Discussion Conflict With Teams Part 1: Conflict Within Teams

Discussion Conflict with Teams Part 1: Conflict within Teams Think of a conflict that occurred in a team you were a part of and analyze it. What were the main sources of the conflict? What interventions can be used to improve the quality of conflict in a team? Part 2: Creativity in Teams Evaluate yourself using the three indices of creativity. What strategies can you use to enhance your creativity?

Conflict within teams often arises from communication breakdowns, differing perceptions, and competing interests. In a past team project, the primary source of conflict was miscommunication—team members misunderstood roles and expectations, leading to frustration and disagreements. Additionally, differences in work styles and priorities further fueled the conflict, creating a tense environment that hindered progress. To improve the quality of conflict, various interventions can be employed, such as promoting open communication, encouraging active listening, and fostering a culture of respect and collaboration. Implementing conflict resolution strategies like mediation or negotiation can help address disagreements constructively, turning conflicts into opportunities for growth and innovation.

Regarding creativity, I evaluate myself based on the three indices: fluency, flexibility, and originality. I tend to generate multiple ideas (fluency), often exploring different perspectives (flexibility), but sometimes struggle to develop entirely novel ideas (originality). To enhance my creativity, I can adopt strategies such as diversifying my experiences to gain new insights, practicing brainstorming sessions without self-criticism, and engaging in activities that challenge my conventional ways of thinking, such as arts or puzzles. Additionally, collaborating with diverse individuals can stimulate different viewpoints, fostering innovative thinking. Regular reflection on ideas and seeking feedback can further refine and expand my creative capabilities, ensuring continuous improvement and adaptability in problem-solving and idea generation.

Paper For Above instruction

Conflict within teams is an inevitable aspect of collaborative work, often stemming from differences in communication styles, perceptions, and interests. In my previous team experience, a significant conflict arose when roles and responsibilities were unclear, leading to confusion, duplicated efforts, and frustration among team members. This misunderstanding was primarily caused by a lack of effective communication and insufficient clarification during the project planning phase. The conflict was exacerbated by diverse work priorities and individual approaches to problem-solving, which clashed and created tension. Addressing such conflicts requires interventions focused on enhancing communication clarity and fostering mutual understanding. Strategies like establishing clear roles from the outset, encouraging open dialogue, and implementing conflict resolution techniques such as mediation can transform disagreements into constructive discussions. Cultivating a team environment grounded in respect and collaboration boosts trust and promotes innovative solutions, ultimately enhancing team performance (Jehn & Bendersky, 2003; Tuckman, 1965).

Evaluating myself through the lens of creativity involves considering the three indices: fluency, flexibility, and originality. Fluency refers to the ability to produce numerous ideas. I generally excel in this area, often generating many solutions during brainstorming sessions. Flexibility pertains to the capacity to view problems from different perspectives, which I also practice regularly, especially when working with diverse teams. However, originality—the uniqueness of ideas—poses a greater challenge, as I tend to rely on familiar concepts with less frequency of truly novel solutions. To improve my creativity, I can adopt several strategies. Engaging in diverse activities outside of my comfort zone, such as learning new skills or exploring different disciplines, can stimulate innovative thinking. Additionally, practicing divergent thinking exercises, where I brainstorm freely without judgment, can foster originality. Collaborating with individuals from varied backgrounds can introduce novel ideas and challenge conventional patterns of thought. Finally, setting aside dedicated time for reflection and ideation allows me to synthesize insights and enhance creative outputs (Amabile, 1996; Sternberg & Lubart, 1999).

References

• Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in Context. Westview Press.
• Jehn, K. A., & Bendersky, C. (2003). Involvement and conflict in workgroups. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48(3), 531–558.
• Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1999). The concept of creativity: Creative thinking as a decision. Creativity Research Journal, 12(4), 329–335.
• Tuckman, B. W. (1965). Developmental sequence in small groups. Psychological Bulletin, 63(6), 384–399.
• Runco, M. A., & Acar, S. (2012). Divergent thinking as an indicator of creative potential. Creativity Research Journal, 24(1), 66–75.
• Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). Creativity: Flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. HarperCollins.
• Baer, J., & Kaufman, J. C. (2005). Bridging generality and specificity: The creative achievement questionnaire. Journal of Creative Behavior, 39(1), 5–24.
• Teece, D. J. (2000). Managing technological knowledge: Intellectual property and commercialization strategies in American manufacturing. California Management Review, 42(2), 8–30.
• Finke, R. A., Ward, T. B., & Smith, S. M. (1992). Creative Greater than the Sum of Its Parts: The Role of Divergent Thinking. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 6(1), 36–43.
• Barron, F., & Harrington, D. M. (1981). Creativity, intelligence, and personality. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 15(4), 226–255.