Due Date June 19, 2018 Requirements Word Document 9-12 Pages
Due Date June 19 2018requirementsword Document 9 12 Pages Time New
Due Date June 19 2018requirementsword Document 9 12 Pages Time New
Create policies that are DoD compliant for the organization’s IT infrastructure. Develop a list of compliance laws required for DoD contracts. List controls placed on domains in the IT infrastructure. List required standards for all devices, categorized by IT domain. Develop a deployment plan for implementation of these policies, standards, and controls. List all applicable DoD frameworks in the final delivery document. Write a professional report that includes all of the above content-related items.
Paper For Above instruction
The task at hand involves developing comprehensive, Department of Defense (DoD) compliant security policies tailored to an organization’s IT infrastructure. This includes establishing policies that meet DoD standards, identifying relevant compliance laws, detailing controls and standards across different IT domains, and creating a strategic deployment plan. Additionally, the final report must incorporate all applicable DoD frameworks, ensuring the organization aligns with high security and operational standards necessary for handling DoD contracts.
Introduction
The acquisition of a significant DoD contract presents both an opportunity and a responsibility for the organization, necessitating the implementation of strict security policies to ensure compliance with federal standards. These policies are crucial not just for contractual obligations but also for safeguarding sensitive information and maintaining operational integrity. This paper delineates a structured approach to developing and deploying DoD-compliant security policies, providing a comprehensive overview suitable for high-stakes government contracting.
DoD Security Policies for IT Infrastructure
Effective security policies form the backbone of compliance in a DoD environment. These policies must adhere to standards outlined in directives such as DoDI 8500.01 and DoDI 8510.01, emphasizing risk management, information assurance, and vulnerability management. Key policies include access control, incident response, physical security, configuration management, and personnel security.
For instance, an access control policy must enforce least privilege principles, require multifactor authentication, and delineate procedures for granting and revoking access. Incident response policies should include steps for reporting, analyzing, and mitigating breaches, aligned with DoD instructions for cybersecurity incident management. Physical security policies must restrict physical access to sensitive infrastructure, utilizing badges, surveillance, and environment controls. Configuration management policies ensure that all hardware and software configurations are documented, authorized, and regularly reviewed.
Compliance Laws Required for DoD Contracts
Compliance with federal laws and standards is mandatory for DoD contracts. These include the Federal Information Security Management Act (FISMA), Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS), International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR), and the NIST Special Publication 800-53 controls. FISMA mandates an overarching framework for protecting federal information systems, emphasizing security categorization and continuous monitoring.
DFARS requires compliance with specific cybersecurity standards, including the implementation of NIST SP 800-171 requirements for protecting Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI). The ITAR imposes restrictions on the handling and sharing of defense-related technology and data. Lastly, adherence to NIST frameworks ensures a structured approach to risk management and security controls.
Controls Placed on Domains within the IT Infrastructure
Controls are implemented across various IT domains to safeguard assets and data integrity. On the server domain, controls include regular patch management, access restrictions, and audit logging. In the network domain, controls include firewalls, intrusion detection/prevention systems, and data encryption. Devices such as PCs and laptops require endpoint security solutions, physical security measures, and configuration standards.
For example, servers hosting critical applications must adhere to strict access controls, ensure data encryption at rest and in transit, and undergo routine vulnerability scans. Network controls involve segmentation, secure VPN access, and continuous monitoring. End-user devices must enforce strong password policies, have updated antivirus software, and utilize full disk encryption where applicable.
Standards for Devices Categorized by IT Domain
Device standards are essential for ensuring compatibility, security, and operational efficiency. In the server domain, standards encompass operating system configurations, secure boot processes, and compliance with Security Technical Implementation Guides (STIGs). Linux servers hosting Apache should follow best practices for hardening the OS, including disabling unnecessary services and applying security patches regularly.
In the client domain, computers running Windows 7 must adhere to policies enforcing password complexity, automatic updates, and disabling unused features. All devices must comply with approved antivirus and anti-malware solutions, enabled firewalls, and encrypted storage. Mobile devices (if applicable) should follow Bring Your Own Device (BYOD) policies strictly aligned with security standards.
Deployment Plan for Policy Implementation
The deployment process begins with a detailed gap analysis to identify current security shortfalls. Next, a phased implementation approach entails training staff, deploying security tools, updating configurations, and conducting security assessments at each stage. The deployment plan includes clear milestones, responsible personnel, and contingency procedures.
The initial phase involves policy dissemination and staff awareness programs. Subsequently, technical controls are installed, such as firewalls, intrusion detection systems, and endpoint protection. Periodic testing and audits help ensure adherence and effectiveness. A feedback loop enables continuous improvement, with regular updates to policies and controls based on emerging threats and technological advancements.
Applicable DoD Frameworks
The final documentation must list all relevant DoD-specific frameworks, including the Risk Management Framework (RMF), which guides system authorization and continuous monitoring. The Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification (CMMC) framework may also be applicable, especially for contractors handling CUI. Other relevant standards include the DoDI 8510 series for IA (Information Assurance) and the Security Technical Implementation Guides (STIGs) for configuration baselines. These frameworks facilitate the organization’s compliance, security posture, and audit readiness.
Conclusion
Successfully securing a DoD contract requires meticulous development and implementation of security policies aligned with federal standards. By establishing comprehensive policies, understanding applicable laws, deploying rigorous controls, and following structured frameworks, the organization can meet DoD requirements effectively. This proactive approach not only ensures compliance but also enhances overall cybersecurity resilience, safeguarding critical assets in a highly sensitive environment.
References
- Department of Defense. (2015). Department of Defense Instruction (DoDI) 8500.01: Cybersecurity. Washington, D.C.
- National Institute of Standards and Technology. (2018). Special Publication 800-53 Revision 5: Security and Privacy Controls for Information Systems and Organizations. Gaithersburg, MD.
- Federal Information Security Management Act (FISMA). (2014). Pub. L. No. 113-283.
- Department of Defense. (2018). Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS) 252.204-7012: Safeguarding Covered Defense Information and Cyber Incident Reporting.
- National Institute of Standards and Technology. (2020). NIST SP 800-171 Revision 2: Protecting Controlled Unclassified Information in Nonfederal Systems and Organizations. Gaithersburg, MD.
- International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR). (2018). 22 CFR Parts 120-130.
- Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement. (2016). Part 239—Acquisition of Information Technology.
- Council on Cybersecurity. (2018). The Cybersecurity Framework: Framework for Improving Critical Infrastructure Cybersecurity.
- Defense Information Systems Agency (DISA). (2020). Security Technical Implementation Guides (STIGs).
- Committee on National Security Systems. (2022). National Security Systems Authorization and Certification Standards.