Discussion: Consider The Following Scenario Mike Is A Sociol

Discusson 1consider The Following Scenariomike Is A Sociology Student

Consider the following scenario: Mike is a sociology student at a local university in the Chicago area. He has decided to conduct a random poll to determine the political make-up of the community in general, including the city of Chicago. Mike conducts his survey at the Woodfield Mall in the suburb of Schaumburg, IL. He interviews people at the local Barnes and Noble and asks questions about their political affiliation and beliefs. The interviews are conducted in one day on a cold January night when the temperature is -5 degrees below zero.

On this particular occasion, Barnes and Noble is hosting a special sale for Gay and Lesbian literature. Guest speakers are also present. Mike interviews about 25 people and declares the following: The Chicago area is mostly a mix of White Republicans and Gay and Lesbian Democrats, with neither cohort being more predominant than the other. Discuss the following: What biases are present in Mike's results? Identify as many biases as possible. Explain what factors create bias in this study. Be specific. Please give examples.

Paper For Above instruction

In analyzing Mike's sociological poll, it is essential to recognize the various biases that may have influenced the validity and reliability of his findings. Biases in research refer to systematic errors that skew results, leading to inaccurate or unrepresentative conclusions. Several forms of bias are evident in Mike's scenario, each stemming from factors related to sample selection, timing, location, and external influences.

Sampling Bias

One of the most prominent biases in Mike's survey is sampling bias. Sampling bias occurs when the sample studied does not accurately represent the broader population being examined. By conducting his survey exclusively at Woodfield Mall in Schaumburg and interviewing only those inside Barnes and Noble during a single night, Mike's sample likely overrepresents certain demographic groups. For example, the shoppers at this particular store on a cold winter night might primarily include middle- to upper-middle-class individuals, older adults, or those with specific interests in literature and education, such as members of the LGBTQ+ community attending the bookstore's special event. This non-random, convenience sampling excludes significant portions of the Chicago community, especially those who do not visit malls or bookstores during cold nights or who may have different political views.

Furthermore, the small sample size of approximately 25 people exacerbates the bias, as it lacks the statistical power to generalize findings to the entire metropolitan area reliably. A larger, more diverse sample across different neighborhoods, times, and venues would reduce this bias and produce more representative results.

Selection Bias

Selection bias arises when the participants selected are not representative of the population due to the method of selection. In this scenario, Mike's location and timing contribute to the selection bias. For instance, the fact that interviews took place during a special event at Barnes and Noble, which focuses on Gay and Lesbian literature, might attract individuals who are more likely to identify as gay or lesbian or be sympathetic to LGBTQ+ issues. This creates an overrepresentation of this demographic, inflating their presence in the survey results. Conversely, individuals who might hold different political affiliations or beliefs—perhaps more conservative or not interested in LGBTQ+ topics—may choose not to visit such an event or may be less likely to participate in the survey.

Additionally, the choice of conducting interviews during a winter night might exclude those who work late shifts or are otherwise unavailable, further biasing the sample.

Response Bias

Response bias refers to the tendency of respondents to answer questions in a manner they believe is socially acceptable or desirable rather than truthfully. Given the sensitive nature of political beliefs and the context of an LGBTQ+-specific event, participants might have tailored their responses to conform to perceived social norms or to avoid judgment. For example, individuals attending a LGBTQ+ themed event might feel compelled to present themselves as supportive or aligned with like-minded individuals, influencing their responses about political affiliation. This phenomenon can lead to an overreporting of certain identities or beliefs, skewing the results.

Environmental Bias

Environmental factors, such as the setting and weather, can also introduce bias. Conducting interviews during a particularly cold night likely limited participation to those who are motivated or available to brave the weather, possibly skewing the sample toward specific demographic groups—perhaps older adults or transit-dependent individuals—whose interest or necessity overrides the discomfort of cold weather. This environmental bias limits the representativeness of the sample, as it excludes those who might be less inclined or physically able to participate under adverse weather conditions.

Confirmation Bias

Another potential bias is confirmation bias, where Mike’s expectations about the community's political makeup may influence how he interprets the responses. If Mike initially believed that the community was divided equally between Republicans and Democrats, he might inadvertently focus on responses that support this view, disregarding data that suggests otherwise. Confirmation bias can distort the analysis and reporting of findings, especially in small, informal surveys with limited validation processes.

Influence of Social Desirability

Participants might also have been influenced by social desirability bias, where respondents provide answers they perceive as more socially acceptable. For example, during a LGBTQ+ event, participants might feel compelled to identify as supportive Democrats or support gay and lesbian rights, even if their true political beliefs differ. This social pressure can lead to overrepresenting certain political affiliations and affiliations aligned with the event's themes.

Conclusion

In conclusion, multiple biases—sampling, selection, response, environmental, confirmation, and social desirability—are present in Mike’s survey. These biases stem from the location, timing, method of participant recruitment, and external sociocultural influences. To improve the accuracy of such surveys, researchers should employ random sampling across varied locations and times, ensure anonymity to reduce response bias, and expand sample sizes to promote representativeness. Recognizing and addressing these biases is crucial to obtaining a more accurate understanding of the community's political landscape.

References

• Babbie, E. (2015). The Practice of Social Research (14th ed.). Cengage Learning.
• Fowler, F. J. (2014). Survey Research Methods (5th ed.). Sage Publications.
• Levine, R. A., & Rubin, D. S. (2018). Statistics for Managers Using Microsoft Excel. Pearson.
• Neuman, W. L. (2014). Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches (7th ed.). Pearson.
• Salkind, N. J. (2017). Statistics for People Who (Think They) Hate Statistics. Sage Publications.
• Singh, G. (2013). Fundamentals of Research Methodology: A Guide for Researchers. New Age International.
• Groves, R. M., et al. (2009). Survey Methodology (2nd ed.). Wiley.
• Nardi, P. M. (2018). Doing Survey Research: A Guide to Quantitative Methods. Routledge.
• Bryman, A., & Bell, E. (2015). Business Research Methods (4th ed.). Oxford University Press.
• Babbie, E. (2016). The Basics of Social Research (6th ed.). Cengage Learning.