Discussion Question: Please Provide At Least A 250-Wo 658074

Discussion Questionplease Provide At Least A 250 Word Response Pleas

Discussion Question: Please provide at least a 250-word response. Please provide a doctoral response. What is meant by research ethics? What are the three categories of review a research proposal can receive from the Institutional Review Board (IRB)? Completely explain each type of review.

Paper For Above instruction

Research ethics are fundamental principles that guide researchers to conduct their studies responsibly, ensuring the rights, dignity, and well-being of participants are protected. These ethics encompass honesty, integrity, transparency, respect for persons, beneficence, and justice. Upholding these principles mitigates the potential for harm, maintains public trust in research, and ensures the credibility of scientific findings. Ethical research practices include obtaining informed consent, ensuring confidentiality, and minimizing risks associated with participation. Researchers must adhere to institutional and legal guidelines to promote responsible conduct, which is critical in fostering a trustworthy research environment and avoiding misconduct such as fabrication, falsification, or plagiarism.

The Institutional Review Board (IRB) plays a pivotal role in safeguarding ethical standards in research involving human subjects. It categorizes review processes into three types based on the level of risk involved: exempt review, expedited review, and full board review. Each serves to ensure that research complies with ethical principles while accommodating different levels of risk and complexity.

Exempt review is designated for research involving minimal risk to participants and fits specific federal criteria. Examples include anonymous surveys or analyses of publicly available data. Although labeled 'exempt,' it still requires IRB determination to ensure compliance. Expedited review involves research that presents no more than minimal risk but does not qualify as exempt. This process is conducted by a designated IRB reviewer or committee chair and typically covers research involving minor modifications to previously approved research or certain vulnerable populations. Lastly, full board review is reserved for research posing more than minimal risk, such as studies involving vulnerable populations, invasive procedures, or sensitive data. The entire IRB convenes to scrutinize the proposal thoroughly, ensuring all ethical considerations are addressed comprehensively.

In conclusion, research ethics fundamentally center on protecting human participants and maintaining integrity in scholarly inquiry. The IRB's three-tiered review process strives to balance the advancement of knowledge with the safeguarding of individual rights, thus fostering ethical standards within the research community.

References

  • American Psychological Association. (2020). Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct. APA Publishing.
  • Levine, R. J. (2016). Ethics and Regulation of Clinical Research (4th ed.). JHU Press.
  • Resnik, D. B. (2018). The Ethics of Research with Human Subjects: Protecting Participants and Promoting Scientific Progress. Routledge.
  • National Institutes of Health. (2019). When and How to Submit Protocols to an IRB. NIH Guidelines.
  • World Health Organization. (2011). Standards and Operational Guidance for Ethics Review of Health-Related Research WHO Document.
  • Sarke, E., & Schwieterman, J. (2017). Ethical dimensions of research review: Examining the IRB process. Journal of Ethics in Research, 22(3), 215-233.
  • Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences (CIOMS). (2016). International Ethical Guidelines for Health-Related Research Involving Humans.
  • Beauchamp, T. L., & Childress, J. F. (2013). Principles of Biomedical Ethics (7th ed.). Oxford University Press.
  • Hulley, S., et al. (2013). Designing Clinical Research (4th ed.). Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
  • McWilliams, S. A. (2019). Ethical considerations in research. Journal of Research Administration, 50(1), 45-59.

Related Assignments