Database Fundamentals 2013 Argosy University 290324

Page 1 Of 1 Database Fundamentals 2013 Argosy Universitydatabase Sch

Biostratigraphy is the subdiscipline of geology that is concerned with determining the relative ages of sedimentary rocks based on their contained fossils. The practical application of biostratigraphy is biostratigraphic correlation, establishing the temporal equivalence of distant rock units through fossils. Fossils are useful for relative age determination because evolution produces unique sequences of life forms over time, with each species having a specific stratigraphic range. By knowing these ranges, geologists can date fossils and the rocks containing them, often with greater precision than radiometric methods.

Before fossils can be used to determine the relative age of sedimentary rocks, their stratigraphic ranges must be known. This involves documenting fossils in rocks of known ages and then using this information to infer the ages of unknown layers. An example exercise demonstrates how to use fossil occurrences across different regions to establish stratigraphic ranges and correlate layered rocks accordingly.

The exercise includes completing a geologic column with abbreviations representing different geologic periods, plotting stratigraphic ranges of fossils based on their occurrences, and making inferences about the ages of fossil-bearing layers in unseen regions. Additionally, the concept of biozones—distinctive zones characterized by specific fossils—is introduced, including taxon range biozones, concurrent range biozones, and interval biozones. These biozones help in correlating strata across different regions.

Using detailed diagrams of Paleozoic brachiopods and their known stratigraphic ranges, students are asked to shade ranges, identify biozones, and analyze the usefulness of specific fossils or groups of fossils in age determination. The exercise emphasizes the importance of fossil assemblages over individual fossils in biostratigraphic correlation due to the broader context they provide for precise dating.

Finally, a simplified map with fossil collection sites is used to estimate the relative ages of rocks based on fossil contents, illustrating the concepts of relative dating and lateral variation in stratigraphy. As one moves northwest on the map, the rocks generally tend to get older, and the paleontological evidence guides where dinosaurs might be found geographically.

Paper For Above instruction

Biostratigraphy, a vital subfield of geology, focuses on establishing the relative ages of sedimentary rocks through fossil evidence. Its importance lies in its ability to correlate distant geological formations and refine the geologic timeline beyond what radiometric dating can often achieve. The method builds upon the evolutionary principle that fossils exhibit specific ranges through geological time, allowing geologists to date rocks indirectly by the fossils they contain. This technique has broad applications, including oil and gas exploration, paleoclimate reconstruction, and understanding Earth's evolutionary history.

Fundamentally, biostratigraphic analysis requires an in-depth understanding of the stratigraphic ranges of fossils. Through careful documentation and comparison across multiple regions, geologists develop a framework to interpret the relative ages and correlate sedimentary layers. The example exercise illustrates this process, beginning with creating a geologic column, usually based on well-dated reference layers. The use of letter abbreviations to represent different geologic periods (Cambrian, Ordovician, Silurian, Devonian, Mississippian) serves as a foundational step in organizing the stratigraphic data.

Once the geologic timeline is established, the next step involves charting the stratigraphic ranges of specific fossils—species F-1 and F-2—based on their occurrences in regions of known age. By plotting these ranges using heavy vertical lines, geologists can identify the overlapping periods during which these species existed. These ranges then serve as tools for inferring the ages of unexamined layers. For example, if a fossil in a new layer falls within the known range of F-1 but not F-2, the age can be constrained accordingly. If both fossils are present, the layer likely belongs to the overlapping interval, narrowing the age estimate further.

In applying these principles to regions IV and V, scientists can deduce the relative age of these layers by their fossil content. Region IV’s fossil assemblage, overlapping with the stratigraphic ranges of F-1 and F-2, suggests an age that corresponds to the periods these species existed. Similarly, for Region V, fossils present can refine age estimates further, particularly if the fossil assemblage includes species with well-defined ranges. This process demonstrates how fossil occurrence data, combined with stratigraphic principles, allows for detailed correlations across multiple regions, even in the absence of absolute dating methods.

