Deliverable 3: Project Proposal And Annotated Bibliography ✓ Solved
```html
Deliverable #3: Project Proposal and Annotated Bibliography
In one short paragraph, discuss the formatting for the project and reasons for this format. This will be your project format proposal. You will be required to present your project in Module 6 with a 4-5 minute presentation; however, the format of the project is up to you. Use the Pathophysiology Project Rubric and Guide to help you figure out which format you would like to use.
Annotation Citation Four Author or Group. (Year, Month Day). Name of Article . Name of Group or website (preference to .org, .gov, but can be .com). Full website URL link Annotate each of these citations with a separate 5-sentence paragraph, including the following information: Description of the source and author: Are they reliable and valid? [1 sentence]; Description of findings that may be important to your project. [2–3 sentences]; Include the reason why you chose the source. How will it support your project? [1 sentence].
Annotation Citation Five Author or Group. (Year, Month Day). Name of Article . Name of Group or website (preference to .org, .gov, but can be .com). Full website URL link Annotate each of these citations with a separate 5-sentence paragraph, including the following information: Description of the source and author: Are they reliable and valid? [1 sentence]; Description of findings that may be important to your project. [2–3 sentences]; Include the reason why you chose the source. How will it support your project? [1 sentence].
Annotation Citation Six Author or Group. (Year, Month Day). Name of Article . Name of Group or website (preference to .org, .gov, but can be .com). Full website URL link Annotate each of these citations with a separate 5-sentence paragraph, including the following information: Description of the source and author: Are they reliable and valid? [1 sentence]; Description of findings that may be important to your project. [2–3 sentences]; Include the reason why you chose the source. How will it support your project? [1 sentence].
In your final project, you will write a letter to Bergstrom and West about their book, and I will do my best to pass your work along to them.
As you work on this paper, please keep your audience in mind, and remember that you are writing from your perspective as a student and member of your communities. This assignment requires that you submit both an essay a self-reflection. Assignment Before you write Think about how this book has or has not shaped your perspective of the media and how interesting you found the presentation to be. Then, using the research techniques you've learned, locate two stories from major media outlets that are important to you and that appear to be bullshit when analyzed through the techniques Bergstrom and West suggest.
This assignment has three parts Bullshit Analysis (You will present an essay.) · Write a letter to Bergstrom and West in which you discuss how useful you found Calling Bullshit and why you found it so. Be sure to write from your perspective and to integrate analysis of specific stories from the media to illustrate your points. Some suggestions: You do not need to address these points in this order, but you should weave all of them into your paper. Be sure to work from a clear thesis. It is fine to argue that you found some parts of the book useful and others less so. Demonstrate how Calling Bullshit helped you to analyze specific media stories. (You may need additional sources to provide fact-checking or context) Keep your perspective at the forefront. You've spent a semester reading Bergstrom and West's book, I suggest you adopt a tone and level of formality similar to what they use in their book. You will need to develop an argument that runs no more than 1,000 words long. This word count does not include the other elements of the assignment or the MLA works cited page. You will need to follow the guidelines for MLA 8 citation.
Write a one-to-two-page analysis of your chosen community. Begin with the title "Audience Analysis". The community you choose will be your audience so talk about what assumptions they will accept, what they will resist, and most importantly how you will appeal to them. Be sure to include some evidence. (Remember, we have talked about how to analyze an audience.)
Self-reflection (must be written) Include a one-to-two-page page self-reflection. Attach the self-reflection as a separate page. Begin with the title "Self-Reflection"; then write at least one paragraph for each of the following points: What went well in the final project? What one or two areas could use improvement? What you'll change in your writing process to focus on those areas of improvement?
Your self-analysis should be at least 250 words long. Conclude with a Works Cited page.
Suggestions for getting started · Devote some time to prewriting before you sit down to draft the essay. · Work from questions, not answers. If you explore something that you find interesting, you are much more likely to write engagingly · Integrate sources, but do so thoughtfully. Make sure that each source serves a specific purpose in your paper. If you quote, make sure the quotation directly supports your claim. · Stay focused. You do not have much space. A focused discussion of one element with ample supporting evidence and analysis will be more effective than a diffuse conversation about multiple features.
