E-Portfolio Learning Assignment: 50 Points This Assignment S
Eportfolio Learning Assignment 50 Pointsthis Assignment Showcases Wh
This assignment showcases what you’ve learned about your learning. Collect information you’ve gathered about yourself and how you learn, such as learning styles inventories, personality type indicators, or other assessments of your personal preferences. Select a minimum of 3 assessments, interpret their results, and draw conclusions about yourself from this evidence, including strategies for autonomous learning.
Examples of assessments include:
- Personality Preferences (Carl Jung/Myers-Briggs)
- VARK Learning Styles
- Neil Fleming Multiple Intelligences
- Howard Gardner
- Emotional Intelligence (Daniel Goleman)
- Attribution Theory (Julian Rotter)
- Growth vs. Fixed Mindsets (Carol Dweck)
- Grit (Angela Duckworth)
To prepare your assignment for submission to eCampus and Portfolium:
- Create a new Microsoft Word document, complete the Quality World assignment, and save it as a .docx file on your desktop.
- Using Portfolium, create an eportfolio and upload this assignment, naming it (e.g., Quality World Assignment). Ensure your eportfolio is set to “public” so your instructor can view it.
- Retrieve your eportfolio URL from Portfolium and note it for submission.
- In eCampus, find the assignment link, click to open the submission box, and attach your saved document using the "Browse My Computer" option.
- Copy and paste the URL of your public eportfolio into the submission area on eCampus.
- Click "SUBMIT" to complete the assignment submission process. Do not paste your entire draft into comments; attach the document directly.
Repeat these steps for all remaining eportfolio assignments. At the end of the course, you will showcase your complete eportfolio, including all four assignments. For additional assistance, refer to the ePortfolio resources in eCampus.
Paper For Above instruction
The Effective Use of Personal Assessments to Foster Autonomous Learning
Understanding oneself through various assessments is crucial in fostering autonomous learning, which entails taking responsibility for one's own educational journey. The combined insights from personality inventories, learning styles, and cognitive theories can guide individuals toward more effective, personalized strategies of learning. This paper explores three significant assessments—Myers-Briggs Type Indicator, VARK Learning Styles, and Carol Dweck's Growth Mindset—and interprets their relevance to autonomous learning strategies.
The Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) offers insights into personality preferences, dissecting individuals into 16 distinct personality types based on dichotomous traits such as Introversion versus Extroversion, Thinking versus Feeling, and Judging versus Perceiving. Understanding one's MBTI results can reveal how one processes information, makes decisions, and interacts with their environment. For example, an INTJ personality might prefer structured, strategic learning, which suggests that autonomous learners with similar profiles thrive with self-directed projects and strategic planning. Recognizing personal traits enables learners to design study schedules aligned with their personality tendencies, thus increasing motivation and retention.
Complementing personality insights, the VARK Learning Styles model categorizes learners into Visual, Auditory, Read-Write, and Kinesthetic learners. Knowing one’s dominant learning modality allows for tailored strategies, such as visual aids and diagrams for visual learners or hands-on activities for kinesthetic learners. This personalization enhances engagement and facilitates deeper understanding, critical for autonomous learners who need to optimize their study environments independently. For instance, a kinesthetic learner might develop personal lab experiments or physical note-taking strategies to deepen their learning experience.
Carol Dweck's concept of Growth Mindset emphasizes the importance of believing in the capacity to develop abilities through effort and resilience. Individuals with a growth mindset are more likely to embrace challenges, persist through setbacks, and see failures as opportunities for learning. Cultivating this mindset is essential for autonomous learners, as it encourages self-motivation and persistence without external prompts. Strategies such as reflective journaling and setting incremental goals support the development of a growth mindset, thereby promoting sustained, self-directed learning over time.
Interpreting these assessments collectively enables learners to create comprehensive, personalized learning plans. For example, a learner with an INTJ personality type, a preference for visual learning, and a growth mindset can structure their study schedules with strategic, visual-based tasks that challenge their cognitive abilities and encourage resilience. These tailored approaches lead to increased self-efficacy and motivation, foundational elements in autonomous learning.
Furthermore, integrating these insights promotes metacognitive awareness—understanding one's learning preferences and mindsets enhances the ability to plan, monitor, and evaluate one's progress. Educators can facilitate this process by guiding students to reflect on their assessment results and adapt their study strategies accordingly. This aligns with the principles of self-regulated learning, where individuals actively manage their learning processes to achieve personal goals.
In conclusion, assessments such as the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator, VARK Learning Styles, and Growth Mindset foster a deeper understanding of personal learning preferences and attitudes, thus empowering individuals to develop autonomous learning strategies. By tailoring their approaches based on personality traits, learning modalities, and mindset inclinations, learners can optimize their educational experiences, increase motivation, and achieve sustained academic success. The deliberate application of these insights strengthens self-efficacy and promotes lifelong learning skills essential for today’s dynamic world.
References
- Bem, D. J. (1993). The self-perception theory. Psychology Press.
- Fleming, N., & Mills, C. (1992). Not Another Inventory, Rather a Catalyst for Reflection. To Improve the Academy, 11, 1-24.
- Dweck, C. S. (2006). Mindset: The new psychology of success. Random House.
- Goleman, D. (1995). Emotional intelligence. Bantam Books.
- Myers, I. B., & Briggs, P. B. (1998). Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. CPP, Inc.
- Neil Fleming. (2001). VARK Modalities of Learning. VARK website. https://vark-learn.com.
- Rotter, J. B. (1966). Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 80(1), 1–28.
- Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. Basic Books.
- Goleman, D. (1998). Working with Emotional Intelligence. Bantam Books.
- Duckworth, A., & Gross, J. J. (2014). Self-control and grit: Related but separable determinants of success. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 23(5), 319-325.