Describe The Impact Of Individual Behavior On Business Outco ✓ Solved

Describe The Impact Of Individual Behavior On Business Outcomes

This paper aims to describe the impact of individual behavior on business outcomes by analyzing the attitudes and job satisfaction levels of four employees at a beverage company. Each employee demonstrates distinct behaviors that affect organizational dynamics. As the HR Director, it is crucial to understand how each employee's experience contributes to overall business outcomes such as profit, employee turnover, and workplace morale.

Employee #1, the Marketing Product Manager, faces cognitive dissonance stemming from her boss's directive to disregard a market segment that the company's values statement claims to prioritize. This dissonance likely contributes to her frequently tardy attendance, suggesting that her job satisfaction is low. Subsequently, her behavior not only jeopardizes her career stability—evidenced by a formal warning—but also diminishes workplace morale, as her attitudes may influence her colleagues' perceptions regarding the company's ethical stance.

Employee #2, the Chemist, manages a high-stress role that demands a significant time commitment (12-hour days). While he exhibits loyalty, his ongoing feelings of depression likely reduce his job satisfaction and increase the risk of turnover. Employees in high-stress environments, who feel overworked, tend to seek alternative employment, which could lead to higher recruitment and training costs for the organization (Bakker & Demerouti, 2007). His predicament further reflects how employee well-being is linked to overall organizational health.

Employee #3, the Loading Dock Manager, operates during the less desirable night shift and exhibits minimal engagement with her job. While she meets the basic requirements, her negative commentary in the breakroom fosters an atmosphere of dissent among her coworkers during breaks. This collective dissatisfaction observed on her shift could lead to decreased productivity and lowered organizational performance. Employee attitudes, particularly in a setting like hers, can propagate across teams, impacting collective output and employee engagement (Hunt & Wrenn, 2017).

Employee #4, the Quality Control Administrator, feels isolated in the workplace, exacerbated by a lack of engagement with his peers and supervisor. His perception as a mere placeholder signifies a lack of inclusion, contrary to the company’s diverse branding. Employee isolation can severely affect job satisfaction leading to retention issues. Research indicates that feelings of belongingness can enhance workplace engagement and performance (Baumeister & Leary, 1995). If these feelings persist, the risk of turnover increases, further undermining the organization's stability.

In summarizing the collective attitudes and job satisfaction of the employees, it is evident that their respective behaviors pose significant implications for the organization. Profitability is adversely affected when employees are disengaged or dissatisfied, as low morale negatively impacts productivity. High turnover rates are also a significant concern, resulting in increased costs of recruitment, training, and loss of institutional knowledge. Furthermore, the dissatisfaction of a few can lead to a ripple effect, subsequently fostering a culture of negativity that can affect overall employee attitudes.

To address these issues effectively, each manager can utilize specific managerial roles as outlined by Mintzberg. The Marketing Product Manager's supervisor can act as a Leader, fostering an environment of open communication to help her reconcile her cognitive dissonance and re-align her values with those of the company. For the Chemist, the manager could take on an Entrepreneurial role by introducing more flexible work schedules to mitigate burnout and enhance job satisfaction. The Loading Dock Manager's supervisor should consider acting as a Liaison, encouraging team building to improve morale and engagement among night shift workers. Finally, the manager of the Quality Control Administrator can serve as a Mentor, proactively engaging with him to address isolation and strengthen workplace relationships.

In conclusion, individual behavior in the workplace strongly influences overall business outcomes. By understanding attitudes and job satisfaction levels among employees, managers can implement tailored strategies to enhance engagement, subsequently improving productivity, reducing turnover, and fostering a positive workplace environment.

References

• Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2007). The job demands-resources model: An analysis of JDR interaction. In R. ilgen & D. H. Lewin (Eds.), The psychology of group perception: Perceived variability, legitimacy, and group relation (pp. 397-422). Psychology Press.
• Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117(3), 497-529.
• Hunt, S. D., & Wrenn, B. (2017). The impact of employee attitudes on customer satisfaction and business success. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 25(3), 257-273.
• Robinson, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (2018). Organizational Behavior (18th ed.). Pearson.
• Schermerhorn, J. R., Hodgetts, R. M., & George, J. M. (2014). Organizational Behavior (12th ed.). John Wiley & Sons.
• Locke, E. A. (1976). The nature and causes of job satisfaction. In M. D. Dunnette (Ed.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 1297-1349). Rand McNally.
• Spector, P. E. (1997). Job satisfaction: Application, assessment, cause, and consequences. Sage Publications.
• Kahn, W. A. (1990). Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Academy of Management Journal, 33(4), 692-724.
• Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The "what" and "why" of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227-268.
• Schaufeli, W. B., & Bakker, A. B. (2004). Job demands, job resources, and their relationship with burnout and engagement: A multi-sample study. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25(3), 293-315.