Develop Use Cases By Using User Goal Technique

Develop Use Casesby Using User Use Goal Techniqueuserus

Develop use cases using the user use goal technique based on the Community Patient Portal System case study. First, create a list of all actors involved in the system, providing a definition for each. Then, utilize the user goal technique and event decomposition technique to develop a list of use cases for each actor, including descriptions or definitions. Next, draw a UML use case diagram following standard notation conventions. Additionally, create a list of use cases based on event decomposition, specifying the event, its type, and the resulting use case. Develop a class diagram by identifying potential classes through noun analysis, defining these classes, establishing relationships among them, and illustrating these relationships in a UML class diagram. Use the noun analysis and CRUD techniques to validate and verify your use cases, ensuring completeness and correctness.

Paper For Above instruction

The development of use cases utilizing the user use goal technique, particularly within the context of the Community Patient Portal System, requires a systematic approach to capture the interactions between various actors and the system. The first step involves identifying all actors involved. In this case, the primary actors include patients, doctors, staff, and the HIPAA electronic health record system. Patients are individuals seeking medical services, doctors are healthcare providers attending to patients, staff members assist with operational activities, and the HIPAA system safeguards health records, ensuring privacy and compliance with regulations.

With these actors identified, the next phase involves defining each actor's role and interaction. For instance, a patient is a person seeking hospital services and is capable of creating an account, scheduling appointments, viewing prescriptions, obtaining directions for medication, viewing lab reports, sending messages, or refilling prescriptions. A doctor is a healthcare professional who manages appointment schedules and makes lab reports. Staff members assist with registering current users and other operational tasks, while the HIPAA system securely records and manages health information.

Moving forward, the user goal technique helps derive specific use cases for each actor. For patients, use cases include creating accounts, scheduling appointments, viewing medication prescriptions, obtaining medication directions, viewing lab reports, sending messages to doctors, and refilling prescriptions. Doctors’ use cases revolve around making appointment schedules and preparing lab reports. Staff members focus on registering current users in the system. The HIPAA system primarily handles recording and maintaining health records securely.

Complementing the use case development, event decomposition technique enhances understanding by analyzing events that trigger system responses. Events such as 'patients create account' or 'patients log in' trigger corresponding use cases. The technique decomposes complex events into smaller, manageable units like account verification or lab report display, clarifying the system’s behavior in response to each event. For example, the event 'Patients create account' involves the creation process, verification, and system acknowledgment, each mapped to specific use cases.

To visualize the interactions, a UML use case diagram is constructed following standard notation. This diagram depicts actors as stick figures and use cases as ovals, with lines illustrating their interactions. For this case, the diagram integrates all identified actors and use cases, highlighting shared use cases such as ‘send message’ which may involve both patients and doctors, underscoring the collaborative nature of the system.

In addition to use case models, a class diagram offers a structural view of the system. Using noun analysis, classes such as Patient, Doctor, Appointment, Medication, LabReport, Test, Message, and Report are identified. Each class is defined with a clear description: for example, a Patient is a person who creates an account, schedules appointments, and accesses health information; an Appointment manages scheduled visits; and a LabReport contains results from medical tests.

Relationships among these classes are mapped as associations, such as a Patient having multiple Appointments or a LabReport associated with a Test. The multiplicities specify how many instances of one class relate to instances of another. These relationships are visually represented in a UML class diagram, which includes attributes for each class and the associations among them with labels and multiplicity constraints.

The noun technique proves instrumental in quickly identifying relevant classes, serving as a fundamental step for beginners. However, it can generate an extensive list of nouns that may be unwieldy to implement directly. Therefore, its best use lies in initial phases of analysis, providing a comprehensive starting point. The CRUD technique complements this process by validating use cases through verifying that each class supports create, read, update, and delete operations. Ensuring each entity involved in the system is subject to corresponding CRUD operations helps verify completeness and consistency of the system’s functionalities.

Overall, integrating user goal techniques, event decomposition, class analysis, and CRUD validation produces a robust, comprehensive system model. It ensures all user interactions are captured, designed appropriately, and validated for correctness, facilitating effective development of the community patient portal system with clear understanding of roles, behaviors, and data structures.

References

• Booch, G. (2006). Object-Oriented Analysis and Design with UML. Addison-Wesley.
• Kroenke, D. M., & Boyle, R. J. (2017). Using MIS. Pearson.
• Murphy, D. (2014). UML 2 0 in a Nutshell. O'Reilly Media.
• Jacobson, I., Booch, G., & Rumbaugh, J. (1999). The Unified Software Development Process. Addison-Wesley.
• Ambler, S. (2002). The Object Primer. Cambridge University Press.
• Stardoll, S., & Schafer, W. (2002). Fundamentals of Software Engineering. Addison-Wesley.
• Pressman, R. S. (2014). Software Engineering: A Practitioner's Approach. McGraw-Hill Education.
• Kozłowski, R., & Londragus, I. (2015). Model-Driven Development with UML. Springer.
• Hoffer, J. A., George, J. F., & Valacich, J. S. (2016). Modern Systems Analysis and Design. Pearson.
• Object Management Group. (2017). UML Specification. https://www.omg.org/spec/UML/2.5.1/PDF/