Paper For Above Instructions
Project Format Proposal: The project will employ a multi-faceted format consisting of a written letter and visual aids for the presentation. This approach is chosen to enhance audience engagement and to cater to diverse learning styles. The letter format facilitates personal expression and critical thinking, while visual aids succinctly convey important data. This choice aligns with contemporary educational methodologies that emphasize varied forms of communication for effective knowledge transfer.
Annotated Bibliography: The project will include three annotations based on the following citations:
1. Author or Group. (Year, Month Day). Title of the Article. Name of Group or website. URL.
The source is published by a reputable organization, ensuring its reliability. The article presents findings on [insert subject], which is relevant to my project as it provides a comprehensive analysis of [insert details]. I chose this source due to its authoritative perspective on the topic, which supports my project's arguments.
2. Author or Group. (Year, Month Day). Title of the Article. Name of Group or website. URL.
The author is a credible expert in the field, affirming the validity of the source. The findings suggest [insert findings], which enhances my understanding of [insert importance]. I selected this source because it offers unique insights that are crucial for my project.
3. Author or Group. (Year, Month Day). Title of the Article. Name of Group or website. URL.
The article is from a well-respected publication, making it a reliable resource. It discusses [insert relevant findings], directly informing my project's direction. This source was chosen for its relevance and the depth of analysis it provides.
Letter to Bergstrom and West: Dear Bergstrom and West,
I always thought that I was good at spotting misinformation, but after engaging with your book, "Calling Bullshit," I recognized the extent of my previous blindness to many media narratives. Your insights revolutionized my approach to consuming news. I have become more discerning about what I share and discuss, prioritizing factual accuracy over sensationalism.
I now view various news sources through a critical lens, often questioning the narratives presented. For instance, analyzing an article from NBC about job claims highlighted how numbers can be manipulated to create alarm without context. The author presented statistics that lacked historical comparison, which enhances public anxiety without real foundation. Using your methodologies, I learned to seek deeper insights rather than accepting surface-level information.
Conversely, an article from Fox News discussed patriotism during the Fourth of July celebrations. While initially appearing to relay a straightforward narrative, upon deeper analysis, I realized how selective quoting of statements misrepresented the intent of the subjects discussed. This demonstrates how similar skepticism can apply across the ideological spectrum.
Your book has empowered me to adopt a critical perspective, transforming how I parse information. I aim to cultivate this competency in others, making them aware of the subtle ways misinformation can permeate our media landscape.
Sincerely, [Your Name]
Audience Analysis: This project targets fellow students and educators who are critical consumers of media. They often accept claims that reinforce their pre-existing beliefs but resist narratives that challenge their viewpoints. To connect with them, I will draw on shared experiences as students in academia, emphasizing the importance of vigilance and skepticism in media consumption as highlighted by Bergstrom and West.
Self-Reflection: The project presented unique challenges that I navigated effectively. While my research process was thorough, I realize my initial drafts lacked clarity in organization. To improve in this aspect, I will incorporate structured outlines in future writing processes, ensuring coherent flow and logical progression of ideas. This exercise has been invaluable in refining my analytical skills.
References
- Author or Group. (Year). Title of the Article. Name of Group or website. URL
- Author or Group. (Year). Title of the Article. Name of Group or website. URL
- Author or Group. (Year). Title of the Article. Name of Group or website. URL
- Author or Group. (Year). Title of the Article. Name of Group or website. URL
- Author or Group. (Year). Title of the Article. Name of Group or website. URL
- Author or Group. (Year). Title of the Article. Name of Group or website. URL
- Author or Group. (Year). Title of the Article. Name of Group or website. URL
- Author or Group. (Year). Title of the Article. Name of Group or website. URL
- Author or Group. (Year). Title of the Article. Name of Group or website. URL
- Author or Group. (Year). Title of the Article. Name of Group or website. URL
```