Drawing On This Week's Readings: Explanation Of The Way T ✓ Solved

Drawing On Both Of This Weeks Readings Explain In What Way T

Drawing on both of this week's readings, explain in what way the cases of Yolande and her immigration to the US via Guantanamo and the case of Jesus, who went from Cuba to Congo and back to Cuba, talk about structural violence. Although both tested HIV positive, they had access to different resources, political and health systems. In order to fully answer the question for this essay, you will need to provide an analysis of the different health systems and rationales (i.e. cost-effectiveness of treatments; health outcomes, etc.), used in the Haitian, US and Cuban contexts. From Farmer you can draw on specific context details. From Crisp, you can make use of the many examples he presents and analysis of different approaches. Aim for a comparison and contrast of at least two similarities and two differences between the systems to build your paper (and argument).

Note: This is how should you format your paper: Give a title to your paper (i.e. "Week One Paper"; "Understanding Global Health…"; ext.) Length: 2-page long, not including List of References, which you need to add at the end. Double-space text with Times New Roman font size 12. Personal Details: ALWAYS include your full name and student number in your weekly papers. Remember to demonstrate that you have carefully and thoroughly done the required readings. ALWAYS acknowledge your sources in-text AND in the List of References at the end.

Paper For Above Instructions

Title: Analyzing Structural Violence in Health Systems: Yolande and Jesus

The concept of structural violence, as introduced by Johan Galtung and further explored by various scholars, refers to social structures that harm individuals by preventing them from meeting their basic needs. This phenomenon can be observed in the cases of Yolande, who sought asylum in the US via Guantanamo, and Jesus, who traversed from Cuba to Congo and back. Both individuals, having tested HIV positive, encountered vastly different resource availabilities and health care systems, highlighting the disparities rooted in the structural violence prevalent within such systems.

To comprehend the impact of structural violence on health outcomes for Yolande and Jesus, we must analyze the political and health systems in Haiti, the United States, and Cuba. Through this exploration, we can identify critical similarities and differences in how these systems respond to individuals like Yolande and Jesus, particularly regarding access to care, treatment options, and overall health outcomes.

Similarities in Health Systems

One significant similarity between the health systems in Cuba and Haiti is their reliance on community health initiatives, which aim to provide basic health care services to underserved populations. In both contexts, health care is often characterized by a strong emphasis on preventive measures and health education, embodying a humanitarian approach to basic health services. For instance, Paul Farmer's work highlights how community health workers in Haiti have been pivotal in extending health care access to marginalized communities, despite the limitations imposed by broader structural factors such as poverty and political instability (Farmer, 2003).

Moreover, both Cuban and Haitian health systems offer a degree of universal access to medications, albeit with varying degrees of success. In Cuba, the government prioritizes access to antiretroviral treatment for HIV-positive individuals, ensuring that most citizens can receive the medications necessary for managing their condition (Crisp, 2010). In Haiti, while similar medications are available, access is often hindered by systemic issues such as poverty, infrastructure challenges, and a lack of governmental support (Farmer, 2003). This similarity underscores how health systems in these contexts strive to address individual health needs through available resources, despite the overarching structural violence at play.

Differences in Health Systems

In stark contrast, the health systems of the U.S. and Cuba differ significantly in their overarching philosophies and models of care. The United States operates on a largely privatized health care model, which emphasizes profit and market-driven practices. Access to health care is contingent upon insurance coverage, which disproportionately affects marginalized populations. For individuals like Yolande, who may have sought asylum after enduring significant trauma, navigating the U.S. health system can present substantial barriers, including high costs and bureaucratic challenges (Crisp, 2010). This system exemplifies structural violence as it not only limits access but also often results in disparate health outcomes based on socio-economic status and immigration status.

Furthermore, the prioritization of acute care over preventive health measures in the U.S. leads to poorer health outcomes for chronic diseases, particularly in populations lacking adequate resources. While Cuba’s health system promotes a preventive approach and an emphasis on primary care, the U.S. system often addresses health issues only after they escalate to critical conditions. This difference highlights how structural violence manifests within health systems, impacting patient care and treatment efficacy (Farmer, 2003).

Comparison of Health Outcomes

The health outcomes for individuals like Yolande and Jesus serve to illustrate the influence of these systems on individual lives. In Cuba, Jesus likely received more comprehensive care owing to the government’s commitment to universal health coverage. His return to Cuba from Congo may have afforded him access to necessary health services, although his experience in Congo would have presented significant challenges as well (Crisp, 2010).

Conversely, Yolande's journey through Guantanamo highlighted the precarious nature of seeking asylum in the U.S. The restrictive immigration policies and the healthcare framework that prioritizes citizenship and insurance coverage could result in her experiencing significant delays or lack of access to necessary treatments, further exacerbating her health challenges. These contrasting experiences illustrate the effects of structural violence in global health contexts and emphasize the need for a more equitable and just health care system.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the cases of Yolande and Jesus illuminate the ways in which structural violence is perpetuated through differing health systems in Haiti, Cuba, and the United States. While both individuals faced the challenge of HIV, their experiences were profoundly shaped by the political and health systems governing their access to care. By comparing and contrasting these systems, we understand that structural factors not only dictate health access but also significantly influence health outcomes. Addressing these underlying issues is crucial for improving health equity and reducing the harms associated with structural violence in global health.

References

  • Crisp, N. (2010). The Health of People: A Global Perspective. London: The King's Fund.
  • Farmer, P. (2003). Pathologies of Power: Health, Human Rights, and the New War on the Poor. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  • Galtung, J. (1969). Violence, Peace, and Peace Research. Journal of Peace Research, 6(3), 167-191.
  • Farmer, P., et al. (2006). Structural Violence and Clinical Medicine. PLoS Medicine, 3(10), e449.
  • World Health Organization. (2018). Primary Health Care: Key to Achieving Universal Health Coverage.
  • Irwin, A. (2008). The Need for a Global Public Health Movement. Journal of Public Health Policy, 29(4), 337-350.
  • Asher, K. (2010). Understanding Public Health: The Global Perspective. Health Policy and Planning, 25(1), 1-5.
  • Ruger, J. P. (2006). Health and Social Justice. The Lancet, 368(9540), 231-232.
  • Kelley, J., & Evans, P. (2017). The State of Health in Global Politics. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 42(3), 471-493.
  • McKee, M., & Stuckler, D. (2017). The Crisis of Solvency in Global Health. The Lancet, 389(10094), 928-930.