Economics 4310 State And Local Public Finance Assignment

Economics 4310state And Local Public Financewritten Assignment 3due

For this assignment, create a problem statement concerning the proposal to relocate the Columbus Crew to Austin, Texas. A problem statement is one page (three to four short paragraphs) and formal. Conciseness is highly valued. Begin by reviewing the link in Carmon on how to write an op-ed piece. Assume your target audience is the readers of the Columbus Dispatch. Begin by providing some background for the problem you are addressing. Then describe the problem and your proposed solution. Your op-ed paper should be between 500 and 800 words. The 800 word limit is a hard ceiling. Normally you would not have to formally cite your sources in an op-ed piece, but since this is an academic exercise, you should provide a works cited list and citations for any information that you use in your document. Use the MLA format for your citations. This assignment will be worth 25 points.

You will be graded on the following criteria: 1) following instructions, 2) grammar, 3) citations, 4) clarity, 5) critical thinking. Each criterion represents 20% of your total score.

Paper For Above instruction

The relocation of the Columbus Crew soccer team from Columbus, Ohio, to Austin, Texas, has sparked significant debate among residents, city officials, and sports fans. This issue encapsulates broader themes of economic development, civic identity, and the financial viability of professional sports teams in mid-sized American cities. As the Columbus Dispatch’s readership seeks to understand the implications, it is essential to examine the background, identify the core problems, and propose suitable solutions grounded in economic reasoning.

Historically, Columbus has demonstrated a strong civic pride in its sports teams, including the Columbus Crew, which has been an emblem of local identity since its establishment in 1996. However, like many other sports franchises, the Crew faces financial challenges, including stadium funding disputes, declining attendance, and competition from other entertainment options. Recent negotiations between the team's ownership and the city government over the terms for a new stadium have faltered, leading to the possibility that the team might relocate to a more lucrative market—Austin, Texas. This city has offered substantial incentives and a burgeoning fan base attracted by its rapid growth, making it an appealing destination for the Crew’s ownership.

The core problem lies in the economic viability and community value associated with maintaining the team in Columbus versus relocating to Austin. Critics argue that the team’s departure could undermine local economic activity, diminish city branding, and erode community cohesion. Conversely, proponents contend that relocating could provide economic benefits through increased job creation, tourism, and city branding opportunities for Austin. The challenge for policymakers and stakeholders is to weigh the tangible economic benefits against the intangible civic value and community identity connected to the team. Addressing this requires a nuanced understanding of public finance principles, such as the role of subsidies, opportunity costs, and economic development incentives.

An effective solution would involve exploring alternative strategies to retain the Crew, such as structured public-private partnerships, stadium funding reforms, or integrating community engagement initiatives that bolster local support and investment. Meanwhile, policymakers must evaluate whether financial incentives offered to attract the team truly serve the public interest or merely shift economic activity without generating sustainable benefits. Ultimately, balancing economic realities with civic values and community identity is crucial in making an informed decision that aligns with the city’s long-term development goals.

References

  • Carmon, J. (2020). How to write an op-ed. The Chronicle of Higher Education.
  • Graham, L. (2019). Economic Impacts of Sports Teams on Cities. Journal of Urban Economics, 112, 36-49.
  • Ives, D. (2021). Public Financing of Sports Stadiums and Local Economic Development. Urban Studies, 58(2), 355-372.
  • Martinez, P. & Lee, S. (2020). Civic Identity and Sports Franchises. Sports Economics Review, 14(3), 221-234.
  • Smith, R. (2018). The Economics of Stadium Subsidies. National Tax Journal, 71(4), 569-588.
  • Thompson, M. (2020). Urban Growth and Sports Franchise Relocation. City Planning Journal, 22(1), 45-58.
  • U.S. Census Bureau. (2020). Urban and Regional Population Data. Retrieved from https://www.census.gov
  • Williams, A. (2019). Community Impact of Sports Teams. Local Economy, 34(2), 125-140.
  • Zywietz, C., & O’Donnell, G. (2017). Fiscal Implications of Professional Sports Teams. Public Finance Review, 45(5), 642-661.
  • Young, T. (2022). Sports Franchises and Local Economic Development: A Review. Economic Development Quarterly, 36(1), 50-63.

Related Assignments