Describe The Type Of Conflict Illustrated In The Scenario
Describe the type of conflict illustrated in the scenario.
Read the following scenario: Emma and Isabella attend the front office at an urgent care facility. They have worked together for over five years and enjoy collaborating on projects. Their manager has asked them to collaborate by creating a team training for effective communication in the workplace. Emma and Isabella will be responsible for creating and delivering the training to the staff at the facility. Emma feels that it is important to provide hands-on learning while Isabella feels lecture would be the most appropriate format for this team. Emma defends her point by saying that her sister has been a teacher for 10 years, and she has proven that hands-on learning will increase the engagement and likelihood of remembering the training material. Isabella feels that Emma does not account for her 10 years of experience in the medical office and voices her disgust with Emma and her lack of appreciation for her experience. Isabella storms off and leaves Emma to finish the work. Emma approaches the manager and complains that she has been left to complete the training because Isabella refuses to talk or work with her.
Paper For Above instruction
The scenario illustrates a clear example of interpersonal conflict rooted in differences in communication styles and perceived value of experience. This type of conflict often arises when individuals have incompatible approaches or ideas, which generate tension and negatively impact collaboration. Specifically, Emma advocates for a hands-on learning approach, citing her sister’s teaching expertise, emphasizing experiential methods to enhance engagement. Conversely, Isabella prefers a lecture-based format, which she believes aligns better with her practical experience in the medical office. The clash of perspectives, coupled with personal feelings about each other's competencies, results in a hostile environment where dialogue breaks down, exemplified by Isabella’s storming off and Emma’s subsequent complaint to management.
This conflict can be classified as task-related or relationship conflict, with the latter playing a significant role due to personal judgments and emotional reactions. Task conflict pertains to disagreements over work procedures or ideas, such as the training format, but when characters take these disagreements personally, it escalates into relationship conflict, involving trust, respect, and emotional hurt. In this scenario, Emma perceives Isabella's behavior as dismissive, while Isabella feels undervalued and disrespected, leading to a defensive climate characterized by suspicion, defensiveness, and withdrawal. Such an environment hampers effective communication and creates barriers to resolving the underlying issues.
The unresolved conflict and ensuing defensiveness threaten the future working relationship of Emma and Isabella. A defensive climate fosters mistrust, hampers open communication, and diminishes team cohesion. If not addressed, this can snowball, affecting the broader team by reducing collaborative efforts, increasing tensions, and lowering morale. For clinic staff, particularly those involved in the training process, persistent discord may lead to reduced productivity, less effective teamwork, and deteriorated interpersonal relations. For patients, or clinic consumers, this discord can result in decreased quality of care due to poor teamwork, miscommunication, and potential errors, thus undermining the clinic’s reputation and service delivery.
Effective conflict resolution strategies, such as mediated dialogue, active listening, and focusing on shared goals, are essential to restore a supportive climate. The manager could facilitate a discussion where Emma and Isabella express their perspectives and feelings without judgment, emphasizing the common goal of delivering effective staff training. Encouraging empathy and understanding can help each party recognize the merit in the other's viewpoint. Conflict management training and establishing clear team roles and communication protocols can prevent future misunderstandings. Restoring trust and mutual respect is crucial to promoting a positive work environment that benefits both employees and patients.
References
Burke, R. J., & Cooper, C. L. (Eds.). (2006). The organizational helm: Managing conflict in the workplace. Routledge.
De Dreu, C. K., & Weingart, L. R. (2003). Task versus relationship conflict, team performance, and team member satisfaction: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(4), 741–749. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.4.741
Jehn, K. A. (1995). A multimethod examination of the benefits and detriments of intragroup conflict. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40(2), 256–282. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393638
Rahim, M. A. (2002). Toward a theory of managing organizational conflict. International Journal of Conflict Management, 13(3), 206–235.
Thomas, K. W., & Kilmann, R. H. (2007). The Thomas-Kilmann Conflict Mode Instrument. Xicom.
Mayer, B. (2000). The dynamics of conflict: A guide to engagement and intervention. Jossey-Bass.
Simons, T. L., & Peterson, R. S. (2000). Task conflict and relationship conflict: The effects on team performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(1), 102–111.
Tjosvold, D. (1998). Cooperative and competitive goal meanings for interdependence and conflict in organizations. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 47(3), 285–313.
Ury, W. (1991). Getting past no: Negotiating in difficult situations. Bantam Books.