Discuss The Early History Of The Criminal Theory

Discuss About The Early History Of The Criminal Theory And Its Applica

Discuss about the early history of the criminal theory and its application to crime control, specifically contrasting the Positivist School and the Classical School. Additionally, explore how gender, class, and race influence perceptions and enforcement of crime. Evaluate whether racial profiling can be justified at any point, considering its effectiveness and ethical implications. If deemed unjustifiable, analyze whether events like 9/11 provide a justification for ethnic profiling and under what conditions it might be considered effective or acceptable.

Paper For Above instruction

The early history of criminal theory has significantly shaped contemporary approaches to crime control, particularly through the contrasting paradigms of the Classical and Positivist Schools. The Classical School, emerging in the 18th century, was revolutionary in emphasizing rationality, free will, and the importance of proportionate punishment. Philosophers like Cesare Beccaria argued that individuals commit crimes based on rational calculation and that the justice system should promote deterrence through fair, swift, and certain punishments (Beccaria, 1764). This school advocated for a balance between individual rights and state authority, emphasizing that laws should be clear and consistent to prevent arbitrariness.

In opposition, the Positivist School arose in the 19th century, emphasizing scientific methods to understand criminal behavior. Influenced by developments in biology, psychology, and sociology, positivists believed that criminality was rooted in factors beyond individual control, such as genetic predispositions, mental illness, or social environment. Cesare Lombroso, often regarded as the father of criminology, suggested that criminal tendencies could be identified through biological traits, which shifted the focus toward rehabilitation rather than punishment alone (Lombroso, 1876). This perspective aligns with modern criminal justice efforts to address social inequalities and psychological factors that contribute to criminal behavior.

Relating these theories to issues of gender, class, and race reveals systemic biases in crime perceptions and enforcement. Historically, marginalized groups—such as racial minorities, the poor, and women—have been disproportionately targeted or stereotyped based on societal prejudices. For example, racial profiling often stems from stereotypical assumptions that associate race with criminality, disregarding individual behavior (Walker, 2014). Such biases reinforce social inequalities and undermine justice.

The justification of racial profiling remains highly contentious. Some argue that in specific contexts, like heightened security threats post-9/11, ethnic profiling might be justified as a temporary, targeted measure if it significantly enhances detection efficacy without infringing on civil rights. However, empirical evidence suggests that racial profiling is largely ineffective and unjust because it undermines trust in law enforcement and violates constitutional rights (Fryer & Torelli, 2010). For profiling to be justified, it must demonstrate high accuracy and minimal harm to civil liberties; otherwise, it risks perpetuating discrimination.

Following the events of September 11, 2001, some claim that increased surveillance and ethnic profiling were necessary for national security. While heightened vigilance is understandable, relying on racial or ethnic profiling as a primary tactic risks scapegoating entire communities and violating constitutional principles of equality and justice. Effective security measures should instead focus on specific, evidence-based threat assessments rather than broad stereotypes, ensuring both safety and civil rights are protected (DeGenova, 2002).

In conclusion, early criminal theories have evolved to recognize complex social, biological, and psychological influences on behavior, emphasizing the importance of fairness and accuracy in law enforcement. The use of racial profiling remains ethically dubious and largely ineffective unless it achieves an extraordinarily high level of precision—something current evidence does not support. Post-9/11 security policies should prioritize intelligence-driven, non-discriminatory practices to uphold justice while safeguarding national security.

References

• Beccaria, C. (1764). On Crimes and Punishments. Translated by Henry Paolucci. Indiano Publishing.
• Lombroso, C. (1876). The Criminal Woman. William Heinemann.
• DeGenova, N. (2002). The Legal Reality of “Race,” “Crime,” and Immigration: Bordering and the Framing of “Illegal” Immigration. Social & Legal Studies, 11(2), 179–202.
• Fryer, R. G., & Torelli, P. (2010). An Empirical Assessment of Racial Differences in Police Use of Force. American Economic Review, 100(1), 192–213.
• Walker, S. (2014). The Color of Justice: Race, Crime, and Punishment. Yale University Press.