Decision Making Is Itself A Very Complex Process Of Thoughts ✓ Solved

Decisionmakingisitselfaverycomplexprocessofthoughtsand Sets

Decision making is itself a very complex process of thoughts and sets up various challenges for patients and their families to make up an end-of-life care decision. Patients have a right to autonomously voice their end-of-life treatment choices, and these choices have to be respected ethically considering the use of advance treatments and their prognosis (Thorns, 2010). The purpose of the research was to explore Korean older adults’ concerns and preferences regarding end-of-life care and the expected role of physicians in the decision-making process. The purpose was to assist health care professionals, in particular, physicians, to better understand how to interact with Korean older adults (Ko, Nelson-Beker, Park & Shin, 2013).

A huge problem found with this research is the fact that patient autonomy regarding life-sustaining treatments (LST) is not taken into account. DNR options are discussed between physicians and family members, excluding patients from their right to decide, leading to conflicts without knowing what patients want. Physicians and family members may conclude that patients experiencing an end-of-life situation do not wish to pursue further treatment, making decisions without consulting them, rather than asking patients about their wishes. It is crucial for health care professionals not to assume patients’ end-of-life wishes based on particular cultural values; rather, they need to inquire about individual preferences for end-of-life care.

The hypothesis of this study suggests that while some Korean individuals may want their family members to make their end-of-life decisions for them, whether that means extending life or opting for no further treatment, the majority of study participants underscored the importance of physicians’ roles in guiding patients to make good end-of-life decisions. Many participants viewed quality of life as more important than extending life. However, since the study only addressed residents of senior centers, it may lack validity, as end-of-life decisions impact individuals of all ages. People living with serious illness or those who are institutionalized might have a different perspective on end-of-life care.

Additionally, this study is over a decade old and may reflect earlier common thoughts on the best practices of the time. For the past few decades, patient-informed consent and physician-patient communication have been emphasized as standard ethical guidelines in Korea. The article titled "End-of-Life decision making in older Korean adults: Concerns, preferences, and expectations" highlights a study of end-of-life care for older Korean adults, aiming to help health care professionals understand the older Korean adult and assist with their end-of-life care (Ko, E., Nelson-Becker, H., Park, Y., & Shin, M., 2013). In nursing, interactions with diverse cultural groups are essential, making this study pertinent to practice. Understanding how to engage with specific cultural groups significantly influences patients’ outcomes and experiences in care.

The hypothesis presented is a restatement of the research question, emphasizing the necessity to comprehend concerns and preferences regarding end-of-life care among Korean older adults and the importance of aiding them in planning care within a cultural framework (Ko, E., Nelson-Becker, H., Park, Y., & Shin, M., 2013).

The study's objectives were to determine and evaluate the problems hindering older Korean adults from making and participating in their end-of-life decisions. Ethical concerns were explored, alongside Korean attitudes toward doctors discussing their care. The research problem is end-of-life care and cultural perspectives for the identified population. The lack of legal guidance and collaboration often results in a deficiency of patient involvement in decision-making, with family members typically assuming a crucial role, sometimes excluding patients entirely.

Ethical background and beliefs significantly influence decision-making. Many study participants regard quality of life as more important than merely extending life, aligning with findings from previous studies (Ko, E., Nelson-Becker, H., Park, Y., & Shin, M., 2013). This study demonstrates high credibility and validity, utilizing 54 subjects to conduct in-person interviews, adding to the accuracy and timeliness of the data. A diverse range of sociodemographic variables such as age, income, education, marital status, religious affiliation, and religiosity were included, which not only strengthens the study's validity but also ensures a broad spectrum of perspectives (Ko, E., Nelson-Becker, H., Park, Y., & Shin, M., 2013).

Furthermore, the involvement of four different authors contributes to the credibility of the study. This collaboration likely enriched the research design, analysis, and interpretation. The findings of this research entail essential implications for both the medical community and social care providers, emphasizing the necessity of tailored approaches to end-of-life decision-making processes.

Paper For Above Instructions

Decision making at the end of life is a multifaceted and complex process that poses significant challenges for both patients and their families. In healthcare, it is essential to address these challenges compassionately and ethically. This paper explores the research findings regarding end-of-life care preferences among Korean older adults, the implications for medical professionals, and the broader cultural contexts that shape decision-making.

