Cybersecurity And Risk Management Respond To This Discussion

Cybersecurity And Risk Managementrespond To This Discussion 2 In 150 W

The first article I found when I was browsing relating to risk management to cyber security paradigms will provide a useful backdrop for evaluating the current state of consumer protection in the cyber security environment. The initial paradigm for protecting ICT systems was based on a perimeter defense model. Security focused on tightly regulating the interchange of traffic between systems. Systems were kept closed by default and opened only by exception and under conditions of tight control. This approach to security matched operational norms at the time information systems were siloed these systems were not easily interoperable and thus did not generally exchange traffic.

Under these conditions security risks were primarily internal rather than external. The second article I noticed regarding cybersecurity is the adoption of a security by design principle and certification frameworks may make it easier to neglect individual users of the Internet in the ongoing efforts to improve cybersecurity. If security concerns can be abated by focusing efforts upstream, then there may be a perception that there is less need to worry about what consumers are doing downstream. The third article I found was the language used in many national cybersecurity strategies typically is robust, though non-specific. As the examples outlined above illustrate, there is a clear contemplation that individual consumers have a role to play in cybersecurity and possibly even public duties or responsibilities.

Not but not least in the fourth article, I found that the program provides information about how home Internet users and small businesses can protect themselves online. It uses social media, a Web site, email alerts, and partnerships to deliver tips and information about cyber threats. RELATION BETWEEN CYBER SECURITY AND RISK MANAGEMENT The many consumers do not fully understand cyber security issues and do not bother to follow good cyber hygiene, there is a question whether the current consumer base will value a security certification. As indicated, the EC’s proposal for a certification framework does not contemplate mandatory compliance. The expectation is that achieving certification will give ICT service providers a competitive advantage, that is, that consumers will value the certification and thus be willing to pay more for a product or service that is verified.

Paper For Above instruction

Cybersecurity and risk management are intertwined disciplines that are vital for safeguarding information assets in today's digital economy. The four articles reviewed highlight different facets of this relationship, from foundational security paradigms to consumer engagement and policy frameworks. Historically, the perimeter defense model dominated in the initial phases of ICT security, emphasizing boundary controls and closed systems. This approach was effective when systems were siloed and internal threats were predominant. However, as technology evolved toward interconnected networks and open systems, this model became less sufficient, necessitating the adoption of more dynamic, risk-based strategies.

The "security by design" principle, as discussed in the second article, advocates integrating security measures from the inception of system development. This proactive approach reduces vulnerabilities before they emerge, but it also risks neglecting downstream users—ordinary consumers—if their role in security is undervalued. Certification frameworks aiming for security by certification attempt to create a baseline of trust and assurance, potentially influencing consumer behavior and corporate practices. Nonetheless, unless such certifications are mandatory, their impact may be limited to a competitive advantage rather than a universal standard.

National cybersecurity strategies, as noted in the third article, often employ broad, non-specific language that emphasizes collective responsibility, assigning roles to both governments and individuals. This highlights the importance of consumer awareness and good cyber hygiene in comprehensive risk management frameworks. Consumers’ limited understanding of cyber threats, coupled with passive engagement, poses a significant challenge to effective risk mitigation. Therefore, public awareness campaigns and educational initiatives are crucial components of a holistic cybersecurity strategy.

The fourth article underscores the importance of practical measures for small businesses and home users, utilizing social media, email alerts, and partnerships to disseminate cybersecurity tips. Engaging consumers directly equips them to identify threats and adopt safer practices, thereby reducing overall risk levels. An effective risk management strategy within organizations must incorporate these external, consumer-focused initiatives, recognizing that security is not solely a technical issue but also a human and organizational one.

In my role as an IT manager, I would leverage these insights by adopting a multi-layered security approach rooted in risk-based assessment. Firstly, I would ensure that security is embedded during the development phase of new systems, aligning with the security by design paradigm. Secondly, I would promote awareness programs to improve user behavior, emphasizing the importance of individual responsibility in cybersecurity. Thirdly, I would pursue reputable certification schemes to demonstrate our commitment to security, utilizing them as a marketing tool to build customer trust.

Furthermore, I would utilize advanced risk assessment models—such as fuzzy logic inference systems mentioned in the third article—to identify vulnerabilities and prioritize remediation efforts. Regular testing and updating of security measures would be part of a continuous risk management cycle, incorporating real-time threat intelligence. Policymaking within the organization would be aligned with national and international standards, ensuring compliance and fostering a security-conscious culture. Ultimately, integrating technical, organizational, and human factors as outlined in the four articles will enable me to manage IT risks effectively and protect organizational assets comprehensively.

References

• Miedema, T. E. (2018). Engaging consumers in cybersecurity. Journal of Internet Law, 21(8), 3-15.
• Schell, R. R. (2016). Cyber defense triad for where security matters. Communications of the ACM, 59(11), 20-23. https://doi.org/10.1145/
• Alali, M., Almogren, A., Hassan, M. M., Rassan, I. A., & Bhuiyan, M. A. (2018). Improving risk assessment model of cybersecurity using fuzzy logic inference system. Computers & Security. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cose.2017.09.011
• European Commission. (2019). Cybersecurity certification framework. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu
• National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). (2018). Framework for Improving Critical Infrastructure Cybersecurity. NIST.
• Anderson, R. (2020). Security engineering: A guide to building dependable distributed systems. Wiley Publishing.
• Von Solms, R., & Van Niekerk, J. (2013). From information security to cyber security. Computers & Security, 38, 97-102.
• Schneier, B. (2015). Data and Goliath: The Hidden Battles to Collect Your Data and Control Your World. W. W. Norton & Company.
• Whitman, M. E., & Mattord, H. J. (2022). Principles of Information Security. Cengage Learning.
• Kerr, I. (2019). Cybersecurity and cyber resilience: Managing risk in a digital age. MIT Press.