Discussion Board Unit Of Offender Classification Due Date Ju
Typediscussion Boardunitoffender Classificationdue Datesun 9
Type: Discussion Board Unit: Offender Classification Due Date: Sun, 9/7/16 Deliverable Length: 3-5 paragraphs In today’s correctional environment, it is very important to establish a method of correctional treatment. In this assignment, you will address the following scenario: · As a correctional administrator, you are in charge of a boot camp filled with males who were sentenced there as a last resort. The offenders have committed nonviolent crimes and have a minimum of a high school diploma. If you were a correctional administrator, which correctional treatment model would you subscribe to? Explain your answer by giving examples on how the correctional treatment model would improve your facility. Assignment Guidelines: · Address the following in 3–5 paragraphs: · Which of the 2 correctional treatment models would you apply to the above scenario? Why? · Specifically, how would this model improve the facility? · How would the scenario have to change for you to select the alternate model?
Paper For Above instruction
As a correctional administrator overseeing a boot camp composed of nonviolent male offenders with at least a high school diploma, selecting an appropriate correctional treatment model is crucial for enhancing rehabilitation and ensuring the safety and productivity of the facility. The two predominant models in correctional treatment are the rehabilitative model and the reformative model. For this scenario, I would primarily subscribe to the rehabilitative model, as it emphasizes restoring offenders to law-abiding behaviors through education, skill development, and therapeutic interventions. This approach aligns well with the characteristics of the offenders in question, providing them with constructive pathways to reintegration and reducing the likelihood of recidivism.
The rehabilitative model focuses on individualized treatment plans that address the underlying issues contributing to criminal behavior, such as lack of employment skills or substance abuse. Given that the offenders have already demonstrated a commitment to education by possessing a high school diploma, incorporating job training programs, counseling, and life skills workshops in the facility could significantly improve their chances of successful reintegration into society. For instance, offering vocational training or certification programs would equip them with valuable skills, making employment post-release more attainable. Additionally, therapeutic interventions focusing on anger management or substance abuse (if applicable) could address underlying behavioral issues, reducing the risk of reoffending. Implementing such programs would foster a supportive environment conducive to behavioral change, ultimately enhancing the overall effectiveness of the correctional facility.
Furthermore, adopting the rehabilitative model can positively impact the operational dynamics of the facility by promoting a more engaging and goal-oriented environment. Inmates would have clear, constructive objectives to work toward, such as completing educational courses or vocational training, which can improve morale and reduce idleness—a common source of discipline issues in correctional settings. This model also encourages staff to focus on individualized treatment plans, improving interaction quality and fostering a culture of growth and development. Such an environment not only benefits the offenders but also contributes to the safety and security of the facility. For example, structured programs centered around personal development can decrease instances of violence or misconduct, creating a more stable environment for both staff and inmates.
However, the scenario might change for me to consider the reformative model if the offenders demonstrated advanced behavioral issues, such as habitual violent conduct, or if rehabilitation efforts failed to produce measurable behavioral improvements over time. In such cases, a focus on reforming fundamental character traits through a more strict, discipline-centered approach might be warranted. Alternatively, if the facility's primary goal shifted towards punishment rather than rehabilitation, the reformative model could take precedence. Overall, the choice of the correctional treatment model depends on the nature of the offenders' behaviors and the specific goals of the correctional facility, but for the current scenario, the rehabilitative model offers the most promise for effective offender management and societal reintegration.
References
Adams, K., & Ferrandino, L. (2008). Community supervision and treatment. In M. D. Krohn, C. A. Massey, & S. M. Schwartz (Eds.), Correctional approaches and their effects (pp. 152-174). Sage Publications.
Blumstein, A., & Wallman, J. (Eds.). (2006). The crime drop in America. Cambridge University Press.
Cullen, F. T., Jonson, C. L., & Nagin, D. S. (2011). The effectiveness of correctional treatment: A review of the literature. Crime & Justice, 40(1), 97–132.
Gendreau, P., & Andrews, D. A. (1990). Correctional treatment: A review of the literature. Canadian Journal of Criminology, 32(2), 173-204.
Lipsey, M. W. (2009). The primary factors that characterize effective interventions with juvenile offenders: A meta-analytic overview. Victims & Offenders, 4(2), 124-147.
Petersilia, J. (2003). When prisoners come home: Parole and prisoner reentry. Oxford University Press.
Sutherland, E. H. (1947). Principles of criminology. J.B. Lippincott Company.
Wilson, D. B., Bouffard, L. A., & MacKenzie, D. L. (2005). A quantitative review of structured, group-oriented, cognitive-behavioral programs for offenders. Journal of Crime & Justice, 28(1), 121-160.
Wyatt, W. L. (2009). Introduction to criminal justice. Pearson Education.