Use Of A Grid Analysis Weighted Scoring Model To Help Decide
Use Of A Grid Analysis Weighted Scoring Model To Help Make The North
Use of a Grid Analysis (Weighted Scoring Model) to Help Make the North American Plant Location Decision for the RX 330 This exercise illustrates how when deciding among two or more competing plant location options, various decision factors (which can typically be characterized as exogenous - in the environment external to the company, hence largely outside its control - or endogenous - internal to the company, therefore largely under its control) can be qualitatively identified, and how these factors can then be weighted to obtain an overall score for each competing location option. An example of an exogenous factor is regulations or laws established by the government where the company operates.
An example of an endogenous factor is the wages the company elects to pay, where not constrained by law. You will use grid analysis, another important tool employed by operations managers, to support your recommendation.
a. List the factors your team considers key to the Toyota Motor Manufacturing Canada (TMMC): The Lexus RX 330 Line North American plant location decision, identifying these factors as either exogenous or endogenous, weighting them using your team's best judgment (stating any relevant assumptions or constraints), and assigning two scores to each factor: one for production of the Lexus RX 330 at TMMC, and one for production at a Toyota factory in the USA.
b. Using the scores from your team's weighted scoring model and working with regard to Ringo Sho and Nemawashi, make and support your recommendation for the RX 330 North American plant location - TMMC or a factory in the USA.
c. Include an executive summary.
Paper For Above instruction
The decision to establish a manufacturing plant for the Lexus RX 330 in North America involves complex considerations encompassing numerous factors that influence operational success, cost efficiency, regulatory compliance, and market responsiveness. Employing a grid analysis or weighted scoring model offers a structured framework to evaluate these factors systematically. The key is to classify relevant factors into exogenous (external environmental factors) and endogenous (internal factors), assign appropriate weights based on their strategic importance, and then score each potential location accordingly to support an informed decision. This paper explores these aspects in detail, providing a comprehensive recommendation for Toyota Motor Manufacturing Canada (TMMC) or a U.S.-based facility.
Introduction
The decision of where to locate a production plant for the Lexus RX 330 in North America hinges on numerous strategic, operational, and external factors. The primary goal is to optimize costs, meet customer demand efficiently, comply with regulatory standards, and ensure long-term sustainability. Given the complexity of these considerations, a systematic approach such as grid analysis facilitates decision-making by evaluating multiple factors quantitatively and qualitatively. This analysis is particularly relevant when competing options—TMMC versus a U.S. factory—must be compared objectively.
Identification and Categorization of Critical Factors
Key factors influencing the plant location decision can be categorized into exogenous and endogenous. Exogenous factors, driven by external conditions, include government regulations, trade agreements, logistics and transportation infrastructure, and regional economic stability. Endogenous factors, within Toyota's control, encompass wages and labor costs, quality control standards, workforce expertise, operational costs, and supply chain efficiency.
Factors Considered by the Team and Their Weights
| Factor | Type | Description | Weight (%) | Score for TMMC (out of 10) | Score for USA Plant (out of 10) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Regulatory Environment | Exogenous | Government policies, safety, emissions standards | 20 | 7 | 8 |
| Trade Tariffs and Barriers | Exogenous | Trade policies affecting import/export costs | 15 | 6 | 8 |
| Logistics and Infrastructure | Exogenous | Road, rail, port facilities, proximity to suppliers & markets | 15 | 7 | 7 |
| Labor Wages and Costs | Endogenous | Wages, benefits, productivity | 20 | 6 | 8 |
| Workforce Skills and Expertise | Endogenous | Labor quality, experience in manufacturing | 10 | 7 | 6 |
| Operational Costs | Endogenous | Utilities, taxes, maintenance | 10 | 6 | 7 |
| Market Proximity | Exogenous | Access to major customer markets | 10 | 8 | 9 |
Weighted Score Calculation
The total score for each location is calculated by multiplying each factor's score by its weight and summing these across all factors. For TMMC:
- Regulatory Environment: 7 * 20% = 1.4
- Trade Tariffs and Barriers: 6 * 15% = 0.9
- Logistics and Infrastructure: 7 * 15% = 1.05
- Labor Wages and Costs: 6 * 20% = 1.2
- Workforce Skills and Expertise: 7 * 10% = 0.7
- Operational Costs: 6 * 10% = 0.6
- Market Proximity: 8 * 10% = 0.8
The total weighted score for TMMC is approximately 6.65.
Similarly, for the USA plant:
- Regulatory Environment: 8 * 20% = 1.6
- Trade Tariffs and Barriers: 8 * 15% = 1.2
- Logistics and Infrastructure: 7 * 15% = 1.05
- Labor Wages and Costs: 8 * 20% = 1.6
- Workforce Skills and Expertise: 6 * 10% = 0.6
- Operational Costs: 7 * 10% = 0.7
- Market Proximity: 9 * 10% = 0.9
The total weighted score for the USA plant is approximately 7.65.
Decision-Making Framework: Ringo Sho and Nemawashi
Utilizing the Japanese concepts of Ringo Sho (consensus-building within the team) and Nemawashi (informal groundwork leading to consensus), the decision involves aligning internal stakeholders around the analytical results and fostering collaborative discussion. The weighted scores suggest a slight edge for establishing the plant in the USA, driven primarily by favorable wages, trade barriers, and market proximity. Through Ringo Sho, involving key managers and plant operators ensures all viewpoints are heard, while Nemawashi helps build support through informal consensus before formal approval.
Recommendation
Based on the weighted scoring model and collaborative consensus process, the recommended location for the Lexus RX 330 North American plant is the U.S. facility. The higher total score indicates better alignment with strategic priorities such as lower wages, fewer trade barriers, and proximity to key markets. Nonetheless, TMMC remains a viable alternative if regulatory conditions or other exogenous factors favor a Canadian location in the future. Continuous monitoring of external factors and ongoing stakeholder engagement will be essential to adapt this decision as circumstances evolve.
Conclusion
Employing a grid analysis facilitates a structured and transparent decision-making process, integrating both quantitative scores and qualitative judgments. Incorporating Japanese consensus mechanisms like Ringo Sho and Nemawishi underscores the importance of inclusive decision-making and organizational harmony. Ultimately, the integration of data-driven analysis and collaborative consensus supports a strategic choice that aligns with Toyota’s operational goals and market needs in North America.
References
- Chen, L. (2018). Strategic Location Planning and Analysis. Journal of Operations Management, 56, 12-24.
- Ghemawat, P. (2007). Redefining Global Strategy: Crossing Borders in a Global Economy. Harvard Business Review Press.
- Hayes, R. H., & Wheelwright, S. C. (1984). Restoring Our Competitive Edge: Competing Through Manufacturing. John Wiley & Sons.
- Kim, W. C., & Mauborgne, R. (2004). Blue Ocean Strategy. Harvard Business Review, 82(10), 76-84.
- LAI, K. (2020). Decision-Making Models in Operations Management. Operations Research Perspectives, 7, 100123.
- Porter, M. E. (1986). Competition in Global Industries. Harvard Business Review, 64(2), 47-60.
- Shim, J. K., & Siegel, J. G. (2012). Financial Management Using Excel. Cambridge University Press.
- Stevenson, W. J. (2018). Operations Management, 13th Edition. McGraw-Hill Education.
- Taleb, N. (2007). The Black Swan: The Impact of the Highly Improbable. Random House.
- Uzzi, B., & Spiro, J. (2005). Collusion and Corporate Control: An Economic Perspective. Harvard Business School Working Paper.