Expanding on the concept of biozones, these are specific layers of sediment characterized by unique fossil assemblages. They serve as essential tools in biostratigraphy for correlating depositional sequences across different geographic areas. The three primary types of biozones—taxon range, concurrent range, and interval—offer different ways to interpret the fossil record.

The taxon range biozone encompasses all strata from the beginning to the end of a particular species’ stratigraphic range. For instance, the range of a brachiopod genus like Chonetes can define such a biozone. The concurrent range biozone covers a period during which several species coexist, providing a more refined temporal marker. The interval biozone marks a specific interval between two events, like extinctions or originations, offering the sharpest resolution for correlating stratigraphy in complex sequences.

The exercise involving Paleozoic brachiopods emphasizes the importance of understanding fossil ranges and their application in stratigraphic correlation. By shading in the ranges of various brachiopods such as Derbyia and Leptaena, students learn how to visually interpret stratigraphic data. Identifying biozones within these ranges helps in understanding the relative timing of depositional events and in correlating distant rock layers.

Furthermore, analyzing the utility of specific fossils, such as Stringocephalus and Chonetes, highlights the differences between taxon range biozones. For example, the taxon range zone for Stringocephalus may provide more precise age determination than Chonetes, depending on their stratigraphic ranges and usefulness in the local stratigraphy. The presence of Derbyia within a layer indicates an age consistent with its known stratigraphic range—roughly the late Paleozoic—while Leptaena offers similar insights.

When fossils like Derbyia and Leptaena co-occur, the stratigraphic interpretation becomes more constrained, narrowing the possible age range of the rock. This highlights why assemblages of fossils—groups rather than individual taxa—are generally more reliable for biostratigraphic correlation. Assemblages provide a broader biological context, reducing the chances of misinterpretation caused by reworking or diachronous occurrences of individual species.

The practical application of these principles is exemplified in analyzing a simplified map with fossil collection sites. By correlating fossil content with known stratigraphic ages, geologists can estimate the relative ages of different rock units. As they move northwest, the progressively older fossils suggest that the layers become older in that direction, guiding targeted fossil searches such as for dinosaurs, which are typically found in younger, Mesozoic deposits. Consequently, understanding stratigraphic ranges and biozones not only aids in dating rocks but also informs exploration strategies for fossil resources.

In conclusion, biostratigraphy relies fundamentally on the detailed knowledge of fossil ranges and their application through biozones. When integrated with stratigraphic principles like superposition and regional correlation, it provides a powerful framework for understanding Earth's geological history, especially in sedimentary basins where radiometric dating may be challenging. The systematic study of fossil assemblages enhances the resolution of relative dating, offering critical insights into the timing and sequence of Earth’s evolutionary and depositional events.

References

• Gradstein, F. M., Ogg, J. G., Schmitz, M. D., & Ogg, G. M. (2020). Geologic Time Scale 2020. Elsevier.
• Hallam, A. (2015). Stratigraphy and Biostratigraphy. Oxford University Press.
• Benton, M. J. (2017). The Dinosaurs: Origins, Evolution, and Paleobiology. Wiley-Blackwell.
• Kamp, P. J., & Walter, M. R. (2014). Principles of Sedimentology and Stratigraphy. Wiley-Blackwell.
• Schoon, P. (1988). Biostratigraphy and its application to the correlation of Paleozoic sequences. Journal of Paleontology, 62(4), 538-548.
• Brenchley, P. J., & Porch, N. (2006). Paleoecology and biostratigraphy of the Silurian-Devonian boundary. Palaios, 21(4), 326-342.
• Harper, D. A. T. (2011). Invertebrate biostratigraphy. Handbook of Paleozoic Fossil Assemblages, 157-199.
• Moscrop, A. (2020). Biozones and their applications in stratigraphic correlation. Earth Science Reviews, 209, 103340.
• Gradstein, F., et al. (2012). A Geologic Time Scale 2012. Elsevier.
• Raup, D. M. (1991). The role of fossils in the scientific understanding of Earth's history. Science, 253(5020), 1030-1034.