Developmental Science Focuses On Various Contributions
Developmental Science Focuses On The Various Contributions To Developm
Developmental science focuses on the various contributions to development, and whether they lean toward the genetic side of things (nature) or environmental (nurture). Choose from one of the following topics discussed in the modules: child obesity, eating disorders, adolescent depression. For this paper, review the module material on your specific topic. Then, write a paper describing in detail the “nature” (primarily genetic, inherited) contributions to this condition as well as the “nurture” contributions. You will need to conduct Internet research and cite the sources to obtain additional information on your topic. For example, explaining the inherited reasons for a child to be obese will require that you visit, read, summarize, and cite medical sites on the Internet.
It is crucial that you rephrase material in your own words and cite it or put phrases from the sources in quotation marks and cite them. No more than a few sentences should be directly quoted in order for you to receive credit for writing this paper (in other words, no credit is given for a paper that is a string of other people’s quotes). As a general rule of thumb, at least 1.5 pages should focus on "nature" contributions to the issue at hand and at least 1.5 pages should focus on "nurture" contributions. Your research must include at least two journal articles or books. Websites can be very helpful and informative, but your final paper must include full, published research articles or books on the topic.
Sources should be reputable and consistent with what you learned in the module as well as other sources. Google Scholar and PDF articles from the Internet can be helpful resources. Make sure you use good search terms when trying to find articles. You may want to start broad (for example, “bystander effect”), and then narrow to your particular area. This paper requirement means that you need to include at least two primary sources in your paper; articles from the Internet can be included, but they would be in addition to the two minimum primary sources.
Primary sources are firsthand accounts; thus, they involve the author writing about his or her own work. It is recommended that you spend at least a page and a half discussing “nature” for this topic and a page and a half discussing “nurture.” Finally, conclude the paper by indicating which side (nature, nurture) gives the strongest contribution to this condition or whether they are both needed. For example, for child obesity, is genetics alone a sufficient cause for a child to be obese, or are poor eating habits necessary along with a genetic predisposition? The paper should follow the following format: I. Introduction. Introduce your topic. II. Description and research on “nature” components III. Description and research on “nurture” components IV. Evaluation: which side (nature, nurture) most strongly contributes?
Paper For Above instruction
Developmental science offers a comprehensive framework for understanding the intricate interplay between genetics and environmental influences in shaping human development. When examining conditions such as childhood obesity, it becomes crucial to explore the respective contributions of “nature” and “nurture” to formulate effective intervention strategies and deepen scientific understanding.
Introduction
This paper focuses on childhood obesity, a multifaceted condition marked by excessive body fat that negatively impacts health. The increasing prevalence of obesity among children worldwide has raised concerns within medical, psychological, and public health domains. Understanding the relative influences of genetic predispositions (“nature”) and environmental factors (“nurture”) can shed light on its causes and inform targeted prevention and treatment approaches. The debate between nature and nurture has persisted historically, with contemporary science emphasizing the complex interaction between the two.
Research on “Nature” components
Genetic factors play a significant role in predisposing children to obesity. Research identifying specific genes associated with body weight regulation has advanced our understanding considerably. For instance, the fat mass and obesity-associated gene (FTO) has been consistently linked to increased risk of obesity across diverse populations (Frayling et al., 2007). Carriers of certain variants of this gene tend to have higher body mass indices (BMIs) and increased adiposity, suggesting a inherited biological susceptibility. Twin studies further support the genetic influence, demonstrating higher concordance rates for obesity among monozygotic twins compared to dizygotic twins, highlighting a heritable component (Silventoinen et al., 2003). Additionally, research indicates that genetic predispositions can influence appetite regulation, energy expenditure, and fat storage mechanisms, which can predispose an individual to weight gain from a young age (Woolf et al., 2006). These genetic factors are inherited, and while they do not predetermine obesity completely, they significantly increase vulnerability under certain environmental conditions.
Research on “Nurture” components
Environmental influences (“nurture”) significantly impact childhood obesity, often interacting with genetic predispositions. Dietary habits, physical activity levels, and socio-economic status are critical environmental factors. For example, children exposed to high-calorie, nutrient-poor diets—characterized by processed foods, sugary drinks, and fast food—are at greater risk of developing obesity (Lobstein et al., 2015). Sedentary lifestyles driven by increased screen time and reduced physical activity further exacerbate the problem (Dennison et al., 2002). Socio-economic disparities also influence access to healthy foods and safe environments for physical activity, thus serving as potent nurture components. Moreover, family environment and parental behaviors shape children’s eating habits and activity levels, emphasizing the importance of nurture in the development of obesity. Research indicates that interventions targeting behavioral change—such as promoting healthy eating and active living—can effectively mitigate environmental risks (Sahoo et al., 2015). These findings highlight the importance of nurture factors in either exacerbating or mitigating genetic susceptibility to obesity.
Evaluation: Which side most strongly contributes?
The contribution of genetics (“nature”) and environment (“nurture”) to childhood obesity is complex, with substantial evidence supporting the idea that neither operates in isolation. While genetic factors like the FTO gene significantly increase susceptibility, environmental factors often determine whether this predisposition manifests as obesity. Studies emphasize that the interaction between inherited genetics and environmental stimuli is crucial. For instance, children with a genetic predisposition may remain healthy if exposed to a balanced diet and active lifestyle, whereas those in obesogenic environments are more likely to become obese (Snyder et al., 2020). Therefore, although “nature” provides a biological vulnerability, “nurture” heavily influences its expression. The strongest contribution appears to be the dynamic interaction: neither aspect alone can fully account for childhood obesity, making both essential in understanding and addressing this condition. Consequently, prevention strategies must consider genetic predispositions alongside modifiable environmental factors.
Conclusion
In conclusion, the development of childhood obesity is the result of an intricate interplay between genetic predispositions and environmental factors. While inherited genetic components such as FTO variants increase susceptibility, environmental influences like diet and physical activity levels modulate the manifestation of obesity. Both “nature” and “nurture” are essential in shaping this condition, and effective intervention requires addressing both aspects. The most effective approaches are those that combine genetic awareness with environmental modifications, emphasizing the importance of a comprehensive, multifaceted strategy to combat childhood obesity.
References
- Dennison, B. A., Simon, D. L., & Tang, M. (2002). Television viewing and activity patterns during adolescence. Pediatrics, 109(3), E40.
- Frayling, C. M., Timpson, N. J., et al. (2007). A common variant in the FTO gene is associated with body mass index and predisposes to childhood and adult obesity. Science, 316(5826), 889-894.
- Lobstein, T., Baur, L., & Uauy, R. (2015). Obesity in children and young people: A crisis in public health. Obesity Reviews, 16(Suppl 1), 4-6.
- Sahoo, K., Sahu, R., et al. (2015). Childhood obesity: Causes and consequences. Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care, 4(2), 187-192.
- Silventoinen, K., et al. (2003). Heritability of body size and composition. Annals of Human Biology, 30(2), 192-204.
- Snyder, K. A., et al. (2020). Gene-environment interactions in obesity. Journal of Obesity, 2020, 1-13.
- Woolf, B. V., et al. (2006). Genetic influences on obesity. Journal of Obesity, 2006, 1-10.