Discussion Board Grading Rubric Student Criteria Poin 157417

Discussion Board Grading Rubricstudentcriteriapointspossiblepoints Ea

Based on comments from your instructor and peers in Week 4, edit and refine any sections of the final research plan. Add a section of 300–500 words about how you interpreted the data from your survey or questionnaire in Week 3. Add this section at the end of your research project. Complete the final full Key Assignment of your final research proposal. The required sections include the following: the business and organizational problem or topic, the problem statement, the research strategy used to explore the problem, one research question or hypothesis, rationale for the research strategy, one research instrument, a copy of the questionnaire or survey, a section on ethical considerations, your sample population, data analysis summary, measurement strategy, and research results.

Paper For Above instruction

The final research project requires comprehensive detailing of the business or organizational problem and a well-structured research strategy, including a clearly defined problem statement, research question or hypothesis, and an explanation of why the chosen research method is appropriate. The proposal must incorporate a specific research instrument, such as a questionnaire or survey, and include the actual instrument as an appendix or attachment. Ethical considerations are crucial; these should address participant confidentiality, informed consent, and the mitigation of potential harm. The sample population should be described clearly, including demographics and selection criteria. A data analysis summary must outline how data will be processed, analyzed, and interpreted to answer the research question. Measurement strategies should specify variables, scales, and tools used to collect and assess data, ensuring reliability and validity. The research results section should anticipate potential outcomes and implications based on different scenarios. Additionally, after receiving feedback from the instructor and peers, incorporate a 300–500-word reflection at the end of the project that discusses the interpretation of survey or questionnaire data, highlighting key insights gained and how these inform conclusions.

Analysis and Synthesis of Research Strategy

The research strategy outlined combines qualitative and quantitative methods, a mixed-method approach suited for sensitive topics like sexual harassment in the workplace. This blended methodology allows for a comprehensive understanding of the issue, capturing both statistical prevalence and personal experiences. The qualitative aspect involves interviews or open-ended questionnaire responses, providing rich detail on the causes, perceptions, and remedies for sexual harassment. The quantitative part enables the collection of measurable data, such as the frequency of incidents, the demographic distribution of victims and perpetrators, and the effectiveness of organizational policies. This approach aligns with best practices in social research, especially in organizational studies where complex human behaviors and organizational cultures intersect (Creswell, 2014). The sampling plan involves selecting employees from various departments to ensure diversity and representativeness, with an emphasis on female employees who are more typically affected (Fitzgerald et al., 1997). The ethical considerations emphasize confidentiality, voluntary participation, and sensitive handling of the data, essential for maintaining trust and integrity in research involving potentially vulnerable populations (Israel & Hay, 2006). Data analysis will involve thematic coding for qualitative responses and statistical analysis for quantitative data, allowing for triangulation and validation of findings (Patton, 2002). Measurement strategies include categorizing the severity of harassment, assessing organizational response efficacy, and identifying correlational factors. Overall, this research design aims to produce reliable, actionable insights to address workplace sexual harassment comprehensively.

References

• Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. SAGE Publications.
• Fitzgerald, L. F., Gelfand, M., & Drasgow, F. (1997). Measuring sexual harassment: Theoretical and psychometric advances. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 51(1), 124-144.
• Israel, M., & Hay, I. (2006). Research ethics for social scientists. Sage Publications.
• Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Sage Publications.
• Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage Publications.
• Fisher, R. A. (2008). Statistical methods for research workers. Hafner.
• McBurney, D., McBurney, D., & Middleton, P. (2004). Research methods. Brooks/Cole Publishing Co.
• Armstrong, M. (2005). Human Resource Management Practice (9th ed.). British Library Cataloguing in Publication.
• Guest, D. E., & Moore, C. (2009). Organizational behaviour: An introductory approach. Pearson Education.
• Reskin, B. F. (1998). The real discrimination problem: Different treatment or unequal results? Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 353(1373), 1055–1063.