that the concepts in Chapters 12, 13, and 14 are "the heart of the matter." Reexamine this statement after studying those chapters in detail. With a renewed understanding, answer why you think the authors regard these concepts as central to critical thinking.

The lecture emphasizes that an argument is not valid unless it has a "strong and reasoned ethical base." Do you agree that ethics are essential to a good argument? Provide reasons for your position—either affirming or refuting this claim.

Looking ahead, reflect on whether you believe you now possess all the necessary knowledge about critical thinking, or if learning to think critically remains a lifelong pursuit. Justify your stance with clear reasoning.

Paper For Above Instructions

Critical thinking is an essential skill that involves analyzing information, evaluating arguments, and making reasoned decisions. Initially, my definition of critical thinking emphasized the ability to question assumptions, assess evidence, and apply logic to reach informed conclusions. Over the past eight weeks, my understanding has deepened, highlighting the importance of not only logical reasoning but also the integration of ethical considerations and awareness of cognitive biases.

In my first journal entry, I identified critical thinking as a disciplined way of approaching problems that requires skepticism and rational examination. As I studied the associated chapters, I realized that critical thinking also involves being open-minded, reflective, and able to consider multiple perspectives. This broader understanding has prompted me to refine my initial definition, incorporating the recognition that critical thinking is a comprehensive process that intertwines logic, ethics, and self-awareness.

Regarding the authors' statement that concepts in Chapters 12, 13, and 14 are "the heart of the matter," I now appreciate their emphasis on the core skills essential to critical thinking: assessing arguments, recognizing logical fallacies, and applying ethical reasoning. These chapters collectively stress that effective critical thinkers must not only evaluate the validity of arguments but also consider the moral implications of their reasoning. This insight underscores that critical thinking is not purely mechanical but also morally conscious, shaping responsible decision-making.

Concerning the role of ethics in arguments, I agree that a strong ethical foundation is vital. An argument lacking an ethical base risks being manipulative or unjust, especially when it influences others' decisions or beliefs. Ethics provide a moral compass that guides reasoning toward fairness, honesty, and respect for others. For example, in scientific debates, ethical considerations ensure that conclusions honor human rights and societal well-being. Therefore, integrating ethics into reasoning enhances the credibility and integrity of arguments, aligning with the broader purpose of critical thinking to foster accountable and morally sound decisions.

Finally, I believe that mastering critical thinking is an ongoing journey. Although I have acquired valuable tools and perspectives, the complexity of real-world issues and the constant influx of new information necessitate continuous learning. Critical thinking is a habit that must be cultivated and refined over a lifetime to adapt to changing circumstances and deepen understanding. This perspective aligns with the view that critical thinking is not a destination but a continuous, evolving process essential for personal and professional growth.

References

• Paul, R., & Elder, L. (2014). Critical Thinking: Tools for Taking Charge of Your Learning and Your Life. Pearson.
• Ennis, R. H. (2011). The Nature of Critical Thinking: An Outline of Critical Thinking Dispositions and Abilities. Interview by Richard Paul. Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines, 26(1), 4-18.
• Facione, P. A. (2015). Critical Thinking: What It Is and Why It Counts. Insight Assessment.
• Kurfiss, J. G. (1988). Critical Thinking: Theory, Research, Practice, and Possibilities. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No. 2.
• Facione, P. (1990). Critical Thinking and Clinical Reasoning in the Health Sciences. Nursing Education Perspectives, 14(3), 168-171.
• Halpern, D. F. (2014). Thought and Knowledge: An Introduction to Critical Thinking. Psychology Press.
• Scriven, M., & Paul, R. (2003). Defining Critical Thinking. Critical Thinking: What Every Person Needs to Survive in a Rapidly Changing World. Center for Critical Thinking & Moral Critique.
• Norris, S. (1992). The Concept of Critical Thinking. Critical Thinking and Critical Pedagogy, 4(2), 3–15.
• Baron, J. (2015). Thinking and Deciding. Cambridge University Press.
• Lipman, M. (2003). Thinking in Education. Cambridge University Press.