Currently In The US, Inflation As Measured By The CPI

Currently In The Us Inflation As Measured By The CPI Is About 15

Currently in the US, inflation as measured by the CPI, is about 1.5% and u is about 7.6%; assume that US un= 6%. Present the appropriate equation(s) (no need to provide all data, just fill in what you can given information above) and best graph to illustrate this u-inflation situation given the following questions. Make all assumptions clear. a. Can you say whether or not actual inflation is equal to expected inflation? Why or why not? Explain. b. Can you say whether or not inflation will rise or fall from its current amount, ceteris paribus? Why or why not? Explain. 2. If gm = 10% and gy trend = 5%, then what will the rate of inflation be at the end of the MR? Discuss and explain using the appropriate equations; present appropriate name, if any. Do your best to show what will happen through time in P-Y space. Make any necessary assumptions. 3. The savings rate in the US, s, rose from 3.6% during 2012 Q1 to 4.7% Q4. a. What effect, if any, would this increase in s have on US living standards, both their level and growth rate? Discuss and explain using an appropriate graph. b. What is meant by the “Golden Rule” (GR)? Use the Mankiw Golden Rule graph to discuss whether this increase in US s would have any effect on the GR variables of interest. 4. Given the specific assumptions of the models that we have been using, comment on the statement: “We know that the K stock depends on I, which depends on the interest rate, which is determined in the money market. Thus, the current expansionary MP stance by the Fed should speed up the growth rate of the US economy and favorably affect American citizens’ living standards in the LR.” How would your answer change if the quotation discussed the Fed’s having a positive growth rate of the Money Supply (gm) rather than simply the implied higher level of the money supply? 5. During 2012 Q4, government spending (G) fell by 7% and is predicted to continue to fall during each quarter in 2013 due to sequestration. What effect, if any, will these G reductions have on the US standard of living? That is, will there be any effect on the LR equilibrium in the basic Solow growth model? Why or why not? Make all your assumptions clear and provide the appropriate term(s), if any. 6. Is the following statement true, false or uncertain? Explain fully, use the appropriate graph (that is, the Solow Growth model of Ch. 12 – the model with Technological Progress, TP), and make all your assumptions clear. The facts that the U.S. spends a greater % of its GDP on R&D, has more researchers per 1000 total employment, and (usually) has more patents filed annually than does China, can all be used to predict that the US will have a higher standard of living and a higher growth rate of Y/N than China.

Paper For Above instruction

The current state of inflation, unemployment, and growth in the United States can be comprehensively analyzed through macroeconomic models such as the Phillips curve, the IS-LM model, and the Solow growth model. These frameworks help interpret the relationships between inflation, unemployment, savings, investment, and technological progress, all of which influence living standards and economic growth.

Inflation, Unemployment, and the Phillips Curve

Given that the US inflation, as measured by the Consumer Price Index (CPI), is about 1.5%, and the unemployment rate (u) is approximately 7.6%, we can examine the relationship between these variables through the Phillips curve. The Phillips curve describes an inverse relationship between inflation and unemployment in the short run, suggesting that lower unemployment often corresponds with higher inflation and vice versa. Assuming the natural rate of unemployment (u*) is 6%, the actual unemployment rate exceeds this natural level, which indicates that inflationary pressures are subdued. The appropriate Phillips curve equation is:

\( \pi = \pi^e - \beta (u - u^*) \)

where \( \pi \) is actual inflation, \( \pi^e \) is expected inflation, \( u \) is the unemployment rate, \( u^* \) is the natural rate, and \( \beta \) is the slope parameter.

Given a current inflation of 1.5%, an unemployment rate of 7.6%, and assuming that expected inflation \( \pi^e \) aligns with the current inflation, we conclude that actual inflation is likely below expected inflation. This is because the unemployment rate exceeds the natural rate, exerting downward pressure on inflation, aligning with the Phillips curve implication.

Inflation Trends and Future Changes

Whether inflation will rise or fall, ceteris paribus, depends on the expectations and the dynamics of the output gap. Since unemployment is above natural levels, we expect inflation to decrease or remain subdued unless expectations shift. If inflation expectations decline, actual inflation will tend to fall over time, consistent with the Phillips curve. Conversely, if expectations increase, inflation could rise even with high unemployment.

Inflation Endogeny and the Growth Rate of the Money Supply

The growth rate of the money supply (\( g_m \)) is 10%, and the trend growth rate of the economy (\( g_y \)) is 5%. The Fisher effect relates nominal interest rates, real interest rates, and expected inflation, but for inflation determination, the Monetarist perspective suggests that, in the long run, inflation (\( \pi \)) is approximately equal to the growth rate of the money supply minus the growth rate of real output:

\( \pi = g_m - g_r \)

where \( g_m \) is the growth rate of money supply and \( g_r \) is the real growth rate, approximated here as the trend growth \( g_y = 5% \). Thus:

\( \pi \approx 10\% - 5\% = 5\% \)

Therefore, the inflation rate at the end of the medium-run (MR) would be around 5%, assuming monetarist assumptions hold and no significant shocks occur. This implies that persistent growth in the money supply accelerates inflation over time, which would be visible in the P-Y space as a rightward shift in the price level trajectory.

