Due In Week 8 And Worth 150 Points Overview This Assignment ✓ Solved

Due In Week 8 And Worth 150 Pointsoverviewthis Assignment Will Give Yo

Read and reflect on ONE of the provided articles related to business ethics. Write a paper analyzing the ethical implications and the impact of the events described in your chosen article. Your analysis should address the following questions:

  • What ideals, effects, and consequences are at stake?
  • Have any moral rights been violated?
  • What would a Utilitarian recommend?
  • What would a Kantian recommend?
  • Explain your rationale for each recommendation with supporting evidence.

Your paper must incorporate concepts learned in the course and follow the Strayer Writing Standards (SWS). Ensure your analysis is clear, well-structured, and properly formatted according to these standards. Focus on ethical decision-making considerations, including societal, corporate, legal, and moral aspects. Use credible sources to support your arguments and demonstrate an understanding of the ethical theories discussed.

Sample Paper For Above instruction

In this paper, I will analyze ethical implications presented in an article discussing corporate misconduct. The selected article details a case where a corporation engaged in deceptive practices that harmed consumers and violated legal standards. This situation raises significant ethical concerns regarding moral rights, societal effects, and corporate responsibilities.

Primarily, the article highlights a conflict between profit motives and ethical obligations. The company prioritized financial gains over transparency and consumer rights. This decision led to a loss of trust, legal penalties, and reputational damage, illustrating the consequences of unethical behavior in business (Crane, Matten, & Spence, 2014).

From a Utilitarian perspective, the action's consequences matter most. If the deceptive practices resulted in greater harm than benefits—such as consumer financial loss and erosion of trust—a Utilitarian would oppose such an approach. The goal is to maximize happiness and minimize pain; thus, policies that promote honesty and transparency are recommended to increase overall well-being (Mill, 1863).

Conversely, a Kantian would evaluate the morality based on whether the action adhered to universal moral duties and respect for persons. Given that deception treats consumers as means rather than ends, Kantian ethics would deem that behavior morally impermissible unless honesty can be universally upheld (Kant, 1785). This perspective emphasizes integrity, transparency, and respect for individual rights.

In conclusion, analyzing business ethics through different lenses reveals varying recommendations. Utilitarianism advocates for actions that maximize societal happiness, while Kantian ethics emphasize moral duties and respect. Both frameworks support the notion that honesty and responsibility are vital in sustaining ethical business practices. Implementing these principles can help firms navigate complex moral dilemmas and foster corporate integrity.

References

  • Crane, A., Matten, D., & Spence, L. J. (2014). Business Ethics: Managing Corporate Citizenship and Sustainability in the Age of Globalization. Oxford University Press.
  • Kant, I. (1785). Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals.
  • Mill, J. S. (1863). Utilitarianism. Parker, Son, and Bourn.
  • Other credible sources as appropriate.

Related Assignments