Description Of Research Methodology In This Assignment ✓ Solved

Description of Research Methodology In this assignment Y

In this assignment, you will write an essay about the research methods and ethical implications of a social psychology study. You will select an entry from the SPARQ "Solutions Catalog," which is maintained by Stanford University, and base your analysis solely on this source and your course materials.

Your paper should be 2-3 pages long and start with an introductory statement that clearly identifies the chosen SPARQ article and its corresponding research article, modeled after the provided example. Use proper APA in-text citations for both the SPARQ article (noted as “n.d.” if undated) and the original research publication, even if you have not read the original paper.

Summarize the main details of the study, including the research method used (e.g., case study, experiment, observation). Evaluate whether the methodology was appropriate for the research aims, providing a rationale for your judgment. Discuss if this method generally provides the most comprehensive information in social psychology research, supporting your argument with reasons.

Explain the major ethical considerations of the study, such as informed consent and debriefing, and assess whether you believe the study was conducted ethically, including your rationale.

Include a reference section with correctly formatted APA citations for both sources used in your introduction. The formatting should follow APA conventions, with the references matching the in-text citations.

The assignment must be typed in Times New Roman font size 12, double-spaced, with one-inch margins, and include a cover page with the title, your name, your professor’s name, course title, and date. The cover page and references are not part of the 2-3 page length requirement.

Sample Paper For Above instruction

The article I selected from the SPARQ website is entitled “Boost Grades by Reframing Failures” (Wilson, n.d.), which summarizes a research article (Wilson & Linville, 1982) on the topic of student motivation and attribution theory.

This study employed an experimental research method to investigate how students’ perceptions of failure influence their motivation to improve academic performance. The researchers used a laboratory experiment involving college students, where participants were assigned to different attribution conditions after experiencing academic setbacks. The experimental design allowed the researchers to manipulate the students’ attributions of failure—for example, whether they viewed failure as due to lack of effort or lack of ability—and measured subsequent motivation levels and performance.

I believe the experimental methodology was appropriate for this research because it permitted the researchers to directly assess the causal effects of attribution styles on motivation. By controlling the experimental variables, the researchers could isolate the specific impact of attributional framing on students’ responses to failure, thus providing clear evidence of causality. Generally, experiments are considered the gold standard for establishing causal relationships in social psychology, and in this case, the method effectively provided detailed insights into the psychological processes involved.

Regarding ethical considerations, the study adhered to standard ethical guidelines, including obtaining informed consent from participants and debriefing them afterward about the purpose of the experiment. Given the minimal risk posed and the transparency in participants’ involvement, the study appears to have been conducted ethically. The debriefing ensured that participants understood the purpose of the study and alleviated any potential distress caused by the experimental manipulation.

In conclusion, this study effectively employed an experimental methodology appropriate for investigating causal relationships in social psychology. It also demonstrated adherence to ethical standards, ensuring participant welfare while providing valuable insights into motivation and attribution theory.

References

• Wilson, T. D. (n.d.). Boost grades by reframing failures. Retrieved from [URL]
• Wilson, T. D., & Linville, P. W. (1982). Improving the academic performance of college freshmen: Attribution therapy revisited. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42(2), 329-338.