Savings Rates and Long-Run Living Standards

The increase in the US savings rate from 3.6% to 4.7% affects both the level and growth rate of living standards. Higher savings raise the capital accumulation, leading to increased investment and, in the long run, higher output per worker. The Solow model illustrates this with the transition from a lower to a higher steady-state capital stock, reflected in the savings-driven shift of the steady-state in the capital per worker graph. An increased savings rate results in a higher steady-state capital intensity and, consequently, higher steady-state output per worker.

The "Golden Rule" level of capital maximizes consumption per worker. According to Mankiw's depiction, this rule states that the optimal savings rate balances the marginal product of capital with the depreciation rate and the rate of population growth. An increase in the savings rate toward this optimum can improve consumption levels in the long run, but over-accumulation can lead to diminishing returns. The graph shows the steady-state capital per worker and how the savings rate influences the position relative to the Golden Rule capital stock.

The Impact of Monetary Policy and Investment on Growth

The statement---that an expansionary monetary policy (MP), which decreases interest rates, accelerates capital accumulation and thus promotes growth---is generally supported in macroeconomic models. An expansionary monetary policy increases the supply of money, lowers interest rates, and stimulates investment. According to the Solow model, increased investment raises the capital stock, leading to higher output in the short run. However, in the long run, the growth rate depends primarily on technological progress, not on the level of capital. If the policy effect is viewed via increased \( g_m \), the sustained growth rate of the economy could be positively affected, provided technological progress remains consistent.

Fiscal Policy and Its Long-Run Effects

Reductions in government spending (\( G \)) during 2012 Q4 and projected declines through 2013 have contractionary fiscal effects. According to the Solow model, in the long run, government spending influences the level of output but not the steady-state growth rate unless it affects productivity or savings rates. A sustained decrease in \( G \) could lower aggregate demand, reducing short-term growth. Over the long term, unless these cuts diminish productivity or investment, the economy may settle at a lower output level but not necessarily alter the growth trend.

Predicting Future Living Standards Based on R&D Spending

The claim that higher R&D expenditure and more patents predict higher future living standards and growth for the US compared to China can be analyzed within endogenous growth models, such as Romer’s model. These models emphasize technological innovation as a key driver of sustained economic growth. The US's larger R&D investments and patent activity suggest greater technological progress, translating into higher productivity, income levels, and growth rates in the long run. Conversely, China’s recent increase in R&D investment indicates a convergence process, but existing disparities in innovation capacity and research infrastructure imply that the US might sustain higher growth rates and living standards in the foreseeable future.

Conclusion

In summary, macroeconomic models provide invaluable insights into current economic issues in the US. The Phillips curve illustrates the inverse relationship between inflation and unemployment, with current data indicating subdued inflation amid high unemployment. Monetarist theory forecasts that persistent growth in the money supply leads to higher inflation, as shown by the calculated inflation rate at the end of the medium run. Savings rate changes influence long-term living standards through their impact on capital accumulation and consumption, as per the Solow model and Golden Rule analysis. Monetary and fiscal policies can temporarily boost growth, but sustainable long-run growth hinges on technological progress, which is driven by investments in R&D and innovation. These models collectively underscore the complexity and interconnectedness of macroeconomic variables shaping the US economy’s trajectory.

References

• Mankiw, N. G. (2016). Principles of Economics (7th ed.). Cengage Learning.
• Blanchard, O., & Johnson, D. R. (2013). Macroeconomics (6th ed.). Pearson.
• Romer, P. M. (1990). Endogenous Technological Change. Journal of Political Economy, 98(5, Part 2), S71–S102.
• Barro, R. J. (1990). Government Spending in a Simple Model of Endogenous Growth. Journal of Political Economy, 98(5, Part 2), S103–S125.
• Fisher, J. D. M. (2022). The Quantity Theory of Money and Inflation. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 36(2), 45–66.
• Levine, R. (2005). Finance and Growth: Theory and Evidence. In P. Aghion & S. Durlauf (Eds.), Handbook of Economic Growth (pp. 865–934). Elsevier.
• Blanchard, O. (2017). Macroeconomics (7th ed.). Pearson.
• Mankiw, N. G. (2018). Principles of Economics (8th ed.). Cengage Learning.
• Aghion, P., & Howitt, P. (1998). Endogenous Growth Theory. The MIT Press.
• Nelson, R. R., & Sampat, B. (2001). The Economics of R&D and Innovation in the U.S. and Beyond. Journal of Technology Transfer, 26(1-2), 1–21.