Firstly, autonomy is a pivotal principle in healthcare ethics, especially concerning end-of-life decisions. Patients have the right to make informed choices regarding their treatment. Autonomy, rooted in the ethical frameworks, emphasizes that patients should have the capacity to make decisions regarding life-sustaining treatments (LST) without undue influence. Unfortunately, research identifies the systemic exclusion of patients from conversations about their care, wherein DNR (Do Not Resuscitate) discussions occur primarily between physicians and family members, often overlooking the patient’s voice. Such practices raise ethical concerns, as they may lead to decisions that do not align with the patient’s wishes or values (Thorns, 2010). Therefore, it is crucial for healthcare providers to actively solicit and respect patients’ preferences in their end-of-life care planning.

Moreover, a critical finding of the study is that many Korean individuals prefer involving their families in end-of-life decision-making. However, this does not diminish the importance of including the patients themselves in these discussions. The notion that older adults might wish to defer decision-making to family members stems from cultural values such as filial piety and respect (Ko et al., 2013). Yet, as this study suggests, the majority of participants expressed a desire for physicians to guide them through the decision-making process, highlighting that the quality of life is often prioritized over the mere extension of life. The role of healthcare professionals, especially physicians, is thus paramount in facilitating these conversations respectfully and effectively.

Additionally, cultural nuances profoundly influence how decisions are made in end-of-life care. The research highlights the importance of understanding cultural backgrounds when addressing the end-of-life preferences of older Korean adults. For instance, ethical beliefs and familial expectations play significant roles in shaping what patients consider acceptable or desirable treatment options (Ko et al., 2013). Therefore, healthcare providers must demonstrate cultural competence, engaging with patients and families in ways that reflect their values and beliefs, rather than imposing external standards or assumptions.

Furthermore, it is essential to recognize the limitations of the current research, as it mainly focused on residents of senior centers, which may not represent the entire spectrum of older adults facing end-of-life decisions across various living situations. Excluding those with serious illnesses outside institutional settings may overlook critical perspectives regarding end-of-life care (Ko et al., 2013). Therefore, methodologies should incorporate voices from diverse populations to ensure comprehensive understanding and representation.

Another crucial aspect emphasized in the study is the need for better legal guidance and collaborative efforts in end-of-life care planning. The lack of defined legal parameters often leads to paternalistic approaches to patient care, wherein medical professionals or family members make decisions on behalf of patients (Ko et al., 2013). To address these issues, an advocacy for policy reforms and legal frameworks that support patient autonomy and collaborative decision-making in end-of-life care is paramount.

In conclusion, understanding the complexities of decision-making at the end of life among Korean older adults offers valuable insights for healthcare practitioners. It underscores the need to prioritize patient autonomy, facilitate effective communication, and respect cultural values. By fostering an environment where patients feel empowered to express their preferences regarding end-of-life care and encouraging family involvement, healthcare providers can enhance the quality of care and ultimately generate better outcomes for patients in their final days.

References

• Ko, E., Nelson-Becker, H., Park, Y., & Shin, M. (2013). End-of-Life decision making in older Korean adults: Concerns, preferences, and expectations. Journal of Aging Studies, 27(1), 71-80.
• Thorns, A. (2010). Ethical dilemmas in end-of-life decision-making. Palliative Medicine, 24(9), 892-894.
• Braun, U. K., & Satcher, S. (2007). End-of-life decision-making: Clinical and ethical challenges. Lancet, 369(9578), 2263.
• Fitzgerald, E., & Charland, L. (2017). Cultural considerations in end-of-life care. American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine, 34(9), 853-859.
• Gonzalez, A. C., & O’Brien, J. (2019). Attorneys' perspectives on legal aspects of end-of-life decision-making. Journal of Health Care Law & Policy, 22(2), 249-267.
• Inoue, K., & Morita, T. (2008). Community-based palliative care in Japan: Past, present, and future. Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology, 38(9), 599-603.
• Johnson, M. R., & VandeKappelle, M. (2014). The role of family in end-of-life decision making: An ethical dilemma. Ethics & Behavior, 24(3), 217-224.
• Kessels, C. M., et al. (2015). The effectiveness of structured decision aids in end-of-life decision making: A systematic review. Patient Education and Counseling, 98(3), 485-492.
• Winkler, E. A., & Wittenberg, E. G. (2022). Cultural competence in end-of-life care: Implications for practice and research. Journal of Palliative Medicine, 25(4), 534-541.
• Zhang, Y., & Xu, Y. (2021). The role of culture in end-of-life care decision-making: A focus on Asian populations. BMC Palliative Care, 20(1), 1-8.