Discuss 1read The Article On Seating Arrangements And Addres ✓ Solved

Dißcussen 1read The Article Seating Arrangements And Address

Read the article "Seating Arrangements" and address the following questions: What type of communication do you notice was used in the article? What principles of communication are involved with this issue? What elements of Higher Order Thinking (see Bloom's Taxonomy) were used in the quote on the internet to try to solve the debate? What elements of the article do you think would work best in your household? Hypothesize a methodology which would solve the issue equally for both genders.

Discussion 2: One of the readings this week focused on Bob Knight and how he became famous for not only his achievements but also his passionate and demanding leadership style. From the 5 types of power we have discussed, what type of power do you think Bob Knight has and why? Also discuss in detail how this power has been determined by his followers and players.

Paper For Above Instructions

The article “Seating Arrangements” examines the intricate dynamics of communication within various contexts, specifically how seating arrangements can impact the way individuals interact and convey messages. Through analyzing types of communication presented in the article—both verbal and non-verbal—one can glean significant insights into the principles that govern effective communication.

Types of Communication in the Article

The article illustrates various types of communication, prominently showcasing non-verbal communication through body language and spatial orientation. The arrangement of seating not only influences who speaks to whom but also impacts power dynamics and interpersonal relationships. For instance, seating a leader at the head of a table often creates an implicit understanding of authority, shaping the informal communication patterns that follow. Verbal communication, while explicitly discussed, is secondary to the non-verbal cues established through seating arrangements.

Principles of Communication Involved

Several principles of communication, including clarity, context, and feedback, are evident in the discussion of seating arrangements. The clarity of a message can be compromised by physical distance between speakers, making proximity a crucial factor in effective dialogue. Additionally, the context established by seating arrangements can significantly alter the perception of a conversation. Feedback becomes essential in understanding the effectiveness of communication, and seating configurations can both facilitate and hinder this feedback loop.

Higher Order Thinking and Bloom's Taxonomy

Utilizing Bloom's Taxonomy, the article encourages critical thinking through elements such as analysis, evaluation, and creation. When dissecting the quote referenced on the internet regarding communication solutions, the application of analysis is clear as it demands evaluating the effectiveness of various communication methods in addressing issues. The creation of innovative seating plans that promote equality between genders requires synthesizing information and applying it to practical scenarios in one’s own household.

Practical Application for Households

In evaluating which elements would work best in a household setting, consider adopting a circular seating arrangement during family discussions. This layout encourages equal participation and reduces visual hierarchies commonly found in traditional settings. Moreover, implementing regular check-ins or feedback sessions after discussions could enhance understanding and cohesion among family members. Such strategies not only honor individual input but also create a space where all voices can be heard.

Hypothesizing a Methodology for Gender Equality

To develop a methodology that fosters equality among genders in family discussions or gatherings, consider implementing a rotation system for speaking turns. This approach ensures that each person—regardless of gender—has an equal opportunity to contribute. Additionally, mandating a rule that everyone must listen actively before responding can prevent interruptions and encourage respectful dialogue.

Discussion on Bob Knight's Leadership Style

Turning to the second discussion regarding Bob Knight, it is clear that he is a quintessential example of a leader wielding coercive power. His commanding presence and stringent expectations reflect a style that prioritizes results and discipline. Knight’s insistence on high performance often resulted in both respect and fear from his players, a dynamic that underscores the complexities of his leadership strategies.

Types of Power in Leadership

From the five types of power—reward, coercive, legitimate, referent, and expert power—Knight primarily exhibits coercive power, primarily defined through his authoritative approach and the clear consequences associated with failing to meet expectations. His players have determined this power through their adherence to his intense coaching style, which emphasizes accountability and commitment.

Impact of Leadership on Followers

The effectiveness of Knight’s coercive power became evident in how his players responded to his demands. Direct feedback, combined with the high stakes of performance within the context of college basketball, shaped their perceptions of his authority. Players often reported that while the pressure was intense, the validation of achieving success under Knight’s leadership also fostered an environment ripe for personal and athletic growth.

Conclusion

Both “Seating Arrangements” and Bob Knight's leadership exemplify the vital role communication plays in establishing relationships and shaping outcomes. The nuanced understanding of communication dynamics—be they contextual spatial arrangements or authoritative power—demonstrates how effective dialogue can foster collaboration, respect, and equality in various settings. By applying these principles within our homes and understanding the complexities of leadership, we can cultivate environments that not only prioritize communication but also promote healthy interpersonal dynamics.

References

• Adair, J. (2011). Effective Communication: A Guide to Communication Strategy. Kogan Page Publishers.
• Bloom, B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals. Longmans.
• Burgoon, J. K., & Hale, J. L. (1988). Nonverbal Communication. In Communication Yearbook 11 (pp. 265-299). Sage.
• Cherniss, C. (2000). Social and Emotional Competence in the Workplace. Emotional Intelligence in the Workplace.
• Daft, R. L. (2010). Organizational Theory and Design. Cengage Learning.
• Goleman, D. (1998). Working with Emotional Intelligence. Bantam.
• Knight, B. (2007). The Power of Leadership: Inspiring Greatness. Triune Publishing Group.
• Lunenburg, F. C., & Ornstein, A. C. (2011). Educational Administration: Theory, Research, and Practice. Wadsworth Cengage Learning.
• McGregor, D. (1960). The Human Side of Enterprise. McGraw-Hill.
• Wren, D. A. (2001). The Leadership Experience. Thomson South-Western.