Discussion Rubric: Graduate Your Active Participation 296986

Discussion Rubric Graduateyour Active Participation In The Discussion

Discussion Rubric: Graduate Your active participation in the discussion forums is essential to your overall success this term. Discussion questions are designed to help you make meaningful connections between the course content and the larger concepts and goals of the course. These discussions offer you the opportunity to express your own thoughts, ask questions for clarification, and gain insight from your classmates’ responses and instructor’s guidance.

Requirements for Discussion Board Assignments Students are required to post one (1) initial post and to follow up with at least two (2) response posts for each discussion board assignment. For your initial post (1) you must: · Compose a post of one to two paragraphs · Complete the initial post by Thursday at 11:59 PM EST of the module week · Take into consideration material such as course content and other discussion boards from the current module and previous modules, when appropriate For your response posts (2) you must: · Reply to at least two different classmates outside of your own initial post thread · Complete the two response posts by Sunday at 11:59 PM EST · Demonstrate more depth and thought than simply stating “I agree” or “You are wrong.” Guidance is provided for you in each discussion prompt.

Rubric Critical Elements Distinguished Proficient Emerging Not Evident Value Comprehension Develops an initial post with an organized, clear point of view or idea using rich and significant detail (18–20) Develops an initial post with a point of view or idea using appropriate detail (16–17) Develops an initial post with a point of view or idea but with some gaps in organization and detail (14–15) Does not develop an initial post with an organized point of view or idea (0–). Timeliness Submits initial post on time by Thursday at 11:59 PM EST (10) Submits initial post by Friday at 11:59 PM EST, one day late (7) Submits initial post by Saturday at 11:59 PM EST, two days late (4) Submits initial post by Sunday at 11:59 PM EST, three days late (0–). Engagement Provides relevant and meaningful response posts with clarifying explanation and detail (18–20) Provides relevant response posts with some explanation and detail (16–17) Provides somewhat relevant response posts with some explanation and detail (14–15) Provides response posts that are generic with little explanation or detail (0–). Critical Thinking Draws insightful conclusions that are thoroughly defended with evidence and examples (27–30) Draws informed conclusions that are justified with evidence (24–26) Draws logical conclusions (21–23) Does not draw logical conclusions (0–). Writing (Mechanics) Initial post and responses are easily understood, clear, and concise using proper citation methods where applicable with no errors in citations (18–20) Initial post and responses are easily understood using proper citation methods where applicable with few errors in citations (16–17) Initial post and responses are understandable using proper citation methods where applicable with a number of errors in citations (14–15) Initial post and responses are not understandable and do not use proper citation methods where applicable (0–). Earned Total Comments: 100%

Paper For Above instruction

The discussion prompts outlined emphasize the importance of active participation and critical engagement in graduate-level online forums. Among the key areas are understanding why organizations fail in change initiatives, sharing personal change stories, and analyzing perspectives on globalization. Engaged discussion fosters deeper learning by connecting theory to practice and encouraging diverse viewpoints. The importance of timely posting, analytical depth, and clarity in communication are heavily underscored, with rubrics highlighting the expectations for quality and participation.

First, the exploration of organizational change failure reveals that a predominant reason is resistance from employees and organizational culture. An article by Kotter (1995) emphasizes that change efforts often falter without sufficient buy-in from stakeholders, or due to poor communication and lack of leadership commitment. Resistance stems from fear of the unknown and attachment to existing routines. From my perspective, it is crucial for leadership to actively involve employees early in the process and communicate transparently to mitigate resistance. Only through fostering trust and participation can change initiatives succeed (Burke, 2017).

Secondly, reflecting on personal change stories allows recognition of common themes such as fear of failure, lack of support, and the importance of adaptability. The stories echo the change lessons outlined in Table 1.1 of the textbook, such as resilience and effective communication. Analyzing these personal experiences emphasizes that managing change requires emotional intelligence and strategic planning. The differences lie in individual circumstances, yet overcoming resistance remains a universal challenge. These reflections suggest that future change efforts—whether in organizations or personal contexts—must prioritize stakeholder engagement and flexibility.

Third, the debate on globalization examines its dichotomous effects. Some argue globalization promotes economic growth, cultural exchange, and innovation—beneficial for many. Conversely, critics highlight environmental degradation, cultural erosion, and economic inequality as adverse outcomes. Websites like Globalization101.org and BBC News offer contrasting viewpoints. For example, the KOF Index evidences increased connectivity, but also points to disparities in who benefits. In my view, globalization's impact varies based on local context, policies, and societal readiness to adapt to change. Societies that manage globalization strategically can harness its benefits while minimizing harm, whereas unregulated global integration can exacerbate inequalities (Stiglitz, 2002).

Overall, active participation in discussions enhances critical thinking, exposes learners to varied perspectives, and develops communication skills vital for leadership in complex environments. The key to success lies in respectful dialogue, timely contributions, and thorough analytical reasoning, all underpinning graduate-level academic discourse.

References

• Burke, W. W. (2017). Organization change: Theory and practice. Sage publications.
• Kotter, J. P. (1995). Leading change: Why transformation efforts fail. Harvard Business Review, 73(2), 59-67.
• Stiglitz, J. E. (2002). Globalization and its discontents. W.W. Norton & Company.
• Globalization101.org. (n.d.). What is globalization? Retrieved from https://www.globalization101.org/
• BBC News. (n.d.). Globalization. Retrieved from https://www.bbc.com/news
• Unhappy Planet Index. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.planetindex.org/
• KOF Index of Globalization]. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://kof.ethz.ch/en/
• Additional scholarly sources relevant to organizational change and globalization considerations.