Earlier This Week In The Discussion Forum You Reviewed Serve
Earlier This Week In The Discussion Forum You Reviewed Severalscenari
Earlier this week in the discussion forum, you reviewed several scenarios and discussed one or two studies that you would be interested in using for the Week Six Intervention Proposal. You should now make your final decision regarding which case study you would like to use to create your Intervention Proposal and begin doing your research. As part of that research, this week you will be creating an annotated bibliography of seven to eight peer-reviewed, contemporary articles (published within the past 10 years) from the Ashford University Library. For each article, provide a brief annotation (approximately 150 words). Remember, you are not writing an abstract; you are writing an annotation. The annotation should be a scholarly evaluation of the article. Explain why you think this article is important and address any potential ethical concerns with the research. In essence, each annotation is like a mini article critique. Your research should cast a wide net, and the articles should represent different sides of the research (approximately a 50-50 split). As you do your research, it is good to keep an open mind to ensure you do not miss something important. While there is no set page requirement for this bibliography, it should be approximately four to five pages in length and be formatted according to APA-style guidelines.
Paper For Above instruction
The assignment at hand involves developing an annotated bibliography of seven to eight peer-reviewed, contemporary articles related to a specific case study that I have selected for my Week Six Intervention Proposal. This process requires a comprehensive understanding of current research within the past ten years, sourced from the Ashford University Library. The primary purpose of this bibliography is to critically evaluate each article, highlighting its significance, methodological rigor, ethical considerations, and contribution to the field. This task not only enhances my understanding of the research landscape but also equips me with a broad spectrum of perspectives, ensuring my intervention proposal is well-informed and nuanced.
The first step in this process was to decide on the case study I wish to investigate. This decision stemmed from an initial review of several scenarios discussed in the forum, each offering different angles and research opportunities. Whether the focus is on mental health, substance abuse, program efficacy, or policy impacts, the selected case study sets the foundation for targeted research. Once the case is chosen, I begin the search for relevant articles, prioritizing peer-reviewed journal articles published within the last decade, ensuring the research is recent and relevant. The articles will encompass a variety of viewpoints—about a 50-50 split—to provide a balanced and comprehensive overview of the research landscape.
Creating each annotation involves a scholarly critique of the article, demonstrating its importance to my research and considering any ethical concerns, such as participant confidentiality, informed consent, and potential biases. The annotations should be approximately 150 words each, succinct but thorough enough to evaluate the article's contribution critically. This exercise not only sharpens my analytical skills but also prepares me to synthesize diverse perspectives into my intervention proposal, grounded in solid evidence and ethical integrity. The final product should span four to five pages, formatted according to APA guidelines, reflecting a polished and scholarly presentation of the literature review.