Doctorate Level Questions No Plagiarism Paraphrase Th 340903

Doctorate Level Questions No Plagiarismparaphrase The Conten

Doctorate Level Questions No Plagiarism....Paraphrase the content, and provide Citations and References for each source provided....Please provide a substantive response for EACH question. Each question should each have a word count of 150 words or more....Please provide appropriate foundational knowledge, be factual, and enhance the dialogue….Please do not recite the same words just to provide word count….

Question One Please share the tentative research design from your prospectus and provide a brief rationale for it. Also include the research question(s) and the associated hypotheses (for quantitative studies only) in their current state and describe how they align with your proposed research design. What questions or concerns do you have surrounding your work at this point?

Question Two Reflect on the information presented in this course. How will the information on finding a content expert influence your research plans? When did the course information give you new insight on your proposed research methodology and design for your dissertation research study? Will this new insight change anything in your prospectus? If so, what steps will you take to update your prospectus? Explain.

Paper For Above instruction

Understanding and developing a robust research design is crucial at the doctoral level, as it directly influences the validity and reliability of the study’s findings. In my tentative research plan, I have opted for a mixed-methods design that combines qualitative and quantitative approaches to provide a comprehensive understanding of the research problem. The quantitative component aims to test specific hypotheses regarding the relationship between variables, while the qualitative aspect seeks to explore broader contextual factors. My research questions focus on identifying the correlations between key variables and understanding participants’ lived experiences related to the phenomenon under study. The associated hypotheses, formulated based on existing literature, posit significant relationships that can be empirically tested. This alignment ensures that the research design complements the objectives—quantitative measures for hypothesis testing and qualitative insights for contextual richness. Currently, my concerns revolve around operationalizing constructs effectively and ensuring adequate sample size to achieve statistical power. Additionally, integrating qualitative and quantitative data coherently remains a challenge, necessitating careful planning and methodological rigor.

Reflecting on the insights gained from this course, learning how to identify and consult with content experts has been particularly impactful. Content experts provide invaluable guidance, ensuring that the research questions are relevant, the methodology appropriate, and the interpretation of data accurate. The course materials highlighted the importance of interdisciplinary consultation to refine research tools and enhance credibility. A notable insight was realizing how early engagement with experts can prevent potential methodological pitfalls. This course also illuminated new perspectives on designing a robust research methodology, especially emphasizing the need for mixed-methods designs in complex social phenomena. This insight has prompted me to revisit my dissertation proposal critically. I plan to incorporate more detailed plans for stakeholder engagement and expert consultation, which will likely refine my research questions and methodology. To update my prospectus, I intend to document these planned consultations and integrate feedback systematically, thereby strengthening the overall research framework.

References

• Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Sage Publications.
• Yin, R. K. (2017). Case study research and applications: Design and methods. Sage Publications.
• Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
• Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2018). Research methods in education (8th ed.). Routledge.
• Maxwell, J. A. (2013). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach. Sage Publications.
• Bryman, A. (2016). Social research methods (5th ed.). Oxford University Press.
• Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Leech, N. L. (2012). Validity and reliability in mixed methods research. The English Journal, 101(3), 48–54.
• Flick, U. (2018). An introduction to qualitative research (6th ed.). Sage Publications.
• Silverman, D. (2016). Qualitative research. Sage Publications.
• Hammersley, M. (2019). The guide to social science methods. Routledge.