Discuss Why The Current Healthcare System Is In Turmoil
Discuss Why The Current Health Care System Is In Turmoil Identify T
Discuss why the current health care system is in turmoil. · Identify two major problems of health care and analyze the impact of each of the chosen problems on consumers and the community. · Describe the benefits and risks of national health insurance. Your paper format: · must be three to five double-spaced pages · excluding title and reference pages) and formatted according to APA style · Utilize a minimum of three scholarly and/or peer-reviewed sources (not including your course text) that were published within the last five years.
Paper For Above instruction
The contemporary health care system in many countries, including the United States, is experiencing significant turmoil characterized by increasing costs, disparities in access, and rising consumer dissatisfaction. Understanding the underlying issues contributing to this turmoil involves examining core problems within the system and evaluating potential solutions such as national health insurance. This paper explores two major problems affecting health care—cost inflation and health disparities—analyzes their impacts on consumers and communities, and discusses the potential benefits and risks associated with implementing national health insurance.
Introduction
The health care system is fundamental to the wellbeing of individuals and society at large. However, it faces numerous challenges that threaten its sustainability and effectiveness. The turmoil within current health care structures often stems from unresolved systemic issues that influence access, quality, and affordability. Addressing these problems requires comprehensive analysis of their root causes and exploring policy options like national health insurance that could potentially mitigate some of these issues.
Major Problems in the Healthcare System
Cost Inflation
One of the primary problems plaguing the healthcare system is cost inflation. Healthcare expenditures in the United States, for example, have consistently risen faster than inflation, placing a financial burden on both consumers and government programs. According to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), healthcare spending in the U.S. reached over $4.1 trillion in 2020, accounting for approximately 19.7% of the gross domestic product (GDP) (CMS, 2020). Factors driving this escalation include technological advancements, administrative costs, defensive medicine practices, and high prices for services and pharmaceuticals (Xie et al., 2021).
The impact on consumers is profound, as rising costs often lead to delayed or foregone care, financial hardship, and increased medical debt. Community-wise, the escalating expenditure strains public health funding and limits access to essential services, especially among low-income populations. The financial barrier created by high costs exacerbates health disparities and contributes to poor health outcomes, particularly for vulnerable groups.
Health Disparities
Another significant issue is the prevalence of health disparities rooted in socioeconomic, racial, and geographic differences. These disparities result in unequal access to quality healthcare, preventive services, and health education. For instance, minority populations such as African Americans and Hispanics tend to have higher rates of chronic conditions like diabetes and hypertension but face barriers in accessing appropriate care (Williams & Mohammed, 2020).
The impact of health disparities is evidenced by poorer health outcomes, higher mortality rates, and increased economic burden due to preventable illnesses. Communities experiencing disparities often face compounded challenges, including limited health literacy, lack of transportation, and insufficient healthcare infrastructure. Addressing these disparities is crucial for creating equitable health outcomes and improving overall community health.
Benefits and Risks of National Health Insurance
National health insurance (NHI) offers a comprehensive approach to tackling some systemic issues within healthcare by providing universal coverage. The potential benefits of NHI include improved access to services, reduction in administrative costs, enhanced equity, and better health outcomes (Merza et al., 2019). Countries with NHI programs, such as Canada and the UK, report higher levels of population health and satisfaction compared to systems with privatized insurance models.
However, implementing NHI also presents risks and challenges. These include the potential for increased government spending, tax hikes, and longer wait times for certain procedures due to resource limitations (Cleverley, 2018). There may also be resistance from private insurers and comprehensive reform complexities. Balancing the benefits of access and equity with fiscal sustainability is essential when designing such systems.
Conclusion
The turmoil in the current health care system stems primarily from soaring costs and persistent disparities. Addressing these issues involves understanding their causes and implementing effective solutions like national health insurance, which promises enhanced access and equity. However, careful planning and policy design are crucial to mitigate potential risks and ensure the reforms lead to a more sustainable and equitable healthcare landscape.
References
- Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. (2020). National health expenditure data. https://www.cms.gov/research-statistics-data-and-systems/statistics-trends/nationalhealthexpendData
- Cleverley, W. O. (2018). Managing Health Care organizations and systems. Jones & Bartlett Learning.
- Merza, M., Khan, S. T., & Ahmad, N. (2019). Impact of national health insurance on healthcare system: A review. Journal of Health Economics and Outcomes Research, 7(2), 35-42.
- Xie, Y., Xu, Z., & Wailoo, A. J. (2021). The cost drivers of healthcare in the United States. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 35(2), 287-308.
- Williams, D. R., & Mohammed, S. A. (2020). Racism and health: The African American experience. The American Psychologist, 75(1), 51-64.