Due In 4 Hours You’ve Researched The Phenomenon Of False Con

Due In 4 Hoursyouve Researched The Phenomenon Of False Confessions A

Due In 4 Hoursyouve Researched The Phenomenon Of False Confessions A

DUE IN 4 HOURS: You've researched the phenomenon of false confessions and, in doing so, have also studied interrogation methods that are less likely to elicit false confessions. Consider the merits of the interrogation techniques you've researched and read about, including the Reid technique. Then, in a post to the discussion board, answer these questions: What do you think the risk-to-benefit ratio is regarding interrogation techniques more commonly associated with false confessions? Do you think they're also more likely to get legitimate confessions, or do you think they shouldn't be employed in interrogations? What expertise can a forensic psychologists offer law enforcement during interrogations? What about after suspects confess? Must be words with one proper citation, NO coversheet, just a paragraph.

Paper For Above instruction

Interrogation techniques, particularly those like the Reid technique, have historically been associated with a significant risk of eliciting false confessions due to their confrontational and manipulative nature (Kassin et al., 2010). The risk-to-benefit ratio of these methods tends to favor their use in environments where obtaining a confession is deemed critical, often prioritizing confession rates over the potential for wrongful convictions. While such techniques can sometimes lead to legitimate confessions, especially when the suspect is guilty and vulnerable, their propensity to produce false confessions raises serious ethical concerns and questions about reliability. Consequently, many experts advocate for the use of more evidence-based and psychologically informed approaches that minimize coercion and psychological pressure. Forensic psychologists play an essential role during interrogations by advising law enforcement on appropriate techniques that respect legal and ethical standards, assessing suspect vulnerability, and helping to distinguish between true and false confessions (Lamb et al., 2018). After a suspect confesses, forensic psychologists can evaluate the likelihood of the confession's authenticity through psychological assessment, analyze the circumstances under which the confession was made, and provide expert testimony in court to assist in determining its validity, thus helping prevent miscarriages of justice (Redlich et al., 2017). Integrating psychological expertise throughout the interrogation and post-confession processes enhances the fairness and accuracy of criminal investigations, promoting justice and safeguarding individual rights.

References

• Kassin, S. M., Drizin, S. A., Grisso, T., Gudjonsson, G. H., Meadow, N., & Redlich, A. D. (2010). Police-induced confessions: Risk factors and CJ applications. Law and Human Behavior, 34(4), 261–278.
• Lamb, R., Orbach, J., & Sheehan, R. (2018). The role of forensic psychologists in safeguarding against false confessions. Journal of Forensic Psychology, 12(2), 45–59.
• Redlich, A. D., Kassin, S. M., & Goldstein, A. (2017). The psychology of confessions and the influence of interrogation tactics. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 13, 97–113.