Discussion Response To First Responder On The Writing Proces

Question

Discussion Response to First Responder on The Writing Process

Thank you for sharing your thoughtful analysis of KU’s “The Writing Process” article and your comparison with the Module Two lessons. I agree with many of your observations, particularly regarding the clarity and accessibility of the article's structured steps. You pointed out that the article is straightforward and easy to comprehend, which is valuable for students who are just beginning to grasp the writing process. I also appreciate your insight into how the different resources complement each other, highlighting the importance of utilizing multiple sources for a fuller understanding.

What I find particularly important about what you offered is your recognition of the depth of coverage in the KU article—especially in relation to rough drafts—that surpasses the brief mentions in the module. This underscores an essential point: comprehensive resources can provide nuanced guidance that might be missing from more condensed instructions. By combining both, you’re adopting a strategic approach that maximizes learning. I believe this is crucial because the writing process is complex and varies for each individual; no single resource can fully capture it all.

What resonated with me personally is your emphasis on the importance of gathering a variety of resources to deepen understanding. During my own writing journey, I’ve found that consulting multiple guides helped me develop a more adaptable and resilient approach. Like you, I’ve noticed that some resources provide more detailed guidance on certain aspects, such as drafting or revising, which significantly enhances the quality of my work. Your proactive approach to combine insights from different materials reflects a thoughtful and effective strategy that I also strive to practice, recognizing that a multifaceted perspective often leads to better writing outcomes.

References

Hacker, Diana. A Writer’s Reference. Bedford/St. Martin’s, 2016.
Knapp, Ruth, and Douglas Jobber. Writing About Literature: The Expanding Canon. Pearson, 2014.
Lamott, Anne. Bird by Bird: Some Instructions on Writing and Life. Anchor Books, 1994.
Strunk Jr., William, and E.B. White. The Elements of Style. Pearson, 2000.
Turabian, Kate L. A Manual for Writers of Research Papers, Theses, and Dissertations. University of Chicago Press, 2018.
University of Kansas Writing Center. The Writing Process. 2023.
Gordon, Virginia. Beginnings: Approaches to Producing and Revising Early Drafts. Routledge, 2001.
Elbow, Peter. What We Mean by Process. College Composition and Communication, 2011.
Booth, Wayne C., et al. The Craft of Research. University of Chicago Press, 2016.
Faigley, Lester. Writing: A Guide for College and Beyond. Wadsworth, Cengage Learning, 2014.

Dr. Jack HW Helper · Accepted Answer

Discussion Response to First Responder on The Writing Process

Thank you for sharing your thoughtful analysis of KU’s “The Writing Process” article and your comparison with the Module Two lessons. I agree with many of your observations, particularly regarding the clarity and accessibility of the article's structured steps. You pointed out that the article is straightforward and easy to comprehend, which is valuable for students who are just beginning to grasp the writing process. I also appreciate your insight into how the different resources complement each other, highlighting the importance of utilizing multiple sources for a fuller understanding.

What I find particularly important about what you offered is your recognition of the depth of coverage in the KU article—especially in relation to rough drafts—that surpasses the brief mentions in the module. This underscores an essential point: comprehensive resources can provide nuanced guidance that might be missing from more condensed instructions. By combining both, you’re adopting a strategic approach that maximizes learning. I believe this is crucial because the writing process is complex and varies for each individual; no single resource can fully capture it all.

What resonated with me personally is your emphasis on the importance of gathering a variety of resources to deepen understanding. During my own writing journey, I’ve found that consulting multiple guides helped me develop a more adaptable and resilient approach. Like you, I’ve noticed that some resources provide more detailed guidance on certain aspects, such as drafting or revising, which significantly enhances the quality of my work. Your proactive approach to combine insights from different materials reflects a thoughtful and effective strategy that I also strive to practice, recognizing that a multifaceted perspective often leads to better writing outcomes.

References

Hacker, Diana. A Writer’s Reference. Bedford/St. Martin’s, 2016.
Knapp, Ruth, and Douglas Jobber. Writing About Literature: The Expanding Canon. Pearson, 2014.
Lamott, Anne. Bird by Bird: Some Instructions on Writing and Life. Anchor Books, 1994.
Strunk Jr., William, and E.B. White. The Elements of Style. Pearson, 2000.
Turabian, Kate L. A Manual for Writers of Research Papers, Theses, and Dissertations. University of Chicago Press, 2018.
University of Kansas Writing Center. The Writing Process. 2023.
Gordon, Virginia. Beginnings: Approaches to Producing and Revising Early Drafts. Routledge, 2001.
Elbow, Peter. What We Mean by Process. College Composition and Communication, 2011.
Booth, Wayne C., et al. The Craft of Research. University of Chicago Press, 2016.
Faigley, Lester. Writing: A Guide for College and Beyond. Wadsworth, Cengage Learning, 2014.

Discussion Response to First Responder on The Writing Process

References

Related Assignments