Discussion 1: Alternative Model Of Personality Disorders

Discussion 1 Alternative Model Of Personality Disordersthe

Evaluate the new alternative model for personality disorders introduced in DSM-5 and analyze its impact on diagnosing Cathy, a client previously diagnosed under DSM-IV criteria. Update her diagnosis to DSM-5 and ICD-10-CM standards, considering how the inclusion of the alternative model influences her clinical profile. Examine which behaviors and symptoms may reflect her enduring personality traits versus which meet the diagnostic criteria. Discuss how "Other Conditions That May Be a Focus of Clinical Attention" could influence her overall diagnosis and treatment planning.

Paper For Above instruction

Personality disorders have long posed challenges for clinicians due to their complex presentation and the limitations inherent in categorical diagnostic models. The DSM-5 introduced an alternative, dimensional approach for diagnosing personality disorders, which seeks to capture the nuances and variability in personality pathology more effectively than the DSM-IV categorical system. Updating Cathy’s diagnosis within these frameworks requires a detailed understanding of her behaviors, symptomatology, and personality traits, integrating both models and recognizing the clinical utility of the dimensional approach.

Under DSM-IV, Cathy’s diagnosis might have been categorized under a specific personality disorder, such as borderline or antisocial personality disorder, based on her behaviors observed at the time. However, DSM-5's new hybrid model divides personality disorders into two components: Criterion A (Level of Personality Functioning) and Criterion B (Pathological Personality Traits). Applying these to Cathy involves assessing her level of self and interpersonal functioning and mapping her traits onto domain-specific maladaptive traits, such as Negative Affectivity, Disinhibition, or Detachment (American Psychiatric Association, 2013, pp. 760–761).

Transitioning to DSM-5, Cathy’s diagnosis might now focus on her personality functioning level and trait profile. For example, if Cathy exhibits unstable self-image, impulsivity, emotional dysregulation, and intense interpersonal conflicts, she might score high on Negative Affectivity, Borderliness, and Disinhibition domains. Her diagnosis can be articulated as “Personality Disorder Trait Specified (PDTS), with prominent features of borderline personality traits.” This reflects her enduring personality features while allowing flexibility and acknowledging the spectrum of her traits.

In ICD-10-CM, Cathy’s features could be coded as F60.3 (emotionally unstable personality disorder, borderline type) or other relevant codes based on her specific traits. The ICD-10-CM primarily aligns with the categorical model but also recognizes traits and dimensions, although less explicitly than DSM-5.

One of the primary impacts of the alternative model on Cathy’s diagnosis is its recognition that personality traits exist on spectrums rather than discrete categories. This enhances clinical understanding and emphasizes the severity and pervasiveness of her traits, providing a richer, more nuanced diagnosis. It also facilitates personalized treatment plans targeting her specific traits and level of functioning, rather than a broad categorical label.

Distinguishing behaviors that are personality traits from those that meet criteria for disorder is crucial. Traits such as mood variability, interpersonal sensitivity, or impulsivity may be enduring features of her personality structure. In contrast, her clinical diagnosis requires symptoms that cause significant distress or impairment—such as chronic feelings of emptiness or profound interpersonal turmoil—per DSM and ICD criteria. Traits by themselves may not meet the threshold for diagnosis but are critical for understanding her predispositions and potential vulnerabilities.

The "Other Conditions That May Be a Focus of Clinical Attention" (American Psychiatric Association, 2013, pp. 761–762) might include Cathy’s substance use, recent trauma, or social stressors impacting her functioning. These conditions may not constitute a diagnosis but are essential for comprehensive care. For example, if Cathy is struggling with substance abuse, this may complicate her personality pathology and require integrated treatment approaches.

Overall, the inclusion of the alternative model transforms the diagnostic paradigm from a categorical to a dimensional, trait-based system. It offers a more precise, individualized understanding of clients like Cathy, fostering better-targeted interventions and improving outcomes. The model promotes a view of personality pathology as a continuum, recognizing the fluidity and complexity of human personalities in clinical practice.

References

• American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Publishing.
• Widiger, T. A., & Simonsen, E. (2005). Alternative dimensional models of personality disorder: Finding a common ground. Personality Disorders, 19(2), 110–130.
• Gunderson, J. (2008). Borderline personality disorder. Social Work in Mental Health, 6(1), 5–12.
• Verheul, R. (2005). Clinical utility of dimensional models for personality pathology. Personality Disorders, 19, 283–302.
• Gerrard, J. (2018). Personality pathology assessment. In M. R. M. Bushnell (Ed.), Personality disorders in clinical practice (pp. 45–70). Elsevier.
• Clarkin, J., Yeomans, F., & Selby, P. (2014). Personality disorder diagnosis and dimensional models. American Journal of Psychiatry, 171(2), 165–176.
• Patrick, C. J., & Morgan, J. F. (2009). Dimensional diagnosis of personality disorder: A promising alternative. Current Psychiatry Reports, 11(3), 229–236.
• Skodol, A. E., & Bender, D. (2009). Dimensional models of personality disorder. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 43(6), 526–533.
• Bender, D. S., et al. (2011). Personality traits and disorders: Are they distinct? Journal of Personality, 79(4), 773–797.
• Hopwood, C. J., & Morey, L. C. (2013). Personality assessment and diagnosis. In M. H. Bornstein (Ed.), Handbook of clinical psychology (pp. 421–446). Elsevier.