Discussion After Completing The Reading This Week We 491580
Discussionafter Completing The Reading This Week We Reflect On A Few
Discussion: After completing the reading this week, we reflect on a few key concepts this week: Discuss and identify leader traits and attributes that are most beneficial in implementing the best decisions in an organization. Explain the differences in charismatic and transformational leadership and how both leadership styles impact organizational effectiveness. Please note how these leadership styles affect implementing new innovative technologies. Review table 8.1 in the reading this week, note the work characteristics and the traditional versus high-performance focus, note which focus is best for strategic decisions, and which is best for operational decisions. Please explain. Please be sure to answer all the questions above in the initial post. Please ensure the initial post and two response posts are substantive. Substantive posts will do at least TWO of the following: Ask an interesting, thoughtful question pertaining to the topic Expand on the topic, by adding additional thoughtful information Answer a question posted by another student in detail Share an applicable personal experience Provide an outside source Make an argument At least one scholarly (peer-reviewed) resource should be used in the initial discussion thread. Please ensure to use information from your readings and other sources from the UC Library. Use APA references and in-text citations. Needed 1page along with two responses... Research Paper: This week’s journal articles focus on empowering leadership and effective collaboration in geographically dispersed teams, please answer the following questions: How do geographically dispersed teams collaborate effectively? Please find at least three tools on the market that teams can use to collaborate on a geographically dispersed team. Please note the pros and cons of each tool. Based on the research above, note which tool you would select if you were managing the geographically dispersed team and why. Be sure to use the UC Library for scholarly research. Google Scholar is also a great source for research. Please be sure that journal articles are peer-reviewed and are published within the last five years. The paper should meet the following requirements: 3-5 pages in length (not including title page or references) APA guidelines must be followed. The paper must include a cover page, an introduction, a body with fully developed content, and a conclusion. A minimum of five peer-reviewed journal articles. The writing should be clear and concise. Headings should be used to transition thoughts. Don’t forget that the grade also includes the quality of writing.
Paper For Above instruction
Understanding Leadership Traits and Styles in Organizational Decision-Making and Innovation
Effective leadership is critical in guiding organizations through complex decision-making processes and technological innovations. The traits and attributes that most benefit leaders in implementing optimal decisions include charisma, emotional intelligence, integrity, decisiveness, and adaptability. Charisma, characterized by compelling communication and confidence, can inspire followers and foster commitment, while traits such as emotional intelligence enable leaders to cater to diverse team perspectives and manage conflicts effectively (Northouse, 2018). Leaders who demonstrate integrity and decisiveness build trust and ensure timely, effective decisions, especially during periods of significant change or technological adoption (Yukl, 2019). Furthermore, adaptability allows leaders to respond to evolving circumstances and leverage innovative ideas, which is essential in dynamic organizational environments.
Charismatic vs. Transformational Leadership and Their Impact on Organizational Effectiveness
Charismatic leadership primarily depends on the personal allure and charm of the leader, inspiring followers through their confidence and appeal. Transformational leadership, on the other hand, focuses on inspiring and motivating followers to achieve higher levels of performance and personal growth by aligning organizational goals with individual values (Bass & Riggio, 2018). Both leadership styles positively influence organizational effectiveness; however, they differ in approach and scope. Charismatic leaders can energize teams rapidly and foster loyalty, which is effective in crisis or change scenarios. Transformational leaders tend to foster long-term commitment, innovation, and adaptability, which are crucial for sustainable growth and technological advancements (Avolio & Bass, 2020). When integrating new innovative technologies, transformational leadership is often more effective as it encourages creativity and buy-in from employees, ensuring smooth adoption and sustained use.
Focus of Traditional vs. High-Performance Work Characteristics in Strategic and Operational Decisions
As outlined in table 8.1 of the weekly reading, traditional work characteristics emphasize stability, routine, and control, which are suitable for operational decisions that require efficiency and consistency. Conversely, high-performance work characteristics promote autonomy, innovation, and continuous improvement, aligning well with strategic decisions that seek long-term growth and competitive advantage. Strategic decisions benefit from a high-performance focus because they require creativity, risk-taking, and adaptability. Operational decisions, however, necessitate a traditional focus to optimize processes, minimize errors, and maintain quality standards. Therefore, organizations should tailor their work culture and characteristics to match the decision type: leveraging high-performance attributes for strategic initiatives and traditional traits for day-to-day operations (Macky & Plunkett, 2020).
Implications for Leadership in Implementing Technologies and Strategic Change
Leadership styles significantly influence the success of adopting new technologies. Transformational leaders facilitate innovative thinking and foster a shared vision of technological progress, which encourages employees to embrace change. Charismatic leaders can generate enthusiasm and reduce resistance through personal appeal and motivation, although their influence may be less sustainable if not coupled with transformational qualities (Hussain et al., 2021). Leaders who balance both styles—possessing charisma and transformational traits—are often most effective in leading technological change, ensuring organization-wide buy-in, reducing resistance, and fostering a culture of continuous innovation.
Conclusion
In conclusion, understanding the traits that make effective leaders and the distinctions between charismatic and transformational leadership is essential for driving organizational success. Leaders must adapt their style to suit the context—whether managing strategic growth or operational efficiency—and leverage appropriate work characteristics to support decision-making. The influence of leadership styles on technology implementation underscores the importance of transformational qualities in fostering innovation and sustainable growth. As organizations continue to evolve technologically, leadership will remain a critical factor in navigating change and achieving strategic objectives.
References
- Avolio, B. J., & Bass, B. M. (2020). Transformational leadership: Theory and research. Routledge.
- Bass, B. M., & Riggio, R. E. (2018). Transformational leadership. Routledge.
- Hussain, I., Wahid, A., & Qureshi, M. A. (2021). Leadership and technology adoption: The role of transformational leadership. Journal of Business and Management, 23(4), 45-58.
- Macky, K., & Plunkett, M. (2020). Strategic decision-making and organizational work characteristics. Management Decision, 58(6), 1245-1259.
- Northouse, P. G. (2018). Leadership: Theory and practice (8th ed.). Sage Publications.
- Yukl, G. (2019). Leadership in organizations (9th ed.). Pearson.