Discussion Question: Formulating The Research Questio 830608

Discussion Questionformulating The Research Question Problem Statemen

Discussing the formulation of the research question, problem statement, and research purpose based on the review of literature and previous feedback. Specifically, it involves refining the problem and proposed solution, designing a research question with PICOT components, and ensuring the question is answerable, feasible, and relevant.

Paper For Above instruction

Formulating a clear and precise research question is a fundamental step in conducting meaningful and impactful research. The process begins with a well-defined problem statement that articulates the issue or gap identified in the literature or practice. The problem statement should be specific enough to guide the research and inspire an appropriate solution. For example, if reviewing for a nursing practice setting, the problem might relate to high patient readmission rates due to inadequate discharge education, with a proposed solution involving enhanced patient education protocols.

Following this, establishing a research purpose aligns the study's goals with addressing the identified problem. The purpose statement clearly states what the research intends to accomplish, such as evaluating the effectiveness of a specific intervention to improve patient outcomes or exploring the experiences of a particular patient group. A focused purpose guides the development of a research question that is both answerable and relevant.

To further refine the research question, the PICOT framework provides a structured approach. PICOT stands for Population/Patient Problem, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome, and Time, offering a comprehensive way to formulate questions particularly suitable for clinical research. For example, considering a study on a new wound care protocol: the PICOT components might be as follows:

  • Patient, Population, or Problem: Patients with chronic diabetic foot ulcers aged 50-70.
  • Intervention: Implementation of a novel wound dressing combined with adjunctive therapy.
  • Comparison: Standard wound dressings and routine care.
  • Outcome: Reduction in healing time and rate of infection.
  • Time: Six-week follow-up period.

The formulated research question could then be: "In patients aged 50-70 with chronic diabetic foot ulcers, does the use of a novel wound dressing combined with adjunctive therapy, compared to standard dressings, reduce healing time and infection rates over six weeks?"

This question provides a clear focus and ensures that the study remains within feasible, answerable, and clinically relevant bounds. It's essential that research questions remain aligned with the literature review to ensure they address real gaps or needs identified in current evidence. Moreover, they should be specific enough to guide data collection and analysis while remaining broad enough to be meaningful.

In drafting the research question, it is also important to consider the feasibility aspects, including available resources, access to patient populations, and ethical constraints. The question should be answerable within the scope of the researcher’s setting and timeframe, and it should contribute valuable knowledge to the clinical or academic community. By adhering to these principles, the research can generate evidence that supports improvements in practice and health outcomes.

In conclusion, the process of defining the research question involves careful consideration of the problem, supporting literature, and the PICOT components to ensure the resulting question is pertinent, answerable, and capable of guiding effective research design. Developing a well-structured question not only clarifies the research aims but also enhances the potential for practical and impactful findings in the relevant field.

References

  • Melnyk, B. M., & Fineout-Overholt, E. (2015). Evidence-based practice in nursing & healthcare: A guide to best practice. Wolters Kluwer Health.
  • Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2017). Nursing research: Generating and assessing evidence for nursing practice. Wolters Kluwer.
  • Craig, J. V., & Smyth, R. L. (2017). The evidence-based practice manual for nurses. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
  • Schmidt, N. A., & Brown, J. M. (2019). Evidence-based practice for nurses: Appraisal and application of research. Jones & Bartlett Learning.
  • Tappen, R. M. (2016). Advanced nursing research: From theory to practice. Jones & Bartlett Learning.
  • SACKETT, D. L., & BALDWIN, L. M. (2014). Evidence-based practice: A practical guide for healthcare professionals. Jones & Bartlett Learning.
  • Hannes, K., & Lockwood, C. (2017). Synthesizing qualitative research: Choosing the right approach. Evidence-Based Nursing, 20(2), 39-40.
  • Gray, J. R., Grove, S. K., & Sutherland, S. (2017). Understanding nursing research: Building an evidence-based practice. Elsevier Health Sciences.
  • LoBiondo-Wood, G., & Haber, J. (2017). Nursing research: Methods and critical appraisal for evidence-based practice. Elsevier Health Sciences.
  • Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